-
Something wrong with this record ?
Contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis in the South Moravian region, Czech Republic
M. Necas, E. Dastychová,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NR9203
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
SAGE Publications Journals
from 1999-01-01 to 2015-12-31
SAGE Publications Journals
from 1999-01-01 to 2015-12-31
- MeSH
- Balsams adverse effects MeSH
- Leg MeSH
- Eczema diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Dermatitis, Contact diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patch Tests MeSH
- Nickel adverse effects MeSH
- Perfume adverse effects MeSH
- Propolis adverse effects MeSH
- Resins, Plant adverse effects MeSH
- Wool adverse effects MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis. METHODS: Between the years 2001 and 2007, the authors investigated 462 patients (mean age 49.1 years, 196 men and 266 women) with the eczema/dermatitis localized on their lower extremities, including feet. The patients were investigated with epicutaneous tests of the European Standard Series and also with other special patch tests. RESULTS: The most frequent allergens were balsam of Peru, 44/462 (9.5%); wool alcohols, 41/462 (8.9%); nickel sulphate, 39/462 (8.4%); propolis, 35/462 (7.6%); fragrance mix, 34 (7.4%) and colophony, 29/462 (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lower extremity dermatitis the frequency of contact sensitization is still high, and therefore investigation with epicutaneous tests should belong to the routine dermatological diagnostic procedure in these patients.
1st Department of Dermatovenereology St Anna Faculty Hospital Pekarská 53 Brno 656 91 Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025710
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140314095650.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2010 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1258/phleb.2009.009024 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20483862
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Necas, M $u Ist Department of Dermatovenereology, St Anna Faculty Hospital, Pekarská 53, Brno 656 91, Czech Republic. miroslav.necas@fnusa.cz
- 245 10
- $a Contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis in the South Moravian region, Czech Republic / $c M. Necas, E. Dastychová,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis. METHODS: Between the years 2001 and 2007, the authors investigated 462 patients (mean age 49.1 years, 196 men and 266 women) with the eczema/dermatitis localized on their lower extremities, including feet. The patients were investigated with epicutaneous tests of the European Standard Series and also with other special patch tests. RESULTS: The most frequent allergens were balsam of Peru, 44/462 (9.5%); wool alcohols, 41/462 (8.9%); nickel sulphate, 39/462 (8.4%); propolis, 35/462 (7.6%); fragrance mix, 34 (7.4%) and colophony, 29/462 (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with lower extremity dermatitis the frequency of contact sensitization is still high, and therefore investigation with epicutaneous tests should belong to the routine dermatological diagnostic procedure in these patients.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a balzámy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001453
- 650 _2
- $a kontaktní dermatitida $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D003877
- 650 _2
- $a ekzém $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D004485
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a bérec $7 D007866
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nikl $x škodlivé účinky $7 D009532
- 650 _2
- $a náplasťové testy $7 D010328
- 650 _2
- $a parfém $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010476
- 650 _2
- $a propolis $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011429
- 650 _2
- $a rostlinné pryskyřice $x škodlivé účinky $7 D012116
- 650 _2
- $a vlna $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014935
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Dastychová, E
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003815 $t Phlebology / Venous Forum of the Royal Society of Medicine $x 1758-1125 $g Roč. 25, č. 3 (2010), s. 132-137
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20483862 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140314095659 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947752 $s 783056
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 25 $c 3 $d 132-137 $i 1758-1125 $m Phlebology $n Phlebology $x MED00003815
- GRA __
- $a NR9203 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03
