Routine Imaging or Symptomatic Follow-Up After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

. 2025 Jan 01 ; 160 (1) : 74-84.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39504033

IMPORTANCE: International guidelines lack consistency in their recommendations regarding routine imaging in the follow-up after pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Consequently, follow-up strategies differ between centers worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes, including recurrence-focused treatment and survival, in patients with PDAC recurrence who received symptomatic follow-up or routine imaging after pancreatic resection in international centers affiliated with the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective, international, cross-sectional study. Patients from a total of 33 E-AHPBA centers from 13 countries were included between 2020 and 2021. According to the predefined study protocol, patients who underwent PDAC resection and were diagnosed with disease recurrence were prospectively included. Patients were stratified according to postoperative follow-up strategy: symptomatic follow-up (ie, without routine imaging) or routine imaging. EXPOSURES: Symptomatic follow-up or routine imaging in patients who underwent PDAC resection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. To adjust for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between follow-up strategy and recurrence-focused treatment. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to study the independent association between follow-up strategy and OS. RESULTS: Overall, 333 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [11] years; 184 male [55%]) with PDAC recurrence were included. Median (IQR) follow-up at time of analysis 2 years after inclusion of the last patient was 40 (30-58) months. Of the total cohort, 98 patients (29%) received symptomatic follow-up, and 235 patients (71%) received routine imaging. OS was 23 months (95% CI, 19-29 months) vs 28 months (95% CI, 24-30 months) in the groups who received symptomatic follow-up vs routine imaging, respectively (P = .01). Routine imaging was associated with receiving recurrence-focused treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.22-5.41; P = .01) and prolonged OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-.99; P = .04). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this international, prospective, cross-sectional study, routine follow-up imaging after pancreatic resection for PDAC was independently associated with receiving recurrence-focused treatment and prolonged OS.

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Department of Surgery Amsterdam the Netherlands

Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

Clinic for Digestive Surgery University Clinical Centra of Serbia Medical Faculty University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Clinic of Surgery UKSH Campus Lübeck Lübeck Germany

Department of Academic Surgery Glasgow Royal Infirmary Glasgow United Kingdom

Department of General and Digestive Surgery Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca Murcia Spain

Department of General and Digestive Surgery Miguel Servet University Hospital Zaragoza Spain

Department of General and Digestive Surgery University Hospital La Princesa Madrid Spain

Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium

Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery University Medical Center Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of General Visceral and Vascular Surgery Community Hospital Horn Horn Austria

Department of Hepato Pancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain

Department of HepatoPancreatoBiliary Surgery Hygeia Hospital Marousi Greece

Department of HPB Endocrine and Transplantation Surgery Antwerp University Hospital Antwerp Belgium

Department of Internal Medicine Gastroenterology Hepatology Endocrinology and Metabolism Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Tyrol Austria

Department of Medical Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Department of Pancreatic Surgery IRCCS Humanitas Hospital Rozzano and Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy

Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Catharina Hospital Eindhoven the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Hospital Clínico University of Valencia Biomedical Research Institute Valencia Spain

Department of Surgery Hospital Prof Doutor Fernando Fonseca EPE Amadora Portugal

Department of Surgery Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII Tarragona Spain

Department of Surgery Isala the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Karolinska Institutet Solna Sweden

Department of Surgery Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Medical Spectrum Twente Enschede the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Military University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Surgery Newcastle Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom

Department of Surgery Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein Utrecht the Netherlands

Department of Surgery Royal Free Hospital London United Kingdom

Department of Surgery Santokba Institute of Digestive Surgical Sciences Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital Rajasthan India

Department of Surgery School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands

Department of Surgery University Hospital of Larissa Larissa Greece

Department of Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen the Netherlands

Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa Pisa Italy

Department of Visceral Transplant and Thoracic Surgery Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Division of Imaging and Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Institute of Cancer Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom

Pancreatic Surgical Unit Pederzoli Hospital Peschiera del Garda Italy

Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein Department of Gastroenterology Utrecht the Netherlands

Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12-49. Published online January 17, 2024. doi:10.3322/caac.21820 PubMed DOI

Groot VP, Blair AB, Gemenetzis G, et al. . Recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy and resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(9):1674-1683. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.007 PubMed DOI

Daamen LA, Groot VP, Intven MPW, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(10):1770-1777. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.031 PubMed DOI

Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, et al. . Patterns, timing, and predictors of recurrence following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):936-945. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002234 PubMed DOI

Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D. The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16425. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73525-y PubMed DOI PMC

Strobel O, Lorenz P, Hinz U, et al. . Actual 5-year survival after upfront resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: who beats the odds? Ann Surg. 2022;275(5):962-971. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004147 PubMed DOI

Daamen LA, Groot VP, Heerkens HD, Intven MPW, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ. Systematic review on the role of serum tumor markers in the detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(4):297-304. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.009 PubMed DOI

Balaj C, Ayav A, Oliver A, et al. . CT imaging of early local recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41(2):273-282. doi:10.1007/s00261-015-0564-z PubMed DOI

