Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding
[Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích]

Stephan M. Perren

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07520360

Our understanding of fracture healing has undergone an evolution over many decades with continuous improvement of fracture treatment. Solid union is a precondition of restoring the function of a fractured bone. The goal of the early treatment of the fracture was focussed upon enabling solid union in acceptable alignment of the fracture. This was achieved with reduction followed by application of external splints. The function of the articulations was often troubled by long lasting and extensive external immobilization, which required physiotherapy that lasted longer than bone union. The surgical reduction and stabilization aimed at early recovery of movement of the articulations and maintenance of the function of the soft tissues and blood supply. The AO group initiated 1958 by Maurice E. Müller and his colleagues prioritized the recovery of limb function and propagated precise reduction and fixation using mainly compression. Absolute stability of fixation, achieved using implants, allowed to move the articulations very early without pain, while the fracture united solidly. After such treatment the implants could not be removed before 1 1/2 to 2 years without risking increased incidence of re-fracture. This was in sharp contrast to the fact that after conservative treatment the bone was solidly united after 2 to 3 months. The analysis of this situation revealed that internal remodelling after absolutely stable fixation did not recognize the presence of the fracture. Primary healing, therefore, is not a healing in the strict sense of the word but a side effect of internal removal of necrotic bone. To maintain early function of the limb and stimulate the healing process the so called biological internal fixation was developed. It combines minimal surgical trauma, acceptable rather than precise reduction and flexible fixation usually achieved with so called internal fixateurs. Flexibility of mind and of tools aims at safe and early healing with full recovery of function and minimal risk of biological complications.

Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 7

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc07520360
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210131107.0
008      
090401s2008 xr e cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2008/044
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Perren, S. M. $q (Stephan M.), $d 1932- $7 nlk20030128130
245    10
$a Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding / $c Stephan M. Perren
246    11
$a Hojení zlomenin - evoluční změny v našich poznatcích
314    __
$a AO Development Institute, Davos
504    __
$a Lit.: 7
520    9_
$a Our understanding of fracture healing has undergone an evolution over many decades with continuous improvement of fracture treatment. Solid union is a precondition of restoring the function of a fractured bone. The goal of the early treatment of the fracture was focussed upon enabling solid union in acceptable alignment of the fracture. This was achieved with reduction followed by application of external splints. The function of the articulations was often troubled by long lasting and extensive external immobilization, which required physiotherapy that lasted longer than bone union. The surgical reduction and stabilization aimed at early recovery of movement of the articulations and maintenance of the function of the soft tissues and blood supply. The AO group initiated 1958 by Maurice E. Müller and his colleagues prioritized the recovery of limb function and propagated precise reduction and fixation using mainly compression. Absolute stability of fixation, achieved using implants, allowed to move the articulations very early without pain, while the fracture united solidly. After such treatment the implants could not be removed before 1 1/2 to 2 years without risking increased incidence of re-fracture. This was in sharp contrast to the fact that after conservative treatment the bone was solidly united after 2 to 3 months. The analysis of this situation revealed that internal remodelling after absolutely stable fixation did not recognize the presence of the fracture. Primary healing, therefore, is not a healing in the strict sense of the word but a side effect of internal removal of necrotic bone. To maintain early function of the limb and stimulate the healing process the so called biological internal fixation was developed. It combines minimal surgical trauma, acceptable rather than precise reduction and flexible fixation usually achieved with so called internal fixateurs. Flexibility of mind and of tools aims at safe and early healing with full recovery of function and minimal risk of biological complications.
650    _2
$a fixace fraktury $7 D005592
650    _2
$a hojení fraktur $x fyziologie $7 D017102
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 75, č. 4 (2008), s. 247-252 $x 0001-5415
856    41
$u http://www.achot.cz/dwnld/0804_241.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 9
990    __
$a 20090331130745 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20090401161250 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 638163 $s 490962
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 75 $c 4 $d 247-252 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$a 2009-13/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...