• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Revision of Khawia spp. (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of cyprinid fish, including a key to their identification and molecular phylogeny

Tomáš Scholz, Jan Brabec, Ivica Kráľová-Hromadová, Mikuláš Oros, Eva Bazsalovicsová, Alexey Ermolenko, Vladimíra Hanzelová

. 2011 ; 58 (3) : 197-223.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12000221

Monozoic cestodes of the genus Khawia Hsü, 1935 (Caryophyllidea: Lytocestidae), parasites of cyprinid fish in Europe, Asia, Africa and North America, are revised on the basis of taxonomic evaluation of extensive materials, including recently collected specimens of most species. This evaluation has made it possible to critically assess the validity of all 17 nominal species of the genus and to provide redescriptions of the following seven species considered to be valid: Khawia sinensis Hsü, 1935 (type species); K. armeniaca (Cholodkovsky, 1915); K. baltica Szidat, 1941; K. japonensis (Yamaguti, 1934); K. parva (Zmeev, 1936); K. rossittensis (Szidat, 1937); and K. saurogobii Xi, Oros, Wang, Wu, Gao et Nie, 2009. Several new synonyms are proposed: Khawia barbi Rahemo et Mohammad, 2002 and K. lutei Al-Kalak et Rahemo, 2003 are synonymized with K. armeniaca; K. coregoni Kritscher, 1990 with Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) (family Caryophyllaeidae); K. cyprini Li, 1964 and K. iowensis Calentine et Ulmer, 1961 with K. japonensis; K. dubia (Szidat, 1937) (syn. Bothrioscolex dubius Szidat, 1937) with K. rossittensis; and Tsengia neimongkuensis Li, 1964 and T. xiamenensis Liu, Yang et Lin, 1995 with K. sinensis. Khawia prussica (Szidat, 1937) (syn. Bothrioscolex prussicus Szidat, 1937) is considered to be species incertae sedis, but its morphology indicates it may belong to Caryophyllaeus Gmelin, 1790 (Caryophyllaeidae). The molecular analysis of all seven valid species, based on comparison of sequences of two nuclear ribosomal and two mitochondrial genes, has shown that the species form three major groups clustered according to their fish hosts. Five species from common and crucian carp and goldfish were grouped together, whereas K. armeniaca from barbels (Barbinae) and K. baltica from tench (Tinca) formed separate clades. In contrast, geographical distribution does not seem to play a crucial role in grouping of individual taxa. A phylogenetic tree based on morphological characters was incongruent with that inferred from molecular data, which indicates that some morphological traits may be homoplastic. A key to identification of all species of Khawia based on morphological characteristics is provided.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Obsahuje 4 tabulky

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12000221
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20120123102515.0
007      
ta
008      
120111s2011 xr fd f 000 0eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14411/fp.2011.020 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Scholz, Tomáš, $d 1960- $7 ola2003204900 $u Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, and Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budĕjovice
245    10
$a Revision of Khawia spp. (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of cyprinid fish, including a key to their identification and molecular phylogeny / $c Tomáš Scholz, Jan Brabec, Ivica Kráľová-Hromadová, Mikuláš Oros, Eva Bazsalovicsová, Alexey Ermolenko, Vladimíra Hanzelová
500    __
$a Obsahuje 4 tabulky
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Monozoic cestodes of the genus Khawia Hsü, 1935 (Caryophyllidea: Lytocestidae), parasites of cyprinid fish in Europe, Asia, Africa and North America, are revised on the basis of taxonomic evaluation of extensive materials, including recently collected specimens of most species. This evaluation has made it possible to critically assess the validity of all 17 nominal species of the genus and to provide redescriptions of the following seven species considered to be valid: Khawia sinensis Hsü, 1935 (type species); K. armeniaca (Cholodkovsky, 1915); K. baltica Szidat, 1941; K. japonensis (Yamaguti, 1934); K. parva (Zmeev, 1936); K. rossittensis (Szidat, 1937); and K. saurogobii Xi, Oros, Wang, Wu, Gao et Nie, 2009. Several new synonyms are proposed: Khawia barbi Rahemo et Mohammad, 2002 and K. lutei Al-Kalak et Rahemo, 2003 are synonymized with K. armeniaca; K. coregoni Kritscher, 1990 with Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) (family Caryophyllaeidae); K. cyprini Li, 1964 and K. iowensis Calentine et Ulmer, 1961 with K. japonensis; K. dubia (Szidat, 1937) (syn. Bothrioscolex dubius Szidat, 1937) with K. rossittensis; and Tsengia neimongkuensis Li, 1964 and T. xiamenensis Liu, Yang et Lin, 1995 with K. sinensis. Khawia prussica (Szidat, 1937) (syn. Bothrioscolex prussicus Szidat, 1937) is considered to be species incertae sedis, but its morphology indicates it may belong to Caryophyllaeus Gmelin, 1790 (Caryophyllaeidae). The molecular analysis of all seven valid species, based on comparison of sequences of two nuclear ribosomal and two mitochondrial genes, has shown that the species form three major groups clustered according to their fish hosts. Five species from common and crucian carp and goldfish were grouped together, whereas K. armeniaca from barbels (Barbinae) and K. baltica from tench (Tinca) formed separate clades. In contrast, geographical distribution does not seem to play a crucial role in grouping of individual taxa. A phylogenetic tree based on morphological characters was incongruent with that inferred from molecular data, which indicates that some morphological traits may be homoplastic. A key to identification of all species of Khawia based on morphological characteristics is provided.
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Cestoda $x anatomie a histologie $x genetika $x klasifikace $7 D002589
650    _2
$a Cyprinidae $x parazitologie $7 D003530
650    _2
$a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
700    1_
$a Brabec, Jan. $7 stk2007405199 $u nstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, and Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budĕjovice
700    1_
$a Kráľová-Hromadová, Ivica $7 xx0104780 $u Parasitological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice
700    1_
$a Oros, Mikuláš. $7 _AN055381 $u Parasitological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice
700    1_
$a Bazsalovicsová, Eva. $7 xx0194757 $u Parasitological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice
700    1_
$a Ermolenko, Alexey $u Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok
700    1_
$a Hanzelová, Vladimíra, $d 1951- $7 xx0062998 $u Parasitological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice
773    0_
$t Folia parasitologica $x 0015-5683 $g Roč. 58, č. 3 (2011), s. 197-223 $w MED00011006
856    41
$u https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/2011/03/04.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 2854 $c 558 a $y 2
990    __
$a 20120111131035 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20120123102501 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 892886 $s 756892
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 58 $c 3 $d 197-223 $i 0015-5683 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
LZP    __
$a 2012-01/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...