Conroy T, Pfeiffer P, Vilgrain V, et al. ; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org . Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(11):987-1002. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.009 PubMed DOI

Deobald RG, Cheng ESW, Ko YJ, Wright FC, Karanicolas PJ. A qualitative study of patient and clinician attitudes regarding surveillance after a resection of pancreatic and periampullary cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(5):409-415. doi:10.1111/hpb.12378 PubMed DOI PMC

Tingstedt B, Andersson B, Jönsson C, et al. . First results from the Swedish National Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer Registry. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(1):34-42. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.1811 PubMed DOI

Silvestris N, Brunetti O, Bittoni A, et al. . Clinical Practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of exocrine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evidence evaluation and recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM). Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1681. doi:10.3390/cancers12061681 PubMed DOI PMC

O’Reilly D, Fou L, Hasler E, et al. . Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer in adults: a summary of guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pancreatology. 2018;18(8):962-970. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.012 PubMed DOI

Takaori K, Bassi C, Biankin A, et al. ; IAP/EPC study group on the clinical managements of pancreatic cancer . International Association of Pancreatology (IAP)/European Pancreatic Club (EPC) consensus review of guidelines for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2016;16(1):14-27. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2015.10.013 PubMed DOI

Halle-Smith JM, Hall L, Daamen LA, et al. . Clinical benefit of surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(9):2248-2255. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.031 PubMed DOI

Ansari D, Søreide K, Andersson B, et al. ; Nordic Pancreatic Cancer Network . Surveillance after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a global scoping review of guidelines and a Nordic survey of contemporary practice. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024;59(9):1097-1104. doi:10.1080/00365521.2024.2378948 PubMed DOI

Jiang Y, Sohal DPS. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma management. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023;19(1):19-32. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00328 PubMed DOI

Daamen LA, Groot VP, Besselink MG, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Detection, treatment, and survival of pancreatic cancer recurrence in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis. Ann Surg. 2022;275(4):769-775. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004093 PubMed DOI

Groot VP, van Santvoort HC, Rombouts SJE, et al. . Systematic review on the treatment of isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after surgery; re-resection, chemoradiotherapy and SBRT. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(2):83-92. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.001 PubMed DOI

Conroy T, Castan F, Lopez A, et al. ; Canadian Cancer Trials Group and the Unicancer-GI–PRODIGE Group . Five-year outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(11):1571-1578. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3829 PubMed DOI PMC

Ghaneh P, Palmer D, Cicconi S, et al. ; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer . Immediate surgery compared with short-course neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (ESPAC5): a 4-arm, multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(2):157-168. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00348-X PubMed DOI

Sperti C, Moletta L, Merigliano S. Multimodality treatment of recurrent pancreatic cancer: mith or reality? World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7(12):375-382. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v7.i12.375 PubMed DOI PMC

Elmi A, Murphy J, Hedgire S, et al. . Post-Whipple imaging in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: association with overall survival: a multivariate analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(8):2101-2107. doi:10.1007/s00261-017-1099-2 PubMed DOI

Heerkens HD, van Vulpen M, Erickson B, et al. . MRI guided stereotactic radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1091):20170563. doi:10.1259/bjr.20170563 PubMed DOI PMC

Nordby T, Hugenschmidt H, Fagerland MW, Ikdahl T, Buanes T, Labori KJ. Follow-up after curative surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: asymptomatic recurrence is associated with improved survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(6):559-566. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.020 PubMed DOI

Tjaden C, Michalski CW, Strobel O, et al. . Clinical impact of structured follow-up after pancreatic surgery. Pancreas. 2016;45(6):895-899. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000564 PubMed DOI

Neuzillet C, Gaujoux S, Williet N, et al. ; Thésaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive (TNCD); Société Nationale Française de Gastroentérologie (SNFGE); Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD); Groupe Coopérateur multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR); Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (UNICANCER); Société Française de Chirurgie Digestive (SFCD); Société Française d’Endoscopie Digestive (SFED); Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique (SFRO); Association de Chirurgie Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique et Transplantation (ACHBT); Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC) . Pancreatic cancer: French clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC). Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(12):1257-1271. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.008 PubMed DOI

Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J, et al. . Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(20):2324-2328. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.72.4948 PubMed DOI

Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. . Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(4):439-457. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017 PubMed DOI

Okusaka T, Nakamura M, Yoshida M, et al. ; Committee for Revision of Clinical Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer of the Japan Pancreas Society . Clinical practice guidelines for pancreatic cancer 2022 from the Japan Pancreas Society: a synopsis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023;28(4):493-511. doi:10.1007/s10147-023-02317-x PubMed DOI PMC

Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(suppl 1):S31-S34. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18 PubMed DOI PMC

Henry AC, Schouten TJ, Daamen LA, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Short- and long-term outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients: a nationwide analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(9):6031-6042. doi:10.1245/s10434-022-11831-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Federatie Medisch Specialisten . Richtlijn pancreascarcinoom 2019. Accessed September 15, 2023. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/pancreascarcinoom/startpagina.html

