• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The upper paleolithic burial area at Predmosti: ritual and taphonomy

Svoboda J A

. 2008 ; 54 (1) : 15-33.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu historické články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11003098

Paleoanthropological materials from Predmosti, recovered by J. Wankel in 1884, K.J. Maska in 1894, M. Kriz in 1895, and K. Absolon in 1928 (and probably 1930), represent one of the largest collections of early modern human remains. Unfortunately, most of these fossils were destroyed in 1945. The aim of this paper is to create a list of finds in accordance with the discovery dates, to place them into the spatial and chronological context of the site, and to compare them with the evidence from recent excavation in 2006. Two competing hypotheses are raised in the literature suggesting that the Predmosti individuals represent either a contemporary burial as a consequence of one catastrophic event, or a gradual accumulation of human bodies at one place. Whereas the first hypothesis is supported by the demographic structure of the buried group, including adults and children, the second interpretation is based on stratigraphic and taphonomic analysis of the burial area itself. Using the original documentation of Maska and other early researchers, and my own experience from recent excavation in the remaining part of the site, I attempt to reconstruct the plan of the site, with a focus on spatial distribution of the human fossils, especially in the main burial area. I suggest that the burial place was not the settlement center, but rather a peripheral and task-specific area. The determining factor for location of the burial area was likely the remarkable Skalka rock, a cliff that rose directly above the site. A long-term tendency to place the dead "below the rock" may have given rise to the accumulation of human remains at a single place, with a scatter of dispersed fragments in the vicinity. At this location, the human bodies were partly protected by soil coverage, limestone debris, and mammoth scapulae, but were also affected by postdepositional processes such as redeposition of sediments, predator activities, and later human activities, including the burial of additional corpses.

000      
03158naa 2200313 a 4500
001      
bmc11003098
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121123114430.0
008      
110518s2008 xxk e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Svoboda, Jiří A., $d 1953- $7 jn99240001149
245    14
$a The upper paleolithic burial area at Predmosti: ritual and taphonomy / $c Svoboda J A
314    __
$a Institute of Archaeology at Brno, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic CZ-69129 Dolni Vestonice 25, Czech Republic. svoboda@iabrno.cz <svoboda@iabrno.cz>
520    9_
$a Paleoanthropological materials from Predmosti, recovered by J. Wankel in 1884, K.J. Maska in 1894, M. Kriz in 1895, and K. Absolon in 1928 (and probably 1930), represent one of the largest collections of early modern human remains. Unfortunately, most of these fossils were destroyed in 1945. The aim of this paper is to create a list of finds in accordance with the discovery dates, to place them into the spatial and chronological context of the site, and to compare them with the evidence from recent excavation in 2006. Two competing hypotheses are raised in the literature suggesting that the Predmosti individuals represent either a contemporary burial as a consequence of one catastrophic event, or a gradual accumulation of human bodies at one place. Whereas the first hypothesis is supported by the demographic structure of the buried group, including adults and children, the second interpretation is based on stratigraphic and taphonomic analysis of the burial area itself. Using the original documentation of Maska and other early researchers, and my own experience from recent excavation in the remaining part of the site, I attempt to reconstruct the plan of the site, with a focus on spatial distribution of the human fossils, especially in the main burial area. I suggest that the burial place was not the settlement center, but rather a peripheral and task-specific area. The determining factor for location of the burial area was likely the remarkable Skalka rock, a cliff that rose directly above the site. A long-term tendency to place the dead "below the rock" may have given rise to the accumulation of human remains at a single place, with a scatter of dispersed fragments in the vicinity. At this location, the human bodies were partly protected by soil coverage, limestone debris, and mammoth scapulae, but were also affected by postdepositional processes such as redeposition of sediments, predator activities, and later human activities, including the burial of additional corpses.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a pohřeb $x dějiny $7 D002048
650    _2
$a rituální chování $7 D002562
650    _2
$a zkameněliny $7 D005580
650    _2
$a dějiny starověku $7 D049690
650    _2
$a Hominidae $7 D015186
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a paleontologie $7 D010163
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a historické články $7 D016456
773    0_
$t Journal of Human Evolution $w MED00002718 $g Roč. 54, č. 1 (2008), s. 15-33 $x 0047-2484
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 1
990    __
$a 20110413114425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121123114453 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 830470 $s 695090
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 54 $c 1 $d 15-33 $i 0047-2484 $m Journal of Human Evolution $n J Hum Evol $x MED00002718
LZP    __
$a 2011-2B/dkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...