• Something wrong with this record ?

Role of optimization criterion in static asymmetric analysis of lumbar spine load

M. Daniel,

. 2011 ; 161 (19-20) : 477-85. [pub] 20110729

Language English Country Austria

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

A common method for load estimation in biomechanics is the inverse dynamics optimization, where the muscle activation pattern is found by minimizing or maximizing the optimization criterion. It has been shown that various optimization criteria predict remarkably similar muscle activation pattern and intra-articular contact forces during leg motion. The aim of this paper is to study the effect of the choice of optimization criterion on L4/L5 loading during static asymmetric loading. Upright standing with weight in one stretched arm was taken as a representative position. Musculoskeletal model of lumbar spine model was created from CT images of Visible Human Project. Several criteria were tested based on the minimization of muscle forces, muscle stresses, and spinal load. All criteria provide the same level of lumbar spine loading (difference is below 25%), except the criterion of minimum lumbar shear force which predicts unrealistically high spinal load and should not be considered further. Estimated spinal load and predicted muscle force activation pattern are in accordance with the intradiscal pressure measurements and EMG measurements. The L4/L5 spine loads 1312 N, 1674 N, and 1993 N were predicted for mass of weight in hand 2, 5, and 8 kg, respectively using criterion of mininum muscle stress cubed. As the optimization criteria do not considerably affect the spinal load, their choice is not critical in further clinical or ergonomic studies and computationally simpler criterion can be used.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024405
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121024124733.0
007      
ta
008      
120815e20110729au f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10354-011-0904-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21792528
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a au
100    1_
$a Daniel, Matej $u Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická. Matej.Daniel@fs.cvut.cz
245    10
$a Role of optimization criterion in static asymmetric analysis of lumbar spine load / $c M. Daniel,
520    9_
$a A common method for load estimation in biomechanics is the inverse dynamics optimization, where the muscle activation pattern is found by minimizing or maximizing the optimization criterion. It has been shown that various optimization criteria predict remarkably similar muscle activation pattern and intra-articular contact forces during leg motion. The aim of this paper is to study the effect of the choice of optimization criterion on L4/L5 loading during static asymmetric loading. Upright standing with weight in one stretched arm was taken as a representative position. Musculoskeletal model of lumbar spine model was created from CT images of Visible Human Project. Several criteria were tested based on the minimization of muscle forces, muscle stresses, and spinal load. All criteria provide the same level of lumbar spine loading (difference is below 25%), except the criterion of minimum lumbar shear force which predicts unrealistically high spinal load and should not be considered further. Estimated spinal load and predicted muscle force activation pattern are in accordance with the intradiscal pressure measurements and EMG measurements. The L4/L5 spine loads 1312 N, 1674 N, and 1993 N were predicted for mass of weight in hand 2, 5, and 8 kg, respectively using criterion of mininum muscle stress cubed. As the optimization criteria do not considerably affect the spinal load, their choice is not critical in further clinical or ergonomic studies and computationally simpler criterion can be used.
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a elektromyografie $7 D004576
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a interpretace obrazu počítačem $7 D007090
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
650    _2
$a meziobratlová ploténka $x patofyziologie $7 D007403
650    _2
$a isometrická kontrakce $x fyziologie $7 D007537
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $x patofyziologie $7 D008159
650    _2
$a anatomické modely $7 D008953
650    _2
$a teoretické modely $7 D008962
650    _2
$a posturální rovnováha $7 D004856
650    _2
$a postura těla $x fyziologie $7 D011187
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $x fyziologie $7 D016474
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
773    0_
$w MED00010763 $t Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) $x 1563-258X $g Roč. 161, č. 19-20 (20110729), s. 477-85
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21792528 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121024124937 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946553 $s 781733
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 161 $c 19-20 $d 477-85 $e 20110729 $i 1563-258X $m Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) $n Wien Med Wochenschr $x MED00010763
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...