Impact of persistent PSA after salvage radical prostatectomy: a multicenter study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
37803241
PubMed Central
PMC11543598
DOI
10.1038/s41391-023-00728-5
PII: 10.1038/s41391-023-00728-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru * patologie chirurgie krev MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- nádory prostaty * chirurgie patologie krev mortalita MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- prostatektomie * metody MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen * krev MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- záchranná terapie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen * MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Persistent prostatic specific antigen (PSA) represents a poor prognostic factor for recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the impact of persistent PSA on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing salvage RP is unknown. To investigate the impact of persistent PSA after salvage RP on long-term oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent salvage RP for recurrent prostate cancer between 2000 and 2021 were identified from twelve high-volume centers. Only patients with available PSA after salvage RP were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the effect of persistent PSA on biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis and any death after salvage RP. Persistent PSA was defined as a PSA-value ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, at first PSA-measurement after salvage RP. RESULTS: Overall, 580 patients were identified. Of those, 42% (n = 242) harbored persistent PSA. Median follow-up after salvage RP was 38 months, median time to salvage RP was 64 months and median time to first PSA after salvage RP was 2.2 months. At 84 months after salvage RP, BCR-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival was 6.6 vs. 59%, 71 vs. 88% and 77 vs. 94% for patients with persistent vs. undetectable PSA after salvage RP (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models persistent PSA was an independent predictor for BCR (HR: 5.47, p < 0.001) and death (HR: 3.07, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Persistent PSA is common after salvage RP and represents an independent predictor for worse oncologic outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RP should be closely monitored after surgery to identify those with persistent PSA.
Department of Surgical Sciences San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin Turin Italy
Department of Urologic Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes Paris France
Department of Urology Koc University Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Department of Urology Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich Germany
Department of Urology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany
Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Mandel P, Steuber T, Ahyai S, Kriegmair M, Schiffmann J, Boehm K, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer: Verification of European Association of Urology guideline criteria. BJU Int. 2016;117:55–61. PubMed
Grubmüller B, Jahrreiss V, Brönimann S, Quhal F, Mori K, Heidenreich A, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: an updated systematic review of oncologic, histopathologic and functional outcomes and predictors of good response. Curr Oncol. 2021;28:2881–92. PubMed PMC
Stamey TA, Kabalin JN, McNeal JE, Johnstone IM, Freiha F, Redwine EA, et al. Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. II. radical prostatectomy treated patients. J Urol. 1989;141:1076–83. PubMed
EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2022. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5.
Preisser F, Chun FKH, Pompe RS, Heinze A, Salomon G, Graefen M, et al. Persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and its impact on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;76:106–14. PubMed
Lohm G, Bottke D, Jamil B, Miller K, Neumann K, Bartkowiak D, et al. Salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistently detectable PSA or PSA rising from an undetectable range after radical prostatectomy gives comparable results. World J Urol. 2013;31:423–8. PubMed
Naselli A, Introini C, Andreatta R, Spina B, Truini M, Puppo P. Prognostic factors of persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy. International Journal of Urology. 2009;16:82–86. PubMed
Kumar A, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Coelho RF, Rocco B, et al. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2017;11:37–45. PubMed
Audenet F, Seringe E, Drouin SJ, Comperat E, Cussenot O, Bitker MO, et al. Persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen at six weeks after radical prostatectomy helps in early identification of patients who are likely to recur. World J Urol. 2012;30:239–44. PubMed
Budäus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Haese A, Steuber T, et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56:317–24. PubMed
Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Engel O, Michl U, et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;60:320–9. PubMed
Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, Heinzer H, Tilki D, Salomon G, et al. A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU Int. 2019;123:1031–40. PubMed
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, et al. The effect of lymph node dissection on cancer-specific survival in salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Prostate. 2021;81:339–46. PubMed
Heidenreich A, Richter S, Thüer D, Pfister D. Prognostic parameters, complications, and oncologic and functional outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after 21st-century radiotherapy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:437–45. PubMed
Sanderson KM, Penson DF, Cai J, Groshen S, Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006;176:2025–32. PubMed
Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ, DiBlasio CJ, Fearn PA, Eastham JA. Morbidity and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol. 2004;172:2239–43. PubMed
Ward JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, Zincke H. Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J Urol. 2005;173:1156–60. PubMed
Pokala N, Huynh DL, Henderson AA, Johans C. Survival outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy after primary radiation treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14:218–25. PubMed
McDonald ML, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Cooperberg MR, Amling CL, et al. First postoperative PSA is associated with outcomes in patients with node positive prostate cancer: Results from the SEARCH database. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2018;36:239.e17–239.e25. PubMed
Bianchi L, Nini A, Bianchi M, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Suardi N, et al. The role of prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy for the prediction of clinical progression and cancer-specific mortality in node-positive prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2016;69:1142–8. PubMed
Sengupta S, Christensen CM, Zincke H, Slezak JM, Leibovich BC, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Detectable prostate specific antigen between 60 and 120 days following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: natural history and prognostic significance. J Urol. 2006;176:559–63. PubMed
Sundi D, Wang V, Pierorazio PM, Han M, Partin AW, Tran PT, et al. Identification of men with the highest risk of early disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate. 2014;74:628–36. PubMed PMC
Ploussard G, Staerman F, Pierrevelcin J, Saad R, Beauval JB, Roupret M, et al. Predictive factors of oncologic outcomes in patients who do not achieve undetectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2013;190:1750–6. PubMed
Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Colicchia M, Boorjian SA, Bossi A, Seisen T, et al. Impact of early salvage radiation therapy in patients with persistently elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73:436–44. PubMed