-
Something wrong with this record ?
Intrathecal midazolam as supplementary analgesia for chronic lumbar pain--15 years' experience
J. Prochazka, A. Hejcl, L. Prochazkova,
Language English Country United States
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article
NLK
Freely Accessible Journals
from 2000 to 2021
Open Access Digital Library
from 2000-03-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-03-01 to 2015-12-31
Wiley Online Library (archiv)
from 2000-01-01 to 2012-12-31
- MeSH
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Chronic Pain drug therapy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome drug therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Low Back Pain drug therapy MeSH
- Midazolam administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Injections, Spinal methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal midazolam is based on its affecting spinal gamma-amino butyric acid receptors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and failed back surgery syndrome after a single-shot intrathecal administration of midazolam. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect was determined using a patient questionnaire during subsequent visits to the pain therapy service. We classified at least a 50% pain reduction with improved quality of life and improved functional condition as a positive outcome. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 500 administrations: 227 administrations in 57 male patients and 273 administrations in 69 female patients. We performed 81 administrations for chronic low back pain and 419 administrations for failed back surgery syndrome. The average age of our patients was 50 years (range 28 to 86). The dose administered ranged from 2 to 5 mg of midazolam. The analgesic effect lasted 9.7 weeks on average, ranging from 1 week to 3 years; the most common reported duration was between 4 and 12 weeks (3 months). In 65% of patients, we achieved pain relief lasting 4 weeks or longer; in 13%, the administration provided no analgesic effect at all. The incidence of side effects (drowsiness, nausea, headache, or transient worsening of complaints) was rather low. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal midazolam is a useful supplement to standard analgesic therapy with opioids, non-opioids, or spinal steroids.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024364
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121210103649.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01218.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21914117
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Prochazka, Jan $u Central ICU and Neurosurgical Pain Relief Service, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. jan.prochazka@mnul.cz
- 245 10
- $a Intrathecal midazolam as supplementary analgesia for chronic lumbar pain--15 years' experience / $c J. Prochazka, A. Hejcl, L. Prochazkova,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal midazolam is based on its affecting spinal gamma-amino butyric acid receptors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and failed back surgery syndrome after a single-shot intrathecal administration of midazolam. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect was determined using a patient questionnaire during subsequent visits to the pain therapy service. We classified at least a 50% pain reduction with improved quality of life and improved functional condition as a positive outcome. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 500 administrations: 227 administrations in 57 male patients and 273 administrations in 69 female patients. We performed 81 administrations for chronic low back pain and 419 administrations for failed back surgery syndrome. The average age of our patients was 50 years (range 28 to 86). The dose administered ranged from 2 to 5 mg of midazolam. The analgesic effect lasted 9.7 weeks on average, ranging from 1 week to 3 years; the most common reported duration was between 4 and 12 weeks (3 months). In 65% of patients, we achieved pain relief lasting 4 weeks or longer; in 13%, the administration provided no analgesic effect at all. The incidence of side effects (drowsiness, nausea, headache, or transient worsening of complaints) was rather low. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal midazolam is a useful supplement to standard analgesic therapy with opioids, non-opioids, or spinal steroids.
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvancia anestetická $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000759
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a chronická bolest $x farmakoterapie $7 D059350
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a failed back surgery syndrom $x farmakoterapie $7 D055111
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a spinální injekce $x metody $7 D007278
- 650 _2
- $a lumbalgie $x farmakoterapie $7 D017116
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a midazolam $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008874
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hejcl, Ales
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazkova, Lidmila
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007326 $t Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) $x 1526-4637 $g Roč. 12, č. 9 (2011), s. 1309-15
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21914117 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121210103725 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946512 $s 781692
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 12 $c 9 $d 1309-15 $i 1526-4637 $m Pain medicine $n Pain Med $x MED00007326
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02