• Something wrong with this record ?

Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces

V. Pivonkova, A. Rubesova, J. Lindova, J. Havlicek

. 2011 ; 40 (6) : 1137-1143.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2004-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago

Individuals tend to judge personality traits on the basis of physical characteristics, particularly facial traits, although this phenomenon has been mostly studied in relation to the halo effect of attractiveness. However, there are other facial traits which may also have an impact on personality attributions; here, we focused on masculinity. We carried out principal component analysis (PCA) of 15 anthropometric measurements from 71 male faces, resulting in three components: Face Height (C1), Inner Face Breadth (C2), and Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence (C3). The targets' photographs were rated by 210 women and 177 men on scales for masculinity, attractiveness, and nine psychological characteristics (selected Cattell's factors): Warmth, Reasoning, Emotional Stability, Dominance, Liveliness, Rule-Consciousness, Social Boldness, Abstractedness, and Privateness. We found that masculinity correlated positively with ratings of Dominance and Social Boldness and that masculinity rated by men correlated positively with ratings of Emotional Stability and Privateness. We found no relationship between masculinity rated by women and the PCA components, while masculinity rated by men correlated negatively with C2 (possibly related to babyface features) and positively with C3 (which included features developed under the control of testosterone, such as jaw prominence). Our results imply sex differences in masculinity ratings. In particular, men used Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence and Inner Face Breadth as cues for masculinity judgments; on the other hand, women apparently perceive masculinity in a more holistic way.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12022117
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151013143753.0
007      
ta
008      
120806s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10508-011-9821-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21901645
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pivoňková, Věra, $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1971- $7 jo2009330745
245    10
$a Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces / $c V. Pivonkova, A. Rubesova, J. Lindova, J. Havlicek
520    9_
$a Individuals tend to judge personality traits on the basis of physical characteristics, particularly facial traits, although this phenomenon has been mostly studied in relation to the halo effect of attractiveness. However, there are other facial traits which may also have an impact on personality attributions; here, we focused on masculinity. We carried out principal component analysis (PCA) of 15 anthropometric measurements from 71 male faces, resulting in three components: Face Height (C1), Inner Face Breadth (C2), and Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence (C3). The targets' photographs were rated by 210 women and 177 men on scales for masculinity, attractiveness, and nine psychological characteristics (selected Cattell's factors): Warmth, Reasoning, Emotional Stability, Dominance, Liveliness, Rule-Consciousness, Social Boldness, Abstractedness, and Privateness. We found that masculinity correlated positively with ratings of Dominance and Social Boldness and that masculinity rated by men correlated positively with ratings of Emotional Stability and Privateness. We found no relationship between masculinity rated by women and the PCA components, while masculinity rated by men correlated negatively with C2 (possibly related to babyface features) and positively with C3 (which included features developed under the control of testosterone, such as jaw prominence). Our results imply sex differences in masculinity ratings. In particular, men used Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence and Inner Face Breadth as cues for masculinity judgments; on the other hand, women apparently perceive masculinity in a more holistic way.
650    _2
$a antropometrie $7 D000886
650    _2
$a krása $7 D001504
650    _2
$a obličej $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005145
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mužskost $7 D057228
650    _2
$a osobnost $7 D010551
650    _2
$a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Rubešová, Anna, $d 1981- $7 _AN055439 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lindová, Jitka, $d 1976- $7 _AN043183 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Havlíček, Jan, $d 1974- $7 mzk2004228328 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00000562 $t Archives of sexual behavior $x 1573-2800 $g Roč. 40, č. 6 (2011), s. 1137-1143
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21901645 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120806 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151013143942 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 944030 $s 779414
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 40 $c 6 $d 1137-1143 $i 1573-2800 $m Archives of sexual behavior $n Arch Sex Behav $x MED00000562
LZP    __
$b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...