-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding
[Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích]
Stephan M. Perren
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
- MeSH
- fixace fraktury MeSH
- hojení fraktur fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Our understanding of fracture healing has undergone an evolution over many decades with continuous improvement of fracture treatment. Solid union is a precondition of restoring the function of a fractured bone. The goal of the early treatment of the fracture was focussed upon enabling solid union in acceptable alignment of the fracture. This was achieved with reduction followed by application of external splints. The function of the articulations was often troubled by long lasting and extensive external immobilization, which required physiotherapy that lasted longer than bone union. The surgical reduction and stabilization aimed at early recovery of movement of the articulations and maintenance of the function of the soft tissues and blood supply. The AO group initiated 1958 by Maurice E. Müller and his colleagues prioritized the recovery of limb function and propagated precise reduction and fixation using mainly compression. Absolute stability of fixation, achieved using implants, allowed to move the articulations very early without pain, while the fracture united solidly. After such treatment the implants could not be removed before 1 1/2 to 2 years without risking increased incidence of re-fracture. This was in sharp contrast to the fact that after conservative treatment the bone was solidly united after 2 to 3 months. The analysis of this situation revealed that internal remodelling after absolutely stable fixation did not recognize the presence of the fracture. Primary healing, therefore, is not a healing in the strict sense of the word but a side effect of internal removal of necrotic bone. To maintain early function of the limb and stimulate the healing process the so called biological internal fixation was developed. It combines minimal surgical trauma, acceptable rather than precise reduction and flexible fixation usually achieved with so called internal fixateurs. Flexibility of mind and of tools aims at safe and early healing with full recovery of function and minimal risk of biological complications.
Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích
Lit.: 7
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07520360
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210131107.0
- 008
- 090401s2008 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2008/044
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Perren, S. M. $q (Stephan M.), $d 1932- $7 nlk20030128130
- 245 10
- $a Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding / $c Stephan M. Perren
- 246 11
- $a Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích
- 314 __
- $a AO Development Institute, Davos
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 7
- 520 9_
- $a Our understanding of fracture healing has undergone an evolution over many decades with continuous improvement of fracture treatment. Solid union is a precondition of restoring the function of a fractured bone. The goal of the early treatment of the fracture was focussed upon enabling solid union in acceptable alignment of the fracture. This was achieved with reduction followed by application of external splints. The function of the articulations was often troubled by long lasting and extensive external immobilization, which required physiotherapy that lasted longer than bone union. The surgical reduction and stabilization aimed at early recovery of movement of the articulations and maintenance of the function of the soft tissues and blood supply. The AO group initiated 1958 by Maurice E. Müller and his colleagues prioritized the recovery of limb function and propagated precise reduction and fixation using mainly compression. Absolute stability of fixation, achieved using implants, allowed to move the articulations very early without pain, while the fracture united solidly. After such treatment the implants could not be removed before 1 1/2 to 2 years without risking increased incidence of re-fracture. This was in sharp contrast to the fact that after conservative treatment the bone was solidly united after 2 to 3 months. The analysis of this situation revealed that internal remodelling after absolutely stable fixation did not recognize the presence of the fracture. Primary healing, therefore, is not a healing in the strict sense of the word but a side effect of internal removal of necrotic bone. To maintain early function of the limb and stimulate the healing process the so called biological internal fixation was developed. It combines minimal surgical trauma, acceptable rather than precise reduction and flexible fixation usually achieved with so called internal fixateurs. Flexibility of mind and of tools aims at safe and early healing with full recovery of function and minimal risk of biological complications.
- 650 _2
- $a fixace fraktury $7 D005592
- 650 _2
- $a hojení fraktur $x fyziologie $7 D017102
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 75, č. 4 (2008), s. 247-252 $x 0001-5415
- 856 41
- $u http://www.achot.cz/dwnld/0804_241.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 9
- 990 __
- $a 20090331130745 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20090401161250 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 638163 $s 490962
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 75 $c 4 $d 247-252 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $a 2009-13/mkme