-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Adverse drug reaction reporting in the Czech Republic 2005-2009
E. Kopečná, V. Deščíková, J. Vlček, J. Mladá,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2011-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2011-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2011-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- databáze faktografické normy trendy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nežádoucí účinky léčiv diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- systémy pro sběr zpráv o nežádoucích účincích léků normy trendy MeSH
- zdravotnický personál normy trendy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the situation regarding spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in the Czech Republic during a 5-year period (2005-2009). SETTING: Descriptive study was conducted using the data from the Czech State Institute for Drug Control pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: The data referring to all spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports received, by the pharmacovigilance department of the Czech State Institute for Drug Control during 2005-2009 were collected, analysed and compared with data from the Slovak Republic, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of received spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports by year per 10,000 inhabitants, the seriousness and outcome of reactions, the reporting groups, and the top ten molecules which contributed to the highest number of reports. RESULTS: During the study period 2005-2009, the pharmacovigilance department of the State Institute for Drug Control received 7,708 spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports of which 73.6% were serious and 2.1% resulted in death. The number of spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports per 10,000 inhabitants ranged from 1.3 to 1.7, which was lower when compared with the number of reports from three other EU countries. The healthcare professionals contributed to 64.2% of the adverse drug reactions reports, whilst marketing authorization holders provided 35.5%, and finally patients with 0.3%. Vaccines, ketoprofen, amoxicillin, statins, and estradiol were amongst the top ten molecules that gave the highest number of spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment of adverse drug reactions spontaneous reports received by the Czech Institute for Drug Control during 2005-2009 showed that the reporting rate is relatively low and remains constant over the 5 year period. More emphasis on academic/professional training is needed to educate all potential reporters on the mechanism of reporting of adverse drug reactions and to also emphasize the importance of the whole pharmacovigilance process.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024428
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240104143954.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2011 ne f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s11096-011-9527-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21678040
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kopečná, Eva $u Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, Hradec Králové 500 05, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Adverse drug reaction reporting in the Czech Republic 2005-2009 / $c E. Kopečná, V. Deščíková, J. Vlček, J. Mladá,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the situation regarding spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in the Czech Republic during a 5-year period (2005-2009). SETTING: Descriptive study was conducted using the data from the Czech State Institute for Drug Control pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: The data referring to all spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports received, by the pharmacovigilance department of the Czech State Institute for Drug Control during 2005-2009 were collected, analysed and compared with data from the Slovak Republic, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of received spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports by year per 10,000 inhabitants, the seriousness and outcome of reactions, the reporting groups, and the top ten molecules which contributed to the highest number of reports. RESULTS: During the study period 2005-2009, the pharmacovigilance department of the State Institute for Drug Control received 7,708 spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports of which 73.6% were serious and 2.1% resulted in death. The number of spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports per 10,000 inhabitants ranged from 1.3 to 1.7, which was lower when compared with the number of reports from three other EU countries. The healthcare professionals contributed to 64.2% of the adverse drug reactions reports, whilst marketing authorization holders provided 35.5%, and finally patients with 0.3%. Vaccines, ketoprofen, amoxicillin, statins, and estradiol were amongst the top ten molecules that gave the highest number of spontaneous adverse drug reactions reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment of adverse drug reactions spontaneous reports received by the Czech Institute for Drug Control during 2005-2009 showed that the reporting rate is relatively low and remains constant over the 5 year period. More emphasis on academic/professional training is needed to educate all potential reporters on the mechanism of reporting of adverse drug reactions and to also emphasize the importance of the whole pharmacovigilance process.
- 650 _2
- $a systémy pro sběr zpráv o nežádoucích účincích léků $x normy $x trendy $7 D016907
- 650 _2
- $a databáze faktografické $x normy $x trendy $7 D016208
- 650 _2
- $a nežádoucí účinky léčiv $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D064420
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotnický personál $x normy $x trendy $7 D006282
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Deščíková, Veronika $7 xx0312300
- 700 1_
- $a Vlček, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Mladá, Jana
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180241 $t International journal of clinical pharmacy $x 2210-7711 $g Roč. 33, č. 4 (2011), s. 683-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21678040 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240104143949 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946576 $s 781756
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 33 $c 4 $d 683-9 $e 20110616 $i 2210-7711 $m International journal of clinical pharmacy $n Int J Clin Pharm $x MED00180241
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02