-
Something wrong with this record ?
Microevolution of sympatry: landscape genetics of hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and E. roumanicus in Central Europe
B. Bolfíková, P. Hulva,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
PubMed Central
from 2011 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011 to 1 year ago
ProQuest Central
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1947-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1996-01-01 to 2015-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
21863052
DOI
10.1038/hdy.2011.67
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Demography MeSH
- Phylogeography MeSH
- Genetic Variation MeSH
- Haplotypes MeSH
- Hedgehogs genetics MeSH
- Microsatellite Repeats MeSH
- DNA, Mitochondrial MeSH
- Genetics, Population MeSH
- Reproductive Isolation MeSH
- Sympatry MeSH
- Gene Flow MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
We used the mitochondrial control region and nuclear microsatellites to assess the distribution patterns, population structure, demography and landscape genetics for the hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and Erinaceus roumanicus in a transect of the mid-European zone of sympatry. E. roumanicus was less frequent and restricted to regions with lower altitudes. Demographic analyses suggested recent population growth in this species. A comparison of patterns in the spatial variability of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA indicated less sex-biased dispersal and higher levels of gene flow in E. roumanicus. No evidence of recent hybridisation or introgression was detected. We interpreted these results by comparing with phylogeographic and palaeontological studies as well as with the occurrence of hybridisation in the Russian contact zone. We propose that Central Europe was colonised by E. roumanicus by the beginning of the Neolithic period and that there was a subsequent reinforcement stage as well as the formation of a zone of sympatry after the complete reproductive isolation of both species.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024379
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207103858.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2012 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/hdy.2011.67 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21863052
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bolfíková, B $u Department of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. bolfikov@natur.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Microevolution of sympatry: landscape genetics of hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and E. roumanicus in Central Europe / $c B. Bolfíková, P. Hulva,
- 520 9_
- $a We used the mitochondrial control region and nuclear microsatellites to assess the distribution patterns, population structure, demography and landscape genetics for the hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and Erinaceus roumanicus in a transect of the mid-European zone of sympatry. E. roumanicus was less frequent and restricted to regions with lower altitudes. Demographic analyses suggested recent population growth in this species. A comparison of patterns in the spatial variability of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA indicated less sex-biased dispersal and higher levels of gene flow in E. roumanicus. No evidence of recent hybridisation or introgression was detected. We interpreted these results by comparing with phylogeographic and palaeontological studies as well as with the occurrence of hybridisation in the Russian contact zone. We propose that Central Europe was colonised by E. roumanicus by the beginning of the Neolithic period and that there was a subsequent reinforcement stage as well as the formation of a zone of sympatry after the complete reproductive isolation of both species.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a mitochondriální DNA $7 D004272
- 650 _2
- $a demografie $7 D003710
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a tok genů $7 D051456
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 _2
- $a populační genetika $7 D005828
- 650 _2
- $a haplotypy $7 D006239
- 650 _2
- $a ježkovití $x genetika $7 D006364
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeografie $7 D058974
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukční izolace $7 D060047
- 650 _2
- $a sympatrie $7 D061350
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hulva, P
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002030 $t Heredity $x 1365-2540 $g Roč. 108, č. 3 (2012), s. 248-55
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21863052 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207103932 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946527 $s 781707
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 108 $c 3 $d 248-55 $i 1365-2540 $m Heredity $n Heredity $x MED00002030
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02