Gilks WR. Markov chain Monte Carlo. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Wiley; 2005. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a14021 DOI

Ettrich TJ, Schulte LA, Eitel N, et al. . Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent: a multicenter survey in Germany and review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol. 2017;55(7):657-666. doi:10.1055/s-0043-105502 PubMed DOI

Gonzales BA, Diniz AL, Torres SM, et al. . Patterns of disease relapse and posttreatment follow-up of patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-center analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2022;126(4):708-717. doi:10.1002/jso.26985 PubMed DOI

Zhang D, Kruger S, Schirle K, et al. . Clinical impact of structured post-operative surveillance in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from a retrospective cohort study. Oncol Res Treat. 2023;46(3):106-115. doi:10.1159/000528722 PubMed DOI

Tzeng CWD, Fleming JB, Lee JE, et al. . Yield of clinical and radiographic surveillance in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma following multimodal therapy. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(6):365-372. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00445.x PubMed DOI PMC

Tzeng CWD, Abbott DE, Cantor SB, et al. . Frequency and intensity of postoperative surveillance after curative treatment of pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2197-2203. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-2889-6 PubMed DOI

Nong MZ, Dove D, Fischer DA, et al. . Surveillance with serial imaging and CA 19-9 tumor marker testing after resection of pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2024;47(1):25-29. doi:10.1097/COC.0000000000001052 PubMed DOI PMC

Witkowski ER, Smith JK, Ragulin-Coyne E, Ng SC, Shah SA, Tseng JF. Is it worth looking—abdominal imaging after pancreatic cancer resection: a national study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):121-128. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1699-z PubMed DOI

Samawi HH, Yin Y, Lim HJ, Cheung WY. Primary care versus oncology-based surveillance following adjuvant chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2018;49(4):429-436. doi:10.1007/s12029-017-9988-8 PubMed DOI

Wu H, Guo JC, Yang SH, Tien YW, Kuo SH. Postoperative imaging and tumor marker surveillance in resected pancreatic cancer. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1115. doi:10.3390/jcm8081115 PubMed DOI PMC

Rieser CJ, Zenati M, Hamad A, et al. . CA19-9 on postoperative surveillance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predicting recurrence and changing prognosis over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3483-3491. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6521-7 PubMed DOI

Azizian A, Rühlmann F, Krause T, et al. . CA19-9 for detecting recurrence of pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1332. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57930-x PubMed DOI PMC

van Oosten AF, Groot VP, Dorland G, et al. . Dynamics of serum CA19-9 in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2024;279(3):493-500. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005977 PubMed DOI

Barbieri M, Richardson G, Paisley S. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies after cancer treatment: a systematic literature review. Br Med Bull. 2018;126(1):85-100. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy011 PubMed DOI

van Goor IWJM, Schouten TJ, Verburg DN, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Predicting long-term disease-free survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg. 2024;279(1):132-137. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006004 PubMed DOI PMC

van Goor IWJM, Andel PCM, Buijs FS, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Prediction of isolated local recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. doi:10.1245/s10434-024-15664-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Lee B, Lipton L, Cohen J, et al. . Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(9):1472-1478. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz200 PubMed DOI PMC

Pietrasz D, Pécuchet N, Garlan F, et al. . Plasma circulating tumor DNA in pancreatic cancer patients is a prognostic marker. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(1):116-123. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0806 PubMed DOI

Daamen LA, Molenaar IQ, Groot VP. Recent advances and future challenges in pancreatic cancer care: early detection, liquid biopsies, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7485. doi:10.3390/jcm12237485 PubMed DOI PMC

Bernard V, Kim DU, San Lucas FA, et al. . Circulating nucleic acids are associated with outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(1):108-118.e4. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.022 PubMed DOI PMC

Groot VP, Mosier S, Javed AA, et al. . Circulating tumor DNA as a clinical test in resected pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(16):4973-4984. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0197 PubMed DOI PMC

Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Yu J, et al. . Circulating tumor cells dynamics in pancreatic adenocarcinoma correlate with disease status: results of the prospective CLUSTER study. Ann Surg. 2018;268(3):408-420. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002925 PubMed DOI

Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, et al. . Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(2):127-157. doi:10.3322/caac.21552 PubMed DOI PMC

Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Sterns S, Wagner LJ, Kahana B. Cancer-related health worries and psychological distress among older adult, long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2006;15(4):306-320. doi:10.1002/pon.955 PubMed DOI

Petzel MQB, Parker NH, Valentine AD, et al. . Fear of cancer recurrence after curative pancreatectomy: a cross-sectional study in survivors of pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(13):4078-4084. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2566-1 PubMed DOI PMC

Pijnappel EN, Dijksterhuis WPM, Sprangers MAG, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . The fear of cancer recurrence and progression in patients with pancreatic cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(6):4879-4887. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-06887-w PubMed DOI PMC

Recurrent disease detection after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using a standardized surveillance strategy (RADAR-PANC). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04875325. Updated September 19, 2024. Accessed October 4, 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04875325

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...