florio® HAEMO: A Longitudinal Survey of Patient Preference, Adherence and Wearable Functionality in Central Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38753106
PubMed Central
PMC11213760
DOI
10.1007/s12325-024-02872-3
PII: 10.1007/s12325-024-02872-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Adherence, Florio HAEMO, Hemophilia, Patient satisfaction, Wearable,
- MeSH
- adherence pacienta statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hemofilie A * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mobilní aplikace MeSH
- nositelná elektronika * MeSH
- pacientova volba * MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
INTRODUCTION: florio® HAEMO is a hemophilia treatment monitoring application (app) offering activity tracking and wearable device connectivity. Its use might support everyday activities for people with hemophilia. The aim of this study was to evaluate user satisfaction, long-term usage and the impact on data entry when pairing a wearable with a hemophilia monitoring app. METHODS: This is a follow-up of a two-part user survey conducted in Central Europe. People with hemophilia and parents/caregivers of children with hemophilia using florio HAEMO and who completed part one were invited to complete a second online questionnaire at least 4 months later. RESULTS: Fifty participants (83.3%) who completed part one of the survey continued to use the florio HAEMO app and completed part two. Of 14 participants who chose to use the app with a wearable, more than half (57.1%) were aged between 13 and 25 years. Overall, the results demonstrated that florio HAEMO is very easy or rather easy to use, especially for individuals pairing the app with a wearable. Most people using a wearable indicated that florio HAEMO was very or rather important in bringing certainty to daily activities (85.7%). Notably, 14 of 36 (38.9%) non-wearable users indicated that they would prefer to pair the app with a wearable in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the florio HAEMO app is maintained over an extended period of use. Pairing the app with a wearable might enable easier access to app features, increase data entry motivation and provide more certainty about daily activities for people with hemophilia.
Blood Center University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Onco Hematology Heim Pál Nationale Institute of Pediatrics Budapest Hungary
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Biochemistry Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Biochemistry University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
HZRM Hamophilie Zentrum Rhein Main Mörfelden Walldorf Germany
School of Medicine Zagreb Croatia
Secondary Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Okaygoun D, et al. Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00760-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Zapotocka E, et al. First experience of a hemophilia monitoring platform: florio HAEMO. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6(2):e12685. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12685. PubMed DOI PMC
Hay CRM, et al. The haemtrack home therapy reporting system: design, implementation, strengths and weaknesses: a report from UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation. Haemophilia. 2017;23(5):728–735. doi: 10.1111/hae.13287. PubMed DOI
Mondorf W, et al. Smart Medication ™, an electronic diary for surveillance of haemophilia home care and optimization of resource distribution. Hamostaseologie. 2019;39(4):339–346. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675575. PubMed DOI
Arvanitakis A, et al. A comparison of MyPKFiT and WAPPS-Hemo as dosing tools for optimizing prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A treated with Octocog alfa. Haemophilia. 2021;27(3):417–424. doi: 10.1111/hae.14295. PubMed DOI
McMaster University. WAPPS-Hemo. https://www.wapps-hemo.org/. Published 2021. Accessed Dec 2023.
Huhn S, et al. The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(1):e34384. doi: 10.2196/34384. PubMed DOI PMC
Dodd C, et al. Wearable activity trackers in young people with haemophilia: what needs to be considered? Haemophilia. 2023;29(3):942–945. doi: 10.1111/hae.14790. PubMed DOI
Kang HS, et al. Wearing the future-wearables to empower users to take greater responsibility for their health and care: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(7):e35684. doi: 10.2196/35684. PubMed DOI PMC
Khair K, et al. Self-management and skills acquisition in boys with haemophilia. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1105–1113. doi: 10.1111/hex.12083. PubMed DOI PMC
Dirzu N, et al. Mobile health technology for the personalized therapy of hemophilia. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:711973. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.711973. PubMed DOI PMC
Thornburg CD, et al. Treatment adherence in hemophilia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1677–1686. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S139851. PubMed DOI PMC
Boric K, et al. Outcome domains and pain outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of interventions for postoperative pain in children and adolescents. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(2):389–396. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1313. PubMed DOI
Dosenovic S, et al. Efficacy and safety outcome domains and outcome measures in systematic reviews of neuropathic pain conditions. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(7):674–684. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000574. PubMed DOI
Pogatzki-Zahn E, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures for acute and chronic pain: current knowledge and future directions. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019;32(5):616–622. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000780. PubMed DOI
Leroux A, et al. Wearable devices: Current status and opportunities in pain assessment and management. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(1):89–102. doi: 10.1159/000515576. PubMed DOI PMC
Vijayan V, et al. Review of wearable devices and data collection considerations for connected health. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21(16):5589. doi: 10.3390/s21165589. PubMed DOI PMC
Massoomi MR, et al. Increasing and evolving role of smart devices in modern medicine. Eur Cardiol. 2019;14(3):181–186. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.02. PubMed DOI PMC
Morrissey EC, et al. Smartphone apps for improving medication adherence in hypertension: patients' perspectives. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:813–822. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S145647. PubMed DOI PMC