florio® HAEMO: A Longitudinal Survey of Patient Preference, Adherence and Wearable Functionality in Central Europe

. 2024 Jul ; 41 (7) : 2791-2807. [epub] 20240516

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38753106
Odkazy

PubMed 38753106
PubMed Central PMC11213760
DOI 10.1007/s12325-024-02872-3
PII: 10.1007/s12325-024-02872-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

INTRODUCTION: florio® HAEMO is a hemophilia treatment monitoring application (app) offering activity tracking and wearable device connectivity. Its use might support everyday activities for people with hemophilia. The aim of this study was to evaluate user satisfaction, long-term usage and the impact on data entry when pairing a wearable with a hemophilia monitoring app. METHODS: This is a follow-up of a two-part user survey conducted in Central Europe. People with hemophilia and parents/caregivers of children with hemophilia using florio HAEMO and who completed part one were invited to complete a second online questionnaire at least 4 months later. RESULTS: Fifty participants (83.3%) who completed part one of the survey continued to use the florio HAEMO app and completed part two. Of 14 participants who chose to use the app with a wearable, more than half (57.1%) were aged between 13 and 25 years. Overall, the results demonstrated that florio HAEMO is very easy or rather easy to use, especially for individuals pairing the app with a wearable. Most people using a wearable indicated that florio HAEMO was very or rather important in bringing certainty to daily activities (85.7%). Notably, 14 of 36 (38.9%) non-wearable users indicated that they would prefer to pair the app with a wearable in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the florio HAEMO app is maintained over an extended period of use. Pairing the app with a wearable might enable easier access to app features, increase data entry motivation and provide more certainty about daily activities for people with hemophilia.

Blood Center University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Hematology and Oncology University Children's Hospital University Medical Center Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine National Hemophilia Center Faculty of Medicine of Comenius University and University Hospital Bratislava Slovakia

Department of Hematology University Medical Center Ljubljana Faculty of Medicine University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Department of Onco Hematology Heim Pál Nationale Institute of Pediatrics Budapest Hungary

Department of Pediatric Hematology and Biochemistry Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Pediatric Hematology and Biochemistry University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology University Hospital Motol 5 Úvalu 84 150 06 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Pediatric Oncology Hematology and Transplantology Warsaw Medical University Warsaw Poland

Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Pediatrics University Hospital Center Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

Division of Hematology Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital Center Zagreb University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia

HZRM Hamophilie Zentrum Rhein Main Mörfelden Walldorf Germany

National Hemophilia Centre and Haemostasis Department Central Hospital of Northern Pest Military Hospital Budapest Hungary

School of Medicine Zagreb Croatia

Secondary Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AG Basel Switzerland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Okaygoun D, et al. Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00760-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Zapotocka E, et al. First experience of a hemophilia monitoring platform: florio HAEMO. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6(2):e12685. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12685. PubMed DOI PMC

Hay CRM, et al. The haemtrack home therapy reporting system: design, implementation, strengths and weaknesses: a report from UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation. Haemophilia. 2017;23(5):728–735. doi: 10.1111/hae.13287. PubMed DOI

Mondorf W, et al. Smart Medication ™, an electronic diary for surveillance of haemophilia home care and optimization of resource distribution. Hamostaseologie. 2019;39(4):339–346. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675575. PubMed DOI

Arvanitakis A, et al. A comparison of MyPKFiT and WAPPS-Hemo as dosing tools for optimizing prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A treated with Octocog alfa. Haemophilia. 2021;27(3):417–424. doi: 10.1111/hae.14295. PubMed DOI

McMaster University. WAPPS-Hemo. https://www.wapps-hemo.org/. Published 2021. Accessed Dec 2023.

Huhn S, et al. The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(1):e34384. doi: 10.2196/34384. PubMed DOI PMC

Dodd C, et al. Wearable activity trackers in young people with haemophilia: what needs to be considered? Haemophilia. 2023;29(3):942–945. doi: 10.1111/hae.14790. PubMed DOI

Kang HS, et al. Wearing the future-wearables to empower users to take greater responsibility for their health and care: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(7):e35684. doi: 10.2196/35684. PubMed DOI PMC

Khair K, et al. Self-management and skills acquisition in boys with haemophilia. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1105–1113. doi: 10.1111/hex.12083. PubMed DOI PMC

Dirzu N, et al. Mobile health technology for the personalized therapy of hemophilia. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:711973. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.711973. PubMed DOI PMC

Thornburg CD, et al. Treatment adherence in hemophilia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1677–1686. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S139851. PubMed DOI PMC

Boric K, et al. Outcome domains and pain outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of interventions for postoperative pain in children and adolescents. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(2):389–396. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1313. PubMed DOI

Dosenovic S, et al. Efficacy and safety outcome domains and outcome measures in systematic reviews of neuropathic pain conditions. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(7):674–684. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000574. PubMed DOI

Pogatzki-Zahn E, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for acute and chronic pain: current knowledge and future directions. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019;32(5):616–622. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000780. PubMed DOI

Leroux A, et al. Wearable devices: Current status and opportunities in pain assessment and management. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(1):89–102. doi: 10.1159/000515576. PubMed DOI PMC

Vijayan V, et al. Review of wearable devices and data collection considerations for connected health. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21(16):5589. doi: 10.3390/s21165589. PubMed DOI PMC

Massoomi MR, et al. Increasing and evolving role of smart devices in modern medicine. Eur Cardiol. 2019;14(3):181–186. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.02. PubMed DOI PMC

Morrissey EC, et al. Smartphone apps for improving medication adherence in hypertension: patients' perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:813–822. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S145647. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...