• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Hamstringy versus quadriceps u dvousvazkových rekonstrukcí předního zkříženého vazu
[Hamstring versus quadriceps tendon graft in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

R. Hart, B. Kučera, A, Safi

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc10033225

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate functional outcomes and knee joint stability after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three-tunnel quadriceps tendon-bone graft and four-tunnel hamstring graft (semi-tendinosus and gracilis muscles). MATERIAL Group 1 included 20 patients undergoing reconstruction with quadriceps tendon- bone graft group; 2 comprised of 20 patients treated by hamstring graft. There were 26 men and 14 women, with an average age of 27 (range, 16 to 44) years. The minimum follow-up period was one year. METHODS In group 1 patients, semi-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed by a three-tunnel technique (two tunnels in the femur and one in the tibia) using quadriceps femoris muscle graft. Group 2 patients were treated by anatomic four-tunnel reconstruction (two tunnels in the femur and two in the tibia) with the use of hamstring graft. Functional outcomes were evaluated on the basis of Lysholm and IKDC scores. Antero-posterior stability was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer and rotational stability was assessed by the pivot-shift test. For statistical evaluation, the level of significance (p) was set at < 0.05. RESULTS The final evaluation showed an average Lysholm score of 88.9 + 12 (76-100) points for group 1, and 87.9 + 11 (62-100) points for group 2; there was no statistically significant difference. The rounded average result of the functional IKDC score after surgery was the same in the two groups (80 +10). The joints treated by the three-tunnel technique had on average better antero-posterior stability, but this was not statistically significant. The pivot-shift phenomenon was not seen in either of the groups. Operative times in both groups were comparable. An intra-operative fracture of the patella occurred in two patients of group 1. DISCUSSION No similar prospective study comparing the outcomes of the methods reported here has been found in the international literature. The studies so far published have not included any such comparison or they compared other techniques, such as single- versus double-bundle reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS Based on Lysholm and IKDC score evaluation and antero-posterior and rotational stability assessment, it can be concluded that both the three- and the four-tunnel technique of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction gave similar results, with no significant differences, at one-year follow-up. However, these are only short-term results and only a long-term follow-up can prove or disprove the validity of this conclusion.

Hamstring versus quadriceps tendon graft in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 25

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10033225
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210195950.0
008      
101129s2010 xr e cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2010/055
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Hart, Radek, $d 1967- $7 xx0010068
245    10
$a Hamstringy versus quadriceps u dvousvazkových rekonstrukcí předního zkříženého vazu / $c R. Hart, B. Kučera, A, Safi
246    11
$a Hamstring versus quadriceps tendon graft in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
314    __
$a Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení, Nemocnice, Znojmo
504    __
$a Lit.: 25
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate functional outcomes and knee joint stability after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three-tunnel quadriceps tendon-bone graft and four-tunnel hamstring graft (semi-tendinosus and gracilis muscles). MATERIAL Group 1 included 20 patients undergoing reconstruction with quadriceps tendon- bone graft group; 2 comprised of 20 patients treated by hamstring graft. There were 26 men and 14 women, with an average age of 27 (range, 16 to 44) years. The minimum follow-up period was one year. METHODS In group 1 patients, semi-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed by a three-tunnel technique (two tunnels in the femur and one in the tibia) using quadriceps femoris muscle graft. Group 2 patients were treated by anatomic four-tunnel reconstruction (two tunnels in the femur and two in the tibia) with the use of hamstring graft. Functional outcomes were evaluated on the basis of Lysholm and IKDC scores. Antero-posterior stability was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer and rotational stability was assessed by the pivot-shift test. For statistical evaluation, the level of significance (p) was set at < 0.05. RESULTS The final evaluation showed an average Lysholm score of 88.9 + 12 (76-100) points for group 1, and 87.9 + 11 (62-100) points for group 2; there was no statistically significant difference. The rounded average result of the functional IKDC score after surgery was the same in the two groups (80 +10). The joints treated by the three-tunnel technique had on average better antero-posterior stability, but this was not statistically significant. The pivot-shift phenomenon was not seen in either of the groups. Operative times in both groups were comparable. An intra-operative fracture of the patella occurred in two patients of group 1. DISCUSSION No similar prospective study comparing the outcomes of the methods reported here has been found in the international literature. The studies so far published have not included any such comparison or they compared other techniques, such as single- versus double-bundle reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS Based on Lysholm and IKDC score evaluation and antero-posterior and rotational stability assessment, it can be concluded that both the three- and the four-tunnel technique of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction gave similar results, with no significant differences, at one-year follow-up. However, these are only short-term results and only a long-term follow-up can prove or disprove the validity of this conclusion.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ligamentum cruciatum anterius $x chirurgie $7 D016118
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a čtyřhlavý sval stehenní $x chirurgie $7 D052097
650    _2
$a zákroky plastické chirurgie $x metody $7 D019651
650    _2
$a šlachy $x transplantace $7 D013710
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Kučera, Bořek $7 xx0083643
700    1_
$a Safi, Adel $7 xx0095639
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 77, č. 4 (2010), s. 296-303 $x 0001-5415
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 7
990    __
$a 20101128104731 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110124104252 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 821427 $s 687025
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 77 $c 4 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021 $d 296-303
LZP    __
$a 2010-52/ipme

Najít záznam