-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A fresh look at growth assessment of infants and young children in the Czech Republic in context of international developments
Jana Vignerová, Lída Lhotská
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Plný text - Část
Číslo
Ročník
Zdroj
Zdroj
Zdroj
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed
16830613
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a3371
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antropometrie metody MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- finanční podpora výzkumu jako téma MeSH
- fyziologie výživy dětí fyziologie MeSH
- kojení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- referenční standardy MeSH
- růst a vývoj fyziologie MeSH
- Světová zdravotnická organizace MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
The growth charts of basic body measurements are an important aid for the daily routine practice of paediatricians. Charts for children from birth to 2 years of age form an integral component of a set of such tools for the age spectrum from birth to 18 years of age. The interpretation of growth charts is highly dependent on the data on basis of which the charts were constructed. In the Czech Republic, the growth reference data have been regularly updated since 1951, in 10-year intervals. These updates are based on data from nation-wide anthropological surveys of children and adolescents. Countries, which do not have their own reference data, have been using for growth assessment the 1977 World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) international reference growth charts. These charts, developed for height for age, weight for age, and weight for height, were based for children younger than 2 years on a longitudinal study of North American children. Over the years, use in practice showed that because of the original criteria used to select the child population studied, these reference growth charts were not suitable for assessing growth of breastfed children. The 1977 reference is based on predominantly artificially, that is formula-fed, child population. The evidence shows that breastfed and artificially fed infants grow differently and that the growth pattern of breastfed children most likely better reflects physiological growth. In 1994, based on the accumulated evidence, the WHO started working on new international standards which would be based on a sample of healthy breastfed children. The project, the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS), was carried out from 1997–2003. It focused on collection of growth and development data of 8440 children from different ethnic and cultural groups. The underlying assumption of the project was that in favourable socio-economic conditions and with a recommended level of nutrition and lack of maternal smoking, children’s growth is very similar, regardless of their ethnic origin and geographic location. The new growth standard for children 0–5 years of age will be available early in 2006. In the Czech Republic, we plan to analyse our national reference against this standard. If considered necessary, a process will be put in place for replacing the Czech reference with the WHO standard. The objective of this article is to alert health professionals that growth charts currently used in their country may not represent an optimal tool, especially with regard to the assessment of nutritional status for 0 to 2-year-old children, unless already based on data of breastfed children. Generally, the lack of awareness of the difference between the two growth patterns – the breastfed versus artificially fed child – poses a serious problem since a strict interpretation of the growth charts may lead to early supplementation of breastmilk with infant formula and/or premature introduction of complementary foods. Both of these practices tend to lead to premature cessation of breastfeeding, one of the key strategies to improve child health and development.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Lit. 22
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07003934
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221006145704.0
- 008
- 070405s2006 xr u eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a3371 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)16830613
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Vignerová, Jana, $d 1946- $4 aut $7 xx0059614
- 245 12
- $a A fresh look at growth assessment of infants and young children in the Czech Republic in context of international developments / $c Jana Vignerová, Lída Lhotská
- 314 __
- $a Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, National Institute of Public Health, Prague 10, CZ
- 504 __
- $a Lit. 22
- 520 9_
- $a The growth charts of basic body measurements are an important aid for the daily routine practice of paediatricians. Charts for children from birth to 2 years of age form an integral component of a set of such tools for the age spectrum from birth to 18 years of age. The interpretation of growth charts is highly dependent on the data on basis of which the charts were constructed. In the Czech Republic, the growth reference data have been regularly updated since 1951, in 10-year intervals. These updates are based on data from nation-wide anthropological surveys of children and adolescents. Countries, which do not have their own reference data, have been using for growth assessment the 1977 World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) international reference growth charts. These charts, developed for height for age, weight for age, and weight for height, were based for children younger than 2 years on a longitudinal study of North American children. Over the years, use in practice showed that because of the original criteria used to select the child population studied, these reference growth charts were not suitable for assessing growth of breastfed children. The 1977 reference is based on predominantly artificially, that is formula-fed, child population. The evidence shows that breastfed and artificially fed infants grow differently and that the growth pattern of breastfed children most likely better reflects physiological growth. In 1994, based on the accumulated evidence, the WHO started working on new international standards which would be based on a sample of healthy breastfed children. The project, the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS), was carried out from 1997–2003. It focused on collection of growth and development data of 8440 children from different ethnic and cultural groups. The underlying assumption of the project was that in favourable socio-economic conditions and with a recommended level of nutrition and lack of maternal smoking, children’s growth is very similar, regardless of their ethnic origin and geographic location. The new growth standard for children 0–5 years of age will be available early in 2006. In the Czech Republic, we plan to analyse our national reference against this standard. If considered necessary, a process will be put in place for replacing the Czech reference with the WHO standard. The objective of this article is to alert health professionals that growth charts currently used in their country may not represent an optimal tool, especially with regard to the assessment of nutritional status for 0 to 2-year-old children, unless already based on data of breastfed children. Generally, the lack of awareness of the difference between the two growth patterns – the breastfed versus artificially fed child – poses a serious problem since a strict interpretation of the growth charts may lead to early supplementation of breastmilk with infant formula and/or premature introduction of complementary foods. Both of these practices tend to lead to premature cessation of breastfeeding, one of the key strategies to improve child health and development.
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a referenční standardy $7 D012015
- 650 _2
- $a růst a vývoj $x fyziologie $7 D048788
- 650 _2
- $a Světová zdravotnická organizace $7 D014944
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologie výživy dětí $x fyziologie $7 D002664
- 650 _2
- $a kojení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D001942
- 650 _2
- $a antropometrie $x metody $7 D000886
- 650 _2
- $a finanční podpora výzkumu jako téma $7 D012109
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Lhotská, Ludmila $4 aut $7 xx0064141
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $g Roč. 14, č. 2 (2006), s. 97-100 $x 1210-7778
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 0 $z 0
- 913 __
- $a CZ $b NJ 6792 Česko. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví. Interní grantová agentura
- 913 __
- $a CZ $b NR 7857 Česko. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví. Interní grantová agentura
- 990 __
- $a 20070419 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221006145658 $b ABA008
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2006 $b 14 $c 2 $d 97-100 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $x MED00001083