-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Determining the extent and stage of disease in patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using 18F-FDG-PET/CT
T. Papajik, M. Myslivecek, M. Skopalