-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bendable vs. angulated dental implants: consideration of elastic and plastic material properties based on experimental implant material data and FEA
Tomas Goldmann, Stefan Ihde, Jiri Kuzelka, Lucie Himmlova
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
- MeSH
- analýza metodou konečných prvků statistika a číselné údaje využití MeSH
- analýza zatížení zubů metody využití MeSH
- anatomické modely MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- návrh zubní protézy klasifikace normy MeSH
- pevnost v tahu MeSH
- statistika jako téma MeSH
- zubní implantáty klasifikace normy využití MeSH
- zubní náhrady - baze klasifikace normy využití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Aim: Bendable and angulated single-piece implants are used alternatively to screwable abutments in two-piecedental implant designs. Though used frequently, data on the stress distribution within such implants are not availableand the question whether the bending contributes to fracture resistance has not been addressed. Methods: We used the method of fi nite element to identify von Mises stresses and maximum stresses in bent andnon-bent but angulated implants. Implants with one (e.g. applicable to screw designs) or two (applicable to basalimplants) bending areas were the variables under investigation. Results: For bends up to 13 degrees we discovered that if there is only one bend, the maximum stress is in the bentarea. If two bends are made in two diff erent bending areas, the maximum stresses are distributed between the twoand, if either one of the bent areas is machined, there are no residual stresses within the implant body in this area.The maximum stresses are always located near the base-plates. The absolute value of the maximum stress is higherbecause no residual stresses are available to compensate stresses that stem from loading.Conclusion: Assuming that all other parameters are equal, bendable (basal) implants show a more even stress distributionalong the vertical implant region than identically shaped implants with a machine-angulated area. Bendablebasal implants therefore probably resist masticatory forces better than pre-angulated, machined implants, and unbentimplants which provide a thin region in the vertical implant area.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Lit.: 13
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10009480
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170623104500.0
- 008
- 100421s2008 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2008.049 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19219226
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Goldmann, Tomáš, $d 1974- $7 ntka172443
- 245 10
- $a Bendable vs. angulated dental implants: consideration of elastic and plastic material properties based on experimental implant material data and FEA / $c Tomas Goldmann, Stefan Ihde, Jiri Kuzelka, Lucie Himmlova
- 314 __
- $a Czech Technical University in Prague, Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Prague
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 13
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: Bendable and angulated single-piece implants are used alternatively to screwable abutments in two-piecedental implant designs. Though used frequently, data on the stress distribution within such implants are not availableand the question whether the bending contributes to fracture resistance has not been addressed. Methods: We used the method of fi nite element to identify von Mises stresses and maximum stresses in bent andnon-bent but angulated implants. Implants with one (e.g. applicable to screw designs) or two (applicable to basalimplants) bending areas were the variables under investigation. Results: For bends up to 13 degrees we discovered that if there is only one bend, the maximum stress is in the bentarea. If two bends are made in two diff erent bending areas, the maximum stresses are distributed between the twoand, if either one of the bent areas is machined, there are no residual stresses within the implant body in this area.The maximum stresses are always located near the base-plates. The absolute value of the maximum stress is higherbecause no residual stresses are available to compensate stresses that stem from loading.Conclusion: Assuming that all other parameters are equal, bendable (basal) implants show a more even stress distributionalong the vertical implant region than identically shaped implants with a machine-angulated area. Bendablebasal implants therefore probably resist masticatory forces better than pre-angulated, machined implants, and unbentimplants which provide a thin region in the vertical implant area.
- 650 _2
- $a zubní implantáty $x klasifikace $x normy $x využití $7 D015921
- 650 _2
- $a zubní náhrady - baze $x klasifikace $x normy $x využití $7 D003819
- 650 _2
- $a návrh zubní protézy $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D003779
- 650 _2
- $a anatomické modely $7 D008953
- 650 _2
- $a analýza zatížení zubů $x metody $x využití $7 D003799
- 650 _2
- $a analýza metodou konečných prvků $x statistika a číselné údaje $x využití $7 D020342
- 650 _2
- $a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
- 650 _2
- $a pevnost v tahu $7 D013718
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 700 1_
- $a Ihde, Stefan
- 700 1_
- $a Kuželka, Jiří. $7 _AN047675
- 700 1_
- $a Himmlová, Lucie $7 xx0074009
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers $g Roč. 152, č. 2 (2008), s. 309-316 $x 1213-8118
- 856 41
- $u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/pdfs/bio/2008/02/21.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 8 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20100419115931 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170623104920 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 723355 $s 586470
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 152 $c 2 $d 309-316 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $a 2010-22/dkal