-
Something wrong with this record ?
Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity
D. Frynta, S. Lisková, S. Bültmann, H. Burda,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Breeding MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Beauty MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Endangered Species MeSH
- Parrots physiology MeSH
- Population Dynamics MeSH
- Animals, Zoo physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Parrots are one of the most frequently kept and bred bird orders in captivity. This increases poaching and thus the potential importance of captive populations for rescue programmes managed by zoos and related institutions. Both captive breeding and poaching are selective and may be influenced by the attractiveness of particular species to humans. In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that the size of zoo populations is not only determined by conservation needs, but also by the perceived beauty of individual parrot species assessed by human observers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For the purpose of data collection, we defined four sets of species (40 parrots, 367 parrots, 34 amazons, 17 macaws). Then, we asked 776 human respondents to evaluate parrot pictures of the selected species according to perceived beauty and we analyzed its association with color and morphological characters. Irrespective of the species set, we found a good agreement among the respondents. The preferred species tended to be large, colorful, and long-tailed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We repeatedly confirmed significant, positive association between the perceived beauty and the size of worldwide zoo population. Moreover, the range size and body size appeared to be significant predictors of zoo population size. In contrast, the effects of other explanatory variables, including the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) listing, appeared insignificant. Our results may suggest that zoos preferentially keep beautiful parrots and pay less attention to conservation needs.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026813
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160304141625.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0012568 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20830206
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Frynta, Daniel, $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. frynta@centrum.cz $d 1963- $7 xx0117356
- 245 10
- $a Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity / $c D. Frynta, S. Lisková, S. Bültmann, H. Burda,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Parrots are one of the most frequently kept and bred bird orders in captivity. This increases poaching and thus the potential importance of captive populations for rescue programmes managed by zoos and related institutions. Both captive breeding and poaching are selective and may be influenced by the attractiveness of particular species to humans. In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that the size of zoo populations is not only determined by conservation needs, but also by the perceived beauty of individual parrot species assessed by human observers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For the purpose of data collection, we defined four sets of species (40 parrots, 367 parrots, 34 amazons, 17 macaws). Then, we asked 776 human respondents to evaluate parrot pictures of the selected species according to perceived beauty and we analyzed its association with color and morphological characters. Irrespective of the species set, we found a good agreement among the respondents. The preferred species tended to be large, colorful, and long-tailed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We repeatedly confirmed significant, positive association between the perceived beauty and the size of worldwide zoo population. Moreover, the range size and body size appeared to be significant predictors of zoo population size. In contrast, the effects of other explanatory variables, including the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) listing, appeared insignificant. Our results may suggest that zoos preferentially keep beautiful parrots and pay less attention to conservation needs.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata v ZOO $x fyziologie $7 D000836
- 650 _2
- $a krása $7 D001504
- 650 _2
- $a chov $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a ohrožené druhy $7 D056727
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a papouškovití $x fyziologie $7 D010311
- 650 _2
- $a populační dynamika $7 D011157
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Lisková, Silvie
- 700 1_
- $a Bültmann, Sebastian
- 700 1_
- $a Burda, Hynek, $d 1952- $7 jk01020277
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PLoS ONE $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 5, č. 9 (2010), s. e12568
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20830206 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160304141637 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948855 $s 784159
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 5 $c 9 $d e12568 $e 20100907 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $b NLK113 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/01