• Something wrong with this record ?

Intrathecal midazolam as supplementary analgesia for chronic lumbar pain--15 years' experience

J. Prochazka, A. Hejcl, L. Prochazkova,

. 2011 ; 12 (9) : 1309-15.

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article

BACKGROUND: The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal midazolam is based on its affecting spinal gamma-amino butyric acid receptors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and failed back surgery syndrome after a single-shot intrathecal administration of midazolam. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect was determined using a patient questionnaire during subsequent visits to the pain therapy service. We classified at least a 50% pain reduction with improved quality of life and improved functional condition as a positive outcome. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 500 administrations: 227 administrations in 57 male patients and 273 administrations in 69 female patients. We performed 81 administrations for chronic low back pain and 419 administrations for failed back surgery syndrome. The average age of our patients was 50 years (range 28 to 86). The dose administered ranged from 2 to 5 mg of midazolam. The analgesic effect lasted 9.7 weeks on average, ranging from 1 week to 3 years; the most common reported duration was between 4 and 12 weeks (3 months). In 65% of patients, we achieved pain relief lasting 4 weeks or longer; in 13%, the administration provided no analgesic effect at all. The incidence of side effects (drowsiness, nausea, headache, or transient worsening of complaints) was rather low. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal midazolam is a useful supplement to standard analgesic therapy with opioids, non-opioids, or spinal steroids.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024364
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121210103649.0
007      
ta
008      
120815s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01218.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21914117
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Prochazka, Jan $u Central ICU and Neurosurgical Pain Relief Service, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. jan.prochazka@mnul.cz
245    10
$a Intrathecal midazolam as supplementary analgesia for chronic lumbar pain--15 years' experience / $c J. Prochazka, A. Hejcl, L. Prochazkova,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The antinociceptive effect of intrathecal midazolam is based on its affecting spinal gamma-amino butyric acid receptors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and failed back surgery syndrome after a single-shot intrathecal administration of midazolam. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect was determined using a patient questionnaire during subsequent visits to the pain therapy service. We classified at least a 50% pain reduction with improved quality of life and improved functional condition as a positive outcome. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2010, we performed 500 administrations: 227 administrations in 57 male patients and 273 administrations in 69 female patients. We performed 81 administrations for chronic low back pain and 419 administrations for failed back surgery syndrome. The average age of our patients was 50 years (range 28 to 86). The dose administered ranged from 2 to 5 mg of midazolam. The analgesic effect lasted 9.7 weeks on average, ranging from 1 week to 3 years; the most common reported duration was between 4 and 12 weeks (3 months). In 65% of patients, we achieved pain relief lasting 4 weeks or longer; in 13%, the administration provided no analgesic effect at all. The incidence of side effects (drowsiness, nausea, headache, or transient worsening of complaints) was rather low. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal midazolam is a useful supplement to standard analgesic therapy with opioids, non-opioids, or spinal steroids.
650    _2
$a adjuvancia anestetická $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000759
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a chronická bolest $x farmakoterapie $7 D059350
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a failed back surgery syndrom $x farmakoterapie $7 D055111
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a spinální injekce $x metody $7 D007278
650    _2
$a lumbalgie $x farmakoterapie $7 D017116
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a midazolam $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008874
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hejcl, Ales
700    1_
$a Prochazkova, Lidmila
773    0_
$w MED00007326 $t Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) $x 1526-4637 $g Roč. 12, č. 9 (2011), s. 1309-15
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21914117 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121210103725 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946512 $s 781692
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 12 $c 9 $d 1309-15 $i 1526-4637 $m Pain medicine $n Pain Med $x MED00007326
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...