AIMS: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a vital treatment for various paediatric malignant and nonmalignant diseases. The conditioning treatment before allo-HSCT is crucial for successful engraftment. Treosulfan, a cytotoxic prodrug, has gained popularity due to its lower toxicity compared to traditional alkylating agents used for conditioning treatment. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of treosulfan in paediatric patients, in a substudy pooling from 2 multicentre phase 2 clinical trials. A total of 83 children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases received treosulfan-based conditioning. Treosulfan exposure and its relationship with clinical outcomes, including survival, graft failure and graft-vs.-host disease, were investigated. RESULTS: Our findings reveal no significant association between treosulfan exposure and the key clinical outcomes or toxicity (P-values between .22 and .99), if the dosing is based on the approved product information. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that treosulfan exposure after standardized body surface area-based dosing is appropriate in paediatric allo-HSCT.

• MeSH
• alkylační protinádorové látky * škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• busulfan * analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• homologní transplantace * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci * metody   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• kojenec MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

The superiority of total body irradiation (TBI)-based vs chemotherapy conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been established in the international, prospective phase-3 FORUM study, randomizing 417 patients aged 4-18 years in complete remission (CR), who received allo-HSCT from HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donors. Because of the unavailability of TBI in some regions and to accommodate individual contraindications, this study reports the prespecified comparison of outcomes of patients receiving busulfan (BU)- or treosulfan (TREO)-based regimens from 2013 to 2018. Overall, 180 and 128 patients received BU/thiotepa (THIO)/fludarabine (FLU) or TREO/THIO/FLU, respectively. Data were analyzed as of February 2023, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 0.3-9.1). 3-year overall survival was 0.71 (BU, 95% confidence interval [0.64-0.77]) and 0.72 (TREO, [0.63-0.79]) and 3-year event-free survival was 0.60 (BU, [0.53-0.67]) and 0.55 (TREO, [0.46-0.63]). The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (BU, 0.31 [0.25-0.38]; TREO, 0.36 [0.27-0.44]); and nonrelapse mortality (BU, 0.08 [0.05-0.13]; TREO, 0.09 [0.05-0.15]) were comparable. One case of fatal veno-occlusive disease occurred in each group. No significant differences in acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or 3-year GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (BU, 0.48 [0.41-0.55]; TREO, 0.45 [0.37-0.54]) were recorded. Outcomes for patients in first and second CR were similar irrespective of the regimen. In conclusion, BU/THIO/FLU or TREO/THIO/FLU regimens can be an alternative to TBI for patients with ALL aged >4 years with contraindications or lack of access to TBI. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01949129.

• MeSH
• akutní lymfatická leukemie * terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• busulfan * analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• homologní transplantace MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * etiologie   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci * metody   MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• vidarabin analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

• MeSH
• busulfan terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * etiologie   MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * metody   MeSH
• vidarabin terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly effective for treating pediatric high-risk or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For young children, total body irradiation (TBI) is associated with severe late sequelae. In the FORUM study (NCT01949129), we assessed safety, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) of 2 TBI-free conditioning regimens in children aged <4 years with ALL. Patients received fludarabine (Flu), thiotepa (Thio), and either busulfan (Bu) or treosulfan (Treo) before HSCT. From 2013 to 2021, 191 children received transplantation and were observed for ≥6 months (median follow-up: 3 years). The 3-year OS was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52-0.72) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84) for Flu/Thio/Bu and Flu/Thio/Treo (P = .075), respectively. Three-year EFS was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.41-0.61) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.39-0.62), respectively (P = .794). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse at 3 years were 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.12) vs 0.03 (95% CI: <0.01-0.09) (P = .406) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.52) vs 0.45 (95% CI, 0.34-0.56) (P = .920), respectively. Grade >1 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 29% of patients receiving Flu/Thio/Bu and 17% of those receiving Flu/Thio/Treo (P = .049), whereas grade 3/4 occurred in 10% and 9%, respectively (P = .813). The 3-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.13) vs 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.11), respectively (P = .518). In conclusion, both chemotherapeutic conditioning regimens were well tolerated and NRM was low. However, relapse was the major cause of treatment failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01949129.

• MeSH
• akutní lymfatická leukemie * etiologie   MeSH
• busulfan * analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * etiologie   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• thiotepa terapeutické užití   MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

PURPOSE: Ewing 2008R3 was conducted in 12 countries and evaluated the effect of treosulfan and melphalan high-dose chemotherapy (TreoMel-HDT) followed by reinfusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in high-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients had disseminated EWS with metastases to bone and/or other sites, excluding patients with only pulmonary metastases. Patients received six cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction and eight cycles of vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide consolidation therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive additional TreoMel-HDT or no further treatment (control). The random assignment was stratified by number of bone metastases (1, 2-5, and > 5). The one-sided adaptive-inverse-normal-4-stage-design was changed after the first interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2018, 109 patients were randomly assigned, and 55 received TreoMel-HDT. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, there was no significant difference in EFS between TreoMel-HDT and control in the adaptive design (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.32, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS was 20.9% (95% CI, 11.5 to 37.9) in TreoMel-HDT and 19.2% (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.4) in control patients. The results were similar in the per-protocol collective. Males treated with TreoMel-HDT had better EFS compared with controls: median 1.0 years (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.2) versus 0.6 years (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9); P = .035; HR 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97). Patients age < 14 years benefited from TreoMel-HDT with a 3-years EFS of 39.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 75.8%) versus 9% (95% CI, 2.4 to 34); P = .016; HR 0.40 (0.19 to 0.87). These effects were similar in the per-protocol collective. This observation is supported by comparable results from the nonrandomized trial EE99R3. CONCLUSION: In patients with very high-risk EWS, additional TreoMel-HDT was of no benefit for the entire cohort of patients. TreoMel-HDT may be of benefit for children age < 14 years.

• MeSH
• busulfan analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• cyklofosfamid MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• doxorubicin MeSH
• etoposid MeSH
• Ewingův sarkom * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• konsolidační chemoterapie MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• melfalan MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• vinkristin MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients affected by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS). Reported HSCT outcomes have improved over time with respect to overall survival, but some studies have identified older age and HSCT from alternative donors as risk factors predicting poorer outcome. We analyzed 197 patients undergoing transplant at European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers between 2006 and 2017 who received conditioning as recommended by the Inborn Errors Working Party (IEWP): either busulfan (n = 103) or treosulfan (n = 94) combined with fludarabine ± thiotepa. After a median follow-up post-HSCT of 44.9 months, 176 patients were alive, resulting in a 3-year overall survival of 88.7% and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free survival (events include death, graft failure, and severe chronic GVHD) of 81.7%. Overall survival and chronic GVHD-free survival were not significantly affected by conditioning regimen (busulfan- vs treosulfan-based), donor type (matched sibling donor/matched family donor vs matched unrelated donor/mismatched unrelated donor vs mismatched family donor), or period of HSCT (2006-2013 vs 2014-2017). Patients aged <5 years at HSCT had a significantly better overall survival. The overall cumulative incidences of grade III to IV acute GVHD and extensive/moderate/severe chronic GVHD were 6.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Patients receiving treosulfan-based conditioning had a higher incidence of graft failure and mixed donor chimerism and more frequently underwent secondary procedures (second HSCT, unconditioned stem cell boost, donor lymphocyte infusion, or splenectomy). In summary, HSCT for WAS with conditioning regimens currently recommended by IEWP results in excellent survival and low rates of GVHD, regardless of donor or stem cell source, but age ≥5 years remains a risk factor for overall survival.

• MeSH
• busulfan terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dárci tkání MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * etiologie   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Wiskottův-Aldrichův syndrom * terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

Optimal conditioning for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has not been established so far. We retrospectively compared outcomes for two myeloablative regimens: fludarabine + total body irradiation (Flu-TBI, n = 117) and thiotepa + iv. busulfan + fludarabine (TBF, n = 119). Patients transplanted either in complete remission (CR) or with active disease were included in the analysis. The characteristics of both groups were comparable except for patients treated with TBF were older. In univariate analysis the incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years was increased for TBF compared to Flu-TBI (31% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.03). There was a tendency towards reduced incidence of relapse after TBF (p = 0.11). Results of multivariate analysis confirmed a reduced risk of NRM using Flu-TBI (HR = 0.49, p = 0.03). In the analysis restricted to patients treated in CR1 or CR2, the use of Flu-TBI was associated with a decreased risk of NRM (HR = 0.34, p = 0.009) but an increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.59, p = 0.01) without significant effect on survival and graft-versus-host disease. We conclude that for haplo-HCT recipients with ALL, Flu-TBI may be preferable for individuals at high risk of NRM while TBF should be considered in cases at high risk of relapse.

• MeSH
• akutní lymfatická leukemie * komplikace   terapie   MeSH
• akutní myeloidní leukemie * terapie   MeSH
• busulfan škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• celotělové ozáření škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli * etiologie   MeSH
• příprava pacienta k transplantaci metody   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• thiotepa škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• vidarabin analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is efficacious, but long-term side effects are concerning. We investigated whether preparative combination chemotherapy could replace TBI in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FORUM is a randomized, controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, phase III, noninferiority study. Patients ≤ 18 years at diagnosis, 4-21 years at HSCT, in complete remission pre-HSCT, and with an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor were randomly assigned to myeloablative conditioning with fractionated 12 Gy TBI and etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan. The noninferiority margin was 8%. With 1,000 patients randomly assigned in 5 years, 2-year minimum follow-up, and one-sided alpha of 5%, 80% power was calculated. A futility stopping rule would halt random assignment if chemoconditioning was significantly inferior to TBI (EudraCT: 2012-003032-22; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949129). RESULTS: Between April 2013 and December 2018, 543 patients were screened, 417 were randomly assigned, 212 received TBI, and 201 received chemoconditioning. The stopping rule was applied on March 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P < .0001) versus chemoconditioning (0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P < .0001) and 0.02 (95% CI, < 0.01 to 0.05; P = .0269) following TBI and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.40) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14) following chemoconditioning, respectively. CONCLUSION: Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. We therefore recommend TBI plus etoposide for patients > 4 years old with high-risk ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

• MeSH
• akutní lymfatická leukemie patologie   terapie   MeSH
• busulfan aplikace a dávkování   analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• celotělové ozáření mortalita   MeSH
• chemoradioterapie mortalita   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• etoposid aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• hodnocení ekvivalence jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mezinárodní agentury MeSH
• míra přežití MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   MeSH
• thiotepa aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• vidarabin aplikace a dávkování   analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• MeSH
• busulfan MeSH
• chronická myeloidní leukemie * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• hydroxymočovina MeSH
• imatinib mesylát MeSH
• inhibitory proteinkinas MeSH
• interferon alfa MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• protinádorové látky MeSH
• transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

Terapie polycytemia vera (pravá polycytemie PV) je založena na výsledcích řady kontrolovaných klinických studií a na dlouhodobých klinických zkušenostech s příslušnými léky, které jsou zobrazeny v aktuálních národních i mezinárodních doporučených postupech. Obecně u léků používaných při terapii PV není tato indikace uvedena mezi oficiálně schválenými indikacemi obsaženými v souhrnu údajů o přípravku, což může při jejich preskripci vést k řadě složitých právních situací. Současně pak absence indikace PV může být spojena s problémy se zajištěním plné úhrady alespoň jednoho léčivého přípravku odpovídajícího potřebám konkrétního pacienta. V současné době je v České republice v indikaci PV platné rozhodnutí o úhradě interferonu-α2a (Roferon), ačkoliv tato indikace není uvedena v jeho SPC, což může vést při použití k právním komplikacím. Hrazen je také perorálně podávaný busulfan ( Myleran), jehož mutagenita a kancerogenita však představují významné omezení pro jeho použití. Aktuálně je v indikaci PV registrovaný a dostupný pegylovaný ropeginterferon-α2b (Besremi). Žádná jiná úhrada v indikaci polycytemia vera není regulační autoritou stanovena (s výjimkou anagrelidu). Autoři proto shrnují stávající judikaturu a uvádějí, jakým způsobem postupovat při preskripci příslušných léků u pacientů s PV.

• Klíčová slova
• ropeginterferon alfa2b (Besremi), interferon alfa2b (Introna), peginterferon alfa2b (Pegasys), peginterferon alfa2b (PegIntron),
• MeSH
• busulfan aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• hydroxymočovina škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• interferon alfa-2 aplikace a dávkování   ekonomika   MeSH
• interferony aplikace a dávkování   ekonomika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lékové předpisy ekonomika   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• náklady na léky MeSH
• off-label použití léčivého přípravku zákonodárství a právo   MeSH
• polycythaemia vera ekonomika   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• polyethylenglykoly terapeutické užití   MeSH
• všeobecné zdravotní pojištění MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH