Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; P = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib v chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 v 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 v 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.

• MeSH
• deoxycytidin analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• doxorubicin analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• ftalaziny * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• gemcitabin MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie   genetika   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• paclitaxel aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• PARP inhibitory * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• piperaziny * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• polyethylenglykoly aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• protein BRCA1 genetika   MeSH
• protein BRCA2 genetika   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• topotekan aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) is an inflamed phenotype with poor outcomes when meeting high-risk criteria and limited treatment options in the adjuvant setting. We report protocol-prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with dMMR tumors from the phase III ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04634877) in newly diagnosed, high-risk EC after surgery with curative intent. Patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo (six cycles) plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (four to six cycles) once every 3 weeks, then pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo once every 6 weeks (six cycles), respectively. MMR status was a stratification factor. Patients received radiotherapy at investigator discretion. Investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) was a primary end point. No formal hypothesis testing was performed for subgroup analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, 141 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 140 in the placebo arm had dMMR tumors. At this interim analysis, hazard ratio for DFS favored pembrolizumab (0.31 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.69]); median DFS was not reached in either group. Two-year DFS rates were 92.4% (95% CI, 84.4 to 96.4) and 80.2% (95% CI, 70.8 to 86.9), respectively. No new safety signals occurred. Longer-term follow-up of outcomes will be evaluated at final analysis. Preplanned subgroup analysis on the basis of the study's stratification factors suggests that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improves DFS and is clinically relevant for patients with dMMR tumors in the curative-intent setting.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• karboplatina aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory endometria * patologie   farmakoterapie   mortalita   terapie   MeSH
• oprava chybného párování bází DNA * MeSH
• paclitaxel * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: In the ARIEL4 trial of rucaparib versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed BRCA-mutated ovarian carcinoma, the primary endpoint was met, showing improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival with rucaparib. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis of the trial and other post-progression outcomes. METHODS: This open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial was done at 64 hospitals and cancer centres in 12 countries, including Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were women aged 18 or older with BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma and had received at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. Patients had to have evaluable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive response technology and block randomisation (block size of six) and stratified by progression-free interval after the most recent platinum-containing therapy to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily administered in 28-day cycles) or chemotherapy on the basis of platinum-sensitivity status. In the chemotherapy group, patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression-free interval ≥1 to <6 months) or partially platinum-sensitive disease (progression-free interval ≥6 to <12 months) received weekly paclitaxel (starting dose 60-80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15). Patients with fully platinum-sensitive disease (progression-free interval ≥12 months) received the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy (single-agent cisplatin or carboplatin, or platinum-doublet chemotherapy), in 21-day or 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint (previously reported) was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, assessed in the efficacy population (all randomly assigned patients with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations without reversion mutations) and in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). Overall survival was a prespecified secondary endpoint and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned study treatment. The cutoff date was April 10, 2022. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02855944; enrolment is complete and the study is closed. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2017, and Sept 24, 2020, 349 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive rucaparib (n=233) or chemotherapy (n=116). 332 (95%) of 349 patients were white and 17 (5%) patients were other or of unknown race. In the chemotherapy group, 80 (69%) of 116 patients crossed over to receive rucaparib. Median follow-up was 41·2 months (IQR 37·8-44·6). At data cutoff for this final analysis (April 10, 2022), 244 (70%) of 349 patients had died: 167 (72%) of 233 in the rucaparib group and 77 (66%) of 116 in the rucaparib group. Median overall survival was 19·4 months (95% CI 15·2-23·6) in the rucaparib group versus 25·4 months (21·4-27·6) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·7], p=0·047). No new safety signals were observed, including during crossover to rucaparib. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events across treatment groups included anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (reported in 59 [25%] of 232 patients in the rucaparib group and seven [6%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group), and neutropenia or decreased neutrophil count (in 26 [11%] of 232 in the rucaparib group and 16 [14%] of 113 patients in the chemotherapy group). Serious adverse events were reported in 66 (28%) of 232 patients in the rucaparib group and 14 (12%) of 113 patients in the chemotherapy group. Ten treatment-related deaths were reported in the rucaparib group, two of which were linked to judged to be related to rucaparib (cardiac disorder and myelodysplastic syndrome), and one death related to treatment was reported in the chemotherapy group, with no specific cause linked to the treatment. INTERPRETATION: These data highlight the need for a better understanding of the most appropriate treatment for patients who have progressed on a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer. FUNDING: Clovis Oncology.

• MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• indoly * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * farmakoterapie   genetika   patologie   MeSH
• mutace * MeSH
• nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie   genetika   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• paclitaxel aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• PARP inhibitory terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• protein BRCA1 * genetika   MeSH
• protein BRCA2 * genetika   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Current therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is based on drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-eluting balloon catheters. This prospective randomized study compared the efficacy of a novel sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) catheter to that of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) catheter for the treatment of bare-metal stent (BMS-ISR) or DES-ISR. METHODS: A total of 145 patients with 158 BMS or DES-ISR lesions were randomly assigned to the treatment with either SEB or PEB. The in-segment late lumen loss at 12 months, the 12-month incidence of binary ISR, and major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) were compared between groups. RESULTS: The noninferiority of SEB compared with PEB in the treatment of BMS/DES-ISR with respect to late lumen loss was not demonstrated (Δlate lumen loss, -0.024 mm [95% CI, -0.277 to 0.229]; for a noninferiority margin of 0.20 mm), except in the post hoc subanalysis for the BMS-ISR group (-0.203 mm [95% CI, -0.584 to 0.178]). No significant differences in the incidence of repeated binary ISR (31.6% versus 30.4%, P=0.906) or 12-month major adverse cardiac events (31% for both; P>0.999) between the SEB and PEB groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The noninferiority of SEB relative to PEB in the treatment of BMS/DES-ISR with respect to late lumen loss was not confirmed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03667313.

• MeSH
• balónková koronární angioplastika * škodlivé účinky   přístrojové vybavení   MeSH
• biokompatibilní potahované materiály * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• kardiovaskulární látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• koronární angioplastika * škodlivé účinky   přístrojové vybavení   MeSH
• koronární restenóza * diagnostické zobrazování   terapie   mortalita   etiologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoci koronárních tepen * diagnostické zobrazování   terapie   mortalita   MeSH
• paclitaxel * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protézy - design MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sirolimus * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• srdeční katétry MeSH
• stenty uvolňující léky škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• stenty škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• hodnocení ekvivalence MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

PURPOSE: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression. The pivotal, phase 3 ENGOT-ov50/GOG-3029/INNOVATE-3 study evaluated efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy with paclitaxel (PTX) vs PTX in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with PROC with ≤ 5 total prior lines of therapy (LOT), including ≤ 2 prior LOT for platinum-resistant disease, and ECOG PS of 0-1 were randomized 1:1 to receive TTFields (200 kHz; ≥ 18 h/day) + PTX (80 mg/m2 weekly) or PTX. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Exploratory post-hoc analyses assessed OS in pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-naive patients. RESULTS: Between March 2019 and November 2021, 558 patients (ECOG PS 0, 60.2 %; median [range] age, 62 [22-91] years) were assigned TTFields+PTX (n = 280) or PTX (n = 278). 24.4 % had 4 + prior LOT. Median OS was 12.2 months with TTFields+PTX vs 11.9 months with PTX (HR, 1.01; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.24; p = 0.89). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar between treatment groups. Grade 1/2 device-related skin AEs occurred in 83.6 % of patients receiving TTFields therapy. In exploratory post-hoc analysis in PLD-naive patients, median OS was 16 months with TTFields+PTX (n = 113) vs 11.7 months with PTX (n = 88; nominal HR, 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.49-0.94; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: No new safety signals were identified. TTFields+PTX did not significantly improve OS compared with PTX in the intent-to-treat population. An exploratory post-hoc analysis suggests a potentially favorable benefit-risk profile for TTFields therapy in PLD-naive patients.

• MeSH
• chemorezistence * MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• elektrostimulační terapie metody   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie   terapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• paclitaxel * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

PURPOSE: Patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) are virtually insensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) employed as standalone therapeutics, at least in part reflecting microenvironmental immunosuppression. Thus, conventional chemotherapeutics and targeted anticancer agents that not only mediate cytotoxic effects but also promote the recruitment of immune effector cells to the HGSOC microenvironment stand out as promising combinatorial partners for ICIs in this oncological indication. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We harnessed a variety of transcriptomic, spatial, and functional assays to characterize the differential impact of neoadjuvant paclitaxel-carboplatin on the immunological configuration of paired primary and metastatic HGSOC biopsies as compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-naïve HGSOC samples from five independent patient cohorts. RESULTS: We found NACT-driven endoplasmic reticulum stress and calreticulin exposure in metastatic HGSOC lesions culminates with the establishment of a dense immune infiltrate including follicular T cells (TFH cells), a prerequisite for mature tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) formation. In this context, TLS maturation was associated with an increased intratumoral density of ICI-sensitive TCF1+PD1+ CD8+ T cells over their ICI-insensitive TIM-3+PD1+ counterparts. Consistent with this notion, chemotherapy coupled with a PD1-targeting ICI provided a significant survival benefit over either therapeutic approach in syngeneic models of HGSOC bearing high (but not low) tumor mutational burden. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, our findings suggest that NACT promotes TLS formation and maturation in HGSOC lesions, de facto preserving an intratumoral ICI-sensitive T-cell phenotype. These observations emphasize the role of rational design, especially relative to the administration schedule, for clinical trials testing chemotherapy plus ICIs in patients with HGSOC. See related commentary by Bravo Melgar and Laoui, p. 10.

