• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

When to go with the crowd: modelling synchronization of all-or-nothing activity transitions in grouped animals

I. Dostálková, M. Špinka

. 2010 ; 263 (4) : 437-448. [pub] 20100111

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12025309

For groups of animals to keep together, the group members have to perform switches between staying in one place and moving to another place in synchrony. However, synchronization imposes a cost on individual animals, because they have to switch from one to the other behaviour at a communal time rather than at their ideal times. Here we model this situation analytically for groups in which the ideal times vary quasinormally and grouping benefit increases linearly with group size. Across the parameter space consisting of variation in the grouping benefit/cost ratio and variation in how costly it is to act too early and too late, the most common optimal solutions are full synchronization with the group staying together and zero synchronization with immediate dissolution of the group, if the group is too small for the given benefit/cost ratio. Partial synchronization, with animals at the tails of the distribution switching individually and the central core of the group in synchrony, occurs only at a narrow stripe of the space. Synchronization cost never causes splitting of the group into two as either zero, partial or full synchronization is always more advantageous. Stable solutions dictate lower degree of synchrony and lower net benefits than optimal solutions for a large range of the parameter values. If groups undergo repeated synchronization challenges, they stay together or quickly dissolve, unless the animals assort themselves into a smaller group with less variation in the ideal times. We conclude with arguing that synchronization cost is different from other types of grouping costs since it does not increase much with increasing group size. As a result, larger groups may be more stable than smaller groups. This results in the paradoxical prediction that when the grouping benefit/grouping cost ratio increases, the average group sizes might decrease, since smaller groups will be able to withstand synchronization challenges.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12025309
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130204144313.0
007      
ta
008      
120816e20100111enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.12.031 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)20060840
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Dostálková, Iva, $d 1956- $7 mzk2010582555 $u Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branisovská 31, 370 05 Ceské Budejovice, Czechia. dost@prf.jcu.cz
245    10
$a When to go with the crowd: modelling synchronization of all-or-nothing activity transitions in grouped animals / $c I. Dostálková, M. Špinka
520    9_
$a For groups of animals to keep together, the group members have to perform switches between staying in one place and moving to another place in synchrony. However, synchronization imposes a cost on individual animals, because they have to switch from one to the other behaviour at a communal time rather than at their ideal times. Here we model this situation analytically for groups in which the ideal times vary quasinormally and grouping benefit increases linearly with group size. Across the parameter space consisting of variation in the grouping benefit/cost ratio and variation in how costly it is to act too early and too late, the most common optimal solutions are full synchronization with the group staying together and zero synchronization with immediate dissolution of the group, if the group is too small for the given benefit/cost ratio. Partial synchronization, with animals at the tails of the distribution switching individually and the central core of the group in synchrony, occurs only at a narrow stripe of the space. Synchronization cost never causes splitting of the group into two as either zero, partial or full synchronization is always more advantageous. Stable solutions dictate lower degree of synchrony and lower net benefits than optimal solutions for a large range of the parameter values. If groups undergo repeated synchronization challenges, they stay together or quickly dissolve, unless the animals assort themselves into a smaller group with less variation in the ideal times. We conclude with arguing that synchronization cost is different from other types of grouping costs since it does not increase much with increasing group size. As a result, larger groups may be more stable than smaller groups. This results in the paradoxical prediction that when the grouping benefit/grouping cost ratio increases, the average group sizes might decrease, since smaller groups will be able to withstand synchronization challenges.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $7 D001522
650    _2
$a teorie her $7 D005716
650    _2
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    _2
$a teoretické modely $7 D008962
650    _2
$a predátorské chování $7 D011235
650    _2
$a sociální chování $7 D012919
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Špinka, Marek, $d 1957- $7 xx0049135
773    0_
$w MED00003018 $t Journal of theoretical biology $x 1095-8541 $g Roč. 263, č. 4 (20100111), s. 437-448
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20060840 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120816 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130204144445 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 947351 $s 782655
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 263 $c 4 $d 437-448 $e 20100111 $i 1095-8541 $m Journal of theoretical biology $n J Theor Biol $x MED00003018
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120816/10/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...