Comparative analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in cardiac surgery: a survey in Czechia and Slovakia
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
PubMed
39675571
DOI
10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.019
PII: S0195-6701(24)00403-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Antibiotic prophylaxis, Cardiac surgery, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Surgical site infection,
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky * aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- antibiotická profylaxe * metody normy MeSH
- infekce chirurgické rány * prevence a kontrola epidemiologie MeSH
- kardiochirurgické výkony * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemocnice MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Slovenská republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky * MeSH
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) in cardiac surgery significantly impact patient outcomes. This study examines cardiac antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in Czech and Slovak hospitals, crucial for reducing SSI incidence. METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted across cardiac surgery departments in both countries, focusing on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) protocols, antibiotic choices, dosages, timing and postoperative infection rates. Responses were collected over three months, ensuring a comprehensive overview. FINDINGS: Most surveyed hospitals (79%) implement SAP, but guidelines exhibit notable variability. Cefazolin dominates as the primary prophylactic choice, with varying dosing regimens. Challenges include timing inconsistencies and prolonged prophylaxis durations, particularly in implant-related procedures. Regular guideline revisions are reported in 18% of hospitals within the last year, emphasizing the need for updated practices. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of standardizing SAP practices, aligning them with evolving evidence, and implementing regular guideline revisions. The observed variations highlight opportunities for enhanced SSI prevention strategies in cardiac surgery, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org