• MeSH
• CD8-pozitivní T-lymfocyty * imunologie   účinky léků   MeSH
• ektopické lymfoidní struktury * imunologie   patologie   MeSH
• hepatocytární jaderný faktor 1-alfa * genetika   metabolismus   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   MeSH
• karboplatina aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádorové mikroprostředí * imunologie   účinky léků   MeSH
• nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie   imunologie   patologie   MeSH
• neoadjuvantní terapie metody   MeSH
• paclitaxel aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   farmakologie   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   farmakologie   MeSH
• serózní cystadenokarcinom farmakoterapie   patologie   imunologie   MeSH
• stres endoplazmatického retikula účinky léků   imunologie   MeSH
• tumor infiltrující lymfocyty imunologie   účinky léků   metabolismus   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

OBJECTIVES: Part 1 of the RUBY trial (NCT03981796) demonstrated improved survival in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel. Here, we examine additional efficacy and safety data from patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) EC in the RUBY trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to dostarlimab 500 mg or placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by dostarlimab or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. In the dMMR/MSI-H population of RUBY Part 1, analysis of progression-free survival by investigator assessment compared with blinded independent central review, sensitivity analyses of the source-verified population compared with the randomized population, and analysis of safety in this population were completed. RESULTS: In total, 118 patients with dMMR/MSI-H were enrolled in the RUBY trial (53, dostarlimab arm; 65, placebo arm). At the first interim analysis, a 72% reduction in the risk of progression or death (P < 0.0001) was seen with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), which was consistent with blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Likewise, sensitivity analyses of the source-verified dMMR/MSI-H population compared with the randomized dMMR/MSI-H population were consistent for progression-free survival and overall survival. Safety results seen in the dMMR/MSI-H population were similar to those previously reported for the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: All primary and secondary efficacy assessments demonstrate the consistent benefit of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel. The improvements seen in survival and the manageable safety profile support the favorable benefit-risk profile for dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with dMMR/MSI-H primary advanced or recurrent EC.

• MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• karboplatina * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• mikrosatelitní nestabilita MeSH
• nádory endometria * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• oprava chybného párování bází DNA MeSH
• paclitaxel * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• Klíčová slova
• dostarlimab, studie RUBY,
• MeSH
• analýza přežití MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• imunoterapie metody   MeSH
• karboplatina farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory endometria * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• paclitaxel farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH

Metastatický duktální karcinom pankreatu (metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – mPDAC) patří mezi maligní onemocnění s nejvyšší letalitou. Dnešní terapeutické možnosti zahrnují podle doporučení Evropské společnosti pro klinickou onkologii (ESMO) v 1. linii dublet chemoterapii gemcitabin + nab-paklitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) nebo modifikovaný režim FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) a u pacientů v horším celkovém stavu monoterapii gemcitabinem. Nepřímé srovnání základních studií s Gem/Nab-P a mFOLFIRINOX v porovnání s gemcitabinem v monoterapii (PRODIGE-4 a MPACT) naznačilo delší celkové přežití (overall survival – OS) u pacientů s mFOLFIRINOX. Je ale třeba vzít v úvahu, že do studie MPACT s Gem/Nab-P byli zařazováni pacienti s celkově horším výkonnostním stavem. Přímé porovnání těchto režimů chemoterapie chybělo. Nepřímá porovnání z reálné praxe ukazují jejich srovnatelnou účinnost z hlediska OS, přežití bez progrese i podílu léčebných odpovědí, konzistentně odlišný je profil bezpečnosti. Nedávno publikovaná studie fáze II/III GENERATE, která přímo porovnávala Gem/Nab-P a mFOLFIRINOX u nepředléčených pacientů s mPDAC, prokázala významně delší OS u pacientů léčených Gem/Nab-P přesahující 17 měsíců při nižší incidenci nehematologické toxicity. Výsledky vyvolaly na kongresu ESMO 2023 živou diskuzi. Porovnání Gem/Nab-P a mFOLFIRINOX se ve své prezentaci na konferenci PragueONCO 2024 věnoval i prof. Prager, který vyzdvihl minimálně srovnatelnou účinnost obou režimů a lepší bezpečnost Gem/Nab-P a doložil přínos Gem/Nab-P také u pacientů starších 70 let a pacientů s výkonnostním stavem (performance status – PS) podle Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 2. Je třeba také vzít v úvahu, že volba 1. linie léčby určuje terapeutické možnosti ve 2. linii. Při aplikaci Gem/Nab-P lze dnes ve 2. linii využít pegylovaný lipozomální irinotekan (nal-IRI) v kombinaci s 5-fluorouracilem a leukovorinem (5-FU/LV), který prokázal prodloužení OS v porovnání s 5-FU/LV ve studii III. fáze NAPOLI-1. U pacientů předléčených režimem mFOLFIRINOX lze ve 2. linii využít gemcitabin nebo Gem/Nab-P. Včasné vyšetření molekulárních prediktivních parametrů umožní identifikovat případy, pro které je k dispozici vhodná cílená léčba nebo imunoterapie.

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal carcinoma (mPDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines recommend a gemcitabine doublet + nab-paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) or a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFOLFIRINOX) as options for systemic chemotherapy. Gemcitabine monotherapy is an option for patients in a worse performance status (PS). Indirect comparisons of pivotal trials with Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX vs. gemcitabine monotherapy (PRODIGE-4 and MPACT) indicated longer overall survival (OS) in patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX. However, it should be taken into account that the MPACT study with Gem/Nab-P included patients with an overall worse performance status. A direct comparison of these chemotherapy regimens was lacking. Indirect comparisons from real practice show their comparable effectiveness in terms of OS, progression-free survival and overall response rate. The safety profile is consistently different. The recently published phase II/III GENERATE trial, which directly compared Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX in treatment-na?ve mPDAC patients, demonstrated significantly longer OS in Gem/Nab-P-treated patients exceeding 17 months with a lower incidence of non-hematologic toxicity. The results sparked a lively discussion at the ESMO 2023 Congress. The comparison of Gem/Nab-P and mFOLFIRINOX was also addressed by prof. Prager in his presentation at the PragueONCO 2024 conference. Prager, who highlighted comparable efficacy of both regimens and better safety of Gem/Nab-P and demonstrated the benefit of Gem/Nab-P also in patients older than 70 years and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. It should also be taken into account that the choice of first line treatment determines the therapeutic options in the 2nd line. If the Gem/Nab-P regimen is used in the first line, pegylated liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) can be used in the second line. This regimen demonstrated prolongation of OS compared to 5-FU/LV in phase III study NAPOLI-1. In patients pretreated with the mFOLFIRINOX regimen, gemcitabine monotherapy or Gem/Nab-P can be used in the second line. Early examination of molecular predictive parameters will enable the identification of cases for which appropriate targeted therapy or immunotherapy is available.

• Klíčová slova
• studie GENERATE, FOLFIRINOX,
• MeSH
• duktální karcinom slinivky břišní farmakoterapie   mortalita   sekundární   MeSH
• gemcitabin * farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• irinotekan farmakologie   klasifikace   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kombinovaná farmakoterapie metody   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• míra přežití MeSH
• paclitaxel * farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• multicentrická studie MeSH

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the preferred treatment option in locally advanced breast cancer (BC). The administration of NAC is associated with a wide range of adverse effects. This pilot observational prospective study examined the effect of NAC using anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (PTx) on a portfolio of 22 plasma and urinary amino acids, plasma proteins (albumin, prealbumin, transferrin), and products of nitrogen metabolism (urea, creatinine, uric acid) in plasma and urine. Plasma and 24-h urine samples were obtained from ten patients with early breast cancer (N1-3 N0-2 M0), at the following time points: before the start of NAC and during the AC/PTx treatment period (a total of 8 measurements at three-weekly intervals). Amino acids were analyzed using ion exchange chromatography. There were no significant differences in the measured parameters in plasma and urine between pre-NAC and during AC- and PTx-treatment. No trend was detected. A significant difference in the portfolio of plasma and urinary amino acids was found only in the pre-treatment period compared to the control group. Levels of eight plasma amino acids (8/22) were significantly reduced and those of nine urine amino acids were increased (9/22). Nitrogenous catabolites in plasma and urine were not indicative of increased protein catabolism during the anthracycline and taxane treatment periods. A slightly positive nitrogen balance was accompanied by an average weight gain of 3.3 kg (range 0-6 kg). The AC/PTx treatment regimen did not cause significant changes in the monitored laboratory parameters.

• MeSH
• aminokyseliny * moč   krev   MeSH
• antracykliny terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• cyklofosfamid * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dusík * moč   MeSH
• kreatinin moč   krev   MeSH
• krevní proteiny * metabolismus   analýza   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory prsu * farmakoterapie   krev   moč   MeSH
• neoadjuvantní terapie * MeSH
• paclitaxel * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• pilotní projekty MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH