Tracing genetic resurrection of pointing dog breeds: Cesky Fousek as both survivor and rescuer
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
31449543
PubMed Central
PMC6709920
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0221418
PII: PONE-D-19-05674
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chov * MeSH
- genetická variace genetika MeSH
- genotyp MeSH
- mikrosatelitní repetice genetika MeSH
- polymorfismus genetický genetika MeSH
- psi genetika MeSH
- rodokmen MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- psi genetika MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Cesky Fousek is considered to be one of the oldest pointing dog breeds in Europe and has been appreciated for its versatile working skills. Because it faced extinction in the past, the Cesky Fousek was restored from German Wirehaired and Shorthaired Pointers. Additionally, the breed was recently used in the USA with the initial intent of improvement of the Wirehaired Pointing Griffon (synonymous with Korthals Griffon) by the Bohemian Wirehaired Pointing Griffon Club of America. This study evaluates genetic diversity parameters of Cesky Fousek and compares them to the other continental pointing dogs that played a role in the formation of its gene pool. DNA from buccal swab and blood samples (n = 405) were analyzed using 18 microsatellite markers. Parameters of genetic polymorphism show that the Cesky Fousek breed has a comparable rate of variation as other hunting breeds despite the low population size and severe historical bottlenecks. Clustering analyses reveal a unique genetic status as a distinct pointing dog breed and the relatedness of the breeds is in good concordance with historical data. The present study demonstrates that despite historical admixture among lineages, separate pointing breeds constitute genetically differentiated units, mirroring unique breeding stocks and pedigree isolation among specific breed clubs, reflecting differences in breeding programs under each association.
Department of Biology and Ecology University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Molecular and Biomedical Sciences University of Maine Orono Maine United States of America
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Germonpré M, Lázničková-Galetová M, Sablin MV. Palaeolithic dog skulls at the Gravettian Předmostí site, the Czech Republic. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2012;39: 184–202.
Napierala H, Uerpmann H-P. A ‘new’palaeolithic dog from central Europe. International journal of osteoarchaeology. 2012;22: 127–137.
Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005;438: 803–819. 10.1038/nature04338 PubMed DOI
Savolainen P, Zhang Y, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science. 2002;298: 1610–1613. 10.1126/science.1073906 PubMed DOI
Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE, Amorim IR, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL, et al. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science. 1997;276: 1687–1689. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1687 PubMed DOI
Clutton-Brock J. A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Streitberger K, Schweizer M, Kropatsch R, Dekomien G, Distl O, Fischer MS, et al. Rapid genetic diversification within dog breeds as evidenced by a case study on Schnauzers. Anim Genet. 2012;43: 577–586. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02300.x PubMed DOI
Parker HG, Kim LV, Sutter NB, Carlson S, Lorentzen TD, Malek TB, et al. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. science. 2004;304: 1160–1164. 10.1126/science.1097406 PubMed DOI
Koshyk C. Pointing Dogs, Volume One: The Continentals. First edition Winnipeg: Dog Willing Publications; 2011.
Kuhn J. Monografie českého fouska. Nový Bydžov: Klub chovatelů českých fousků; 2005.
Mortlock S-A, Khatkar MS, Williamson P. Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs. PloS one. 2016;11: e0147941 10.1371/journal.pone.0147941 PubMed DOI PMC
Shariflou MR, James JW, Nicholas FW, Wade CM. A genealogical survey of Australian registered dog breeds. The Veterinary Journal. 2011;189: 203–210. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.020 PubMed DOI
Asher L, Diesel G, Summers JF, McGreevy PD, Collins LM. Inherited defects in pedigree dogs. Part 1: Disorders related to breed standards. The Veterinary Journal. 2009;182: 402–411. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.033 PubMed DOI
Ionașcu I, Georgescu AE, Vlagioiu C. Surgical reduction of a total entropion in a Chow-Chow using rhytidectomy. Scientific Works Series C Veterinary Medicine. 2013;59: 109–113.
Serpell J. The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour, and Interactions with People. Cambridge University Press; 1995.
Urfer SR. Inbreeding and fertility in Irish Wolfhounds in Sweden: 1976 to 2007. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2009;51: 21 10.1186/1751-0147-51-21 PubMed DOI PMC
Dostál J. Český fousek. 1. vyd. Praha: Fortuna Libri; 2009.
Kadich H von. Der stichelhaarige deutsche Vorstehhund. Ein monographischer Beitrag zur Gesammt-Kynologie. Wilhelm Baensch Verlagshandlung; Berlin; 1888.
Carty D. The Other Griffon. In: Gun Dog Magazine [Internet]. 23 Sep 2010 [cited 22 Nov 2017]. Available: http://www.gundogmag.com/breeds/gundog_breeds_gd_griffon_0109/
Bailey J. Griffon Gun Dog Supreme: The History and the Story of How to Improve a Breed. 1st edition Hillsboro, Or: Swan Valley Press; 1996.
Castaing J. Les Chiens d’Arret. Paris: Crépin-Leblond; 1960.
Nelson MJ. Wirehaired Pointing Griffon. In: Gun Dog Magazine [Internet]. 7 Feb 2011 [cited 22 Nov 2017]. Available: http://www.gundogmag.com/breeds/gundog_breeds_gd_dutch_0707/
Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity. 1995; doi:86:248–249
Rousset F. genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular ecology resources. 2008;8: 103–106. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x PubMed DOI
Guo SW, Thompson EA. A Monte Carlo method for combined segregation and linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51: 1111–1126. PubMed PMC
Langella O. Populations 1.2.30 [Internet]. 1999 [cited 25 Jan 2018]. Available: http://bioinformatics.org/~tryphon/populations/#ancre_telechargement
Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist. 1972;106: 283–292.
Rambaut A. FigTree v1.4.2 [Internet]. 2006 [cited 30 Nov 2017]. Available: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France) [Internet]. 2004. 1996 [cited 30 Nov 2017]. Available: http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155: 945–959. PubMed PMC
Li Y-L, Liu J-X. StructureSelector: A web-based software to select and visualize the optimal number of clusters using multiple methods. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2018;18: 176–177. 10.1111/1755-0998.12719 PubMed DOI
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular ecology. 2005;14: 2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x PubMed DOI
Puechmaille SJ. The program structure does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2016;16: 608–627. 10.1111/1755-0998.12512 PubMed DOI
Shaffer LG, Ramirez CJ, Sundin K, Connell LB, Ballif BC. Genetic screening and mutation identification in a rare canine breed, the ceský fousek. Veterinary Record Case Reports. 2016;4: e000346 10.1136/vetreccr-2016-000346 DOI
Ackerman LJ. The genetic connection: a guide to health problems in purebred dogs. American Animal Hosp Assoc; 2011.
Dostál J, Martenek M, Tripes O, Koberová S. Český fousek. České Budějovice: Dona; 1998.
Schmutz SM, Berryere TG. Genes affecting coat colour and pattern in domestic dogs: a review: Coat colour genes in dogs. Animal Genetics. 2007;38: 539–549. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01664.x PubMed DOI
Smetanová M, Bolfíková BČ, Randi E, Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Galaverni M, et al. From Wolves to Dogs, and Back: Genetic Composition of the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog. PloS one. 2015;10: e0143807 10.1371/journal.pone.0143807 PubMed DOI PMC
Leroy G, Verrier E, Meriaux JC, Rognon X. Genetic diversity of dog breeds: within-breed diversity comparing genealogical and molecular data. Animal Genetics. 2009;40: 323–332. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01842.x PubMed DOI
Parra D, Méndez S, Cañón J, Dunner S. Genetic differentiation in pointing dog breeds inferred from microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA sequence. Animal Genetics. 2008;39: 1–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01658.x PubMed DOI