-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The upper paleolithic burial area at Predmosti: ritual and taphonomy
Svoboda J A
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu historické články
- MeSH
- dějiny starověku MeSH
- Hominidae MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- paleontologie MeSH
- pohřeb dějiny MeSH
- rituální chování MeSH
- zkameněliny MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- dějiny starověku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- historické články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Paleoanthropological materials from Predmosti, recovered by J. Wankel in 1884, K.J. Maska in 1894, M. Kriz in 1895, and K. Absolon in 1928 (and probably 1930), represent one of the largest collections of early modern human remains. Unfortunately, most of these fossils were destroyed in 1945. The aim of this paper is to create a list of finds in accordance with the discovery dates, to place them into the spatial and chronological context of the site, and to compare them with the evidence from recent excavation in 2006. Two competing hypotheses are raised in the literature suggesting that the Predmosti individuals represent either a contemporary burial as a consequence of one catastrophic event, or a gradual accumulation of human bodies at one place. Whereas the first hypothesis is supported by the demographic structure of the buried group, including adults and children, the second interpretation is based on stratigraphic and taphonomic analysis of the burial area itself. Using the original documentation of Maska and other early researchers, and my own experience from recent excavation in the remaining part of the site, I attempt to reconstruct the plan of the site, with a focus on spatial distribution of the human fossils, especially in the main burial area. I suggest that the burial place was not the settlement center, but rather a peripheral and task-specific area. The determining factor for location of the burial area was likely the remarkable Skalka rock, a cliff that rose directly above the site. A long-term tendency to place the dead "below the rock" may have given rise to the accumulation of human remains at a single place, with a scatter of dispersed fragments in the vicinity. At this location, the human bodies were partly protected by soil coverage, limestone debris, and mammoth scapulae, but were also affected by postdepositional processes such as redeposition of sediments, predator activities, and later human activities, including the burial of additional corpses.
- 000
- 03158naa 2200313 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11003098
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121123114430.0
- 008
- 110518s2008 xxk e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Svoboda, Jiří A., $d 1953- $7 jn99240001149
- 245 14
- $a The upper paleolithic burial area at Predmosti: ritual and taphonomy / $c Svoboda J A
- 314 __
- $a Institute of Archaeology at Brno, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic CZ-69129 Dolni Vestonice 25, Czech Republic. svoboda@iabrno.cz <svoboda@iabrno.cz>
- 520 9_
- $a Paleoanthropological materials from Predmosti, recovered by J. Wankel in 1884, K.J. Maska in 1894, M. Kriz in 1895, and K. Absolon in 1928 (and probably 1930), represent one of the largest collections of early modern human remains. Unfortunately, most of these fossils were destroyed in 1945. The aim of this paper is to create a list of finds in accordance with the discovery dates, to place them into the spatial and chronological context of the site, and to compare them with the evidence from recent excavation in 2006. Two competing hypotheses are raised in the literature suggesting that the Predmosti individuals represent either a contemporary burial as a consequence of one catastrophic event, or a gradual accumulation of human bodies at one place. Whereas the first hypothesis is supported by the demographic structure of the buried group, including adults and children, the second interpretation is based on stratigraphic and taphonomic analysis of the burial area itself. Using the original documentation of Maska and other early researchers, and my own experience from recent excavation in the remaining part of the site, I attempt to reconstruct the plan of the site, with a focus on spatial distribution of the human fossils, especially in the main burial area. I suggest that the burial place was not the settlement center, but rather a peripheral and task-specific area. The determining factor for location of the burial area was likely the remarkable Skalka rock, a cliff that rose directly above the site. A long-term tendency to place the dead "below the rock" may have given rise to the accumulation of human remains at a single place, with a scatter of dispersed fragments in the vicinity. At this location, the human bodies were partly protected by soil coverage, limestone debris, and mammoth scapulae, but were also affected by postdepositional processes such as redeposition of sediments, predator activities, and later human activities, including the burial of additional corpses.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a pohřeb $x dějiny $7 D002048
- 650 _2
- $a rituální chování $7 D002562
- 650 _2
- $a zkameněliny $7 D005580
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny starověku $7 D049690
- 650 _2
- $a Hominidae $7 D015186
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a paleontologie $7 D010163
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 773 0_
- $t Journal of Human Evolution $w MED00002718 $g Roč. 54, č. 1 (2008), s. 15-33 $x 0047-2484
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20110413114425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121123114453 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 830470 $s 695090
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 54 $c 1 $d 15-33 $i 0047-2484 $m Journal of Human Evolution $n J Hum Evol $x MED00002718
- LZP __
- $a 2011-2B/dkme