Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Bendable vs. angulated dental implants: consideration of elastic and plastic material properties based on experimental implant material data and FEA

Tomas Goldmann, Stefan Ihde, Jiri Kuzelka, Lucie Himmlova

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc10009480

Aim: Bendable and angulated single-piece implants are used alternatively to screwable abutments in two-piecedental implant designs. Though used frequently, data on the stress distribution within such implants are not availableand the question whether the bending contributes to fracture resistance has not been addressed. Methods: We used the method of fi nite element to identify von Mises stresses and maximum stresses in bent andnon-bent but angulated implants. Implants with one (e.g. applicable to screw designs) or two (applicable to basalimplants) bending areas were the variables under investigation. Results: For bends up to 13 degrees we discovered that if there is only one bend, the maximum stress is in the bentarea. If two bends are made in two diff erent bending areas, the maximum stresses are distributed between the twoand, if either one of the bent areas is machined, there are no residual stresses within the implant body in this area.The maximum stresses are always located near the base-plates. The absolute value of the maximum stress is higherbecause no residual stresses are available to compensate stresses that stem from loading.Conclusion: Assuming that all other parameters are equal, bendable (basal) implants show a more even stress distributionalong the vertical implant region than identically shaped implants with a machine-angulated area. Bendablebasal implants therefore probably resist masticatory forces better than pre-angulated, machined implants, and unbentimplants which provide a thin region in the vertical implant area.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 13

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10009480
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170623104500.0
008      
100421s2008 xr e eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2008.049 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)19219226
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Goldmann, Tomáš, $d 1974- $7 ntka172443
245    10
$a Bendable vs. angulated dental implants: consideration of elastic and plastic material properties based on experimental implant material data and FEA / $c Tomas Goldmann, Stefan Ihde, Jiri Kuzelka, Lucie Himmlova
314    __
$a Czech Technical University in Prague, Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Prague
504    __
$a Lit.: 13
520    9_
$a Aim: Bendable and angulated single-piece implants are used alternatively to screwable abutments in two-piecedental implant designs. Though used frequently, data on the stress distribution within such implants are not availableand the question whether the bending contributes to fracture resistance has not been addressed. Methods: We used the method of fi nite element to identify von Mises stresses and maximum stresses in bent andnon-bent but angulated implants. Implants with one (e.g. applicable to screw designs) or two (applicable to basalimplants) bending areas were the variables under investigation. Results: For bends up to 13 degrees we discovered that if there is only one bend, the maximum stress is in the bentarea. If two bends are made in two diff erent bending areas, the maximum stresses are distributed between the twoand, if either one of the bent areas is machined, there are no residual stresses within the implant body in this area.The maximum stresses are always located near the base-plates. The absolute value of the maximum stress is higherbecause no residual stresses are available to compensate stresses that stem from loading.Conclusion: Assuming that all other parameters are equal, bendable (basal) implants show a more even stress distributionalong the vertical implant region than identically shaped implants with a machine-angulated area. Bendablebasal implants therefore probably resist masticatory forces better than pre-angulated, machined implants, and unbentimplants which provide a thin region in the vertical implant area.
650    _2
$a zubní implantáty $x klasifikace $x normy $x využití $7 D015921
650    _2
$a zubní náhrady - baze $x klasifikace $x normy $x využití $7 D003819
650    _2
$a návrh zubní protézy $x klasifikace $x normy $7 D003779
650    _2
$a anatomické modely $7 D008953
650    _2
$a analýza zatížení zubů $x metody $x využití $7 D003799
650    _2
$a analýza metodou konečných prvků $x statistika a číselné údaje $x využití $7 D020342
650    _2
$a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
650    _2
$a pevnost v tahu $7 D013718
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
700    1_
$a Ihde, Stefan
700    1_
$a Kuželka, Jiří. $7 _AN047675
700    1_
$a Himmlová, Lucie $7 xx0074009
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers $g Roč. 152, č. 2 (2008), s. 309-316 $x 1213-8118
856    41
$u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/pdfs/bio/2008/02/21.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 8 $z 0
990    __
$a 20100419115931 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170623104920 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 723355 $s 586470
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 152 $c 2 $d 309-316 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $x MED00012606
LZP    __
$a 2010-22/dkal

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...