-
Something wrong with this record ?
Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces
V. Pivonkova, A. Rubesova, J. Lindova, J. Havlicek
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2004-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Anthropometry MeSH
- Beauty MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Masculinity MeSH
- Face anatomy & histology MeSH
- Personality MeSH
- Sex Characteristics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Individuals tend to judge personality traits on the basis of physical characteristics, particularly facial traits, although this phenomenon has been mostly studied in relation to the halo effect of attractiveness. However, there are other facial traits which may also have an impact on personality attributions; here, we focused on masculinity. We carried out principal component analysis (PCA) of 15 anthropometric measurements from 71 male faces, resulting in three components: Face Height (C1), Inner Face Breadth (C2), and Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence (C3). The targets' photographs were rated by 210 women and 177 men on scales for masculinity, attractiveness, and nine psychological characteristics (selected Cattell's factors): Warmth, Reasoning, Emotional Stability, Dominance, Liveliness, Rule-Consciousness, Social Boldness, Abstractedness, and Privateness. We found that masculinity correlated positively with ratings of Dominance and Social Boldness and that masculinity rated by men correlated positively with ratings of Emotional Stability and Privateness. We found no relationship between masculinity rated by women and the PCA components, while masculinity rated by men correlated negatively with C2 (possibly related to babyface features) and positively with C3 (which included features developed under the control of testosterone, such as jaw prominence). Our results imply sex differences in masculinity ratings. In particular, men used Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence and Inner Face Breadth as cues for masculinity judgments; on the other hand, women apparently perceive masculinity in a more holistic way.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022117
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151013143753.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10508-011-9821-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21901645
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Pivoňková, Věra, $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1971- $7 jo2009330745
- 245 10
- $a Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces / $c V. Pivonkova, A. Rubesova, J. Lindova, J. Havlicek
- 520 9_
- $a Individuals tend to judge personality traits on the basis of physical characteristics, particularly facial traits, although this phenomenon has been mostly studied in relation to the halo effect of attractiveness. However, there are other facial traits which may also have an impact on personality attributions; here, we focused on masculinity. We carried out principal component analysis (PCA) of 15 anthropometric measurements from 71 male faces, resulting in three components: Face Height (C1), Inner Face Breadth (C2), and Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence (C3). The targets' photographs were rated by 210 women and 177 men on scales for masculinity, attractiveness, and nine psychological characteristics (selected Cattell's factors): Warmth, Reasoning, Emotional Stability, Dominance, Liveliness, Rule-Consciousness, Social Boldness, Abstractedness, and Privateness. We found that masculinity correlated positively with ratings of Dominance and Social Boldness and that masculinity rated by men correlated positively with ratings of Emotional Stability and Privateness. We found no relationship between masculinity rated by women and the PCA components, while masculinity rated by men correlated negatively with C2 (possibly related to babyface features) and positively with C3 (which included features developed under the control of testosterone, such as jaw prominence). Our results imply sex differences in masculinity ratings. In particular, men used Cheekbones-Jaw Prominence and Inner Face Breadth as cues for masculinity judgments; on the other hand, women apparently perceive masculinity in a more holistic way.
- 650 _2
- $a antropometrie $7 D000886
- 650 _2
- $a krása $7 D001504
- 650 _2
- $a obličej $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005145
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mužskost $7 D057228
- 650 _2
- $a osobnost $7 D010551
- 650 _2
- $a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Rubešová, Anna, $d 1981- $7 _AN055439 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lindová, Jitka, $d 1976- $7 _AN043183 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Havlíček, Jan, $d 1974- $7 mzk2004228328 $u Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000562 $t Archives of sexual behavior $x 1573-2800 $g Roč. 40, č. 6 (2011), s. 1137-1143
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21901645 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151013143942 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944030 $s 779414
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 40 $c 6 $d 1137-1143 $i 1573-2800 $m Archives of sexual behavior $n Arch Sex Behav $x MED00000562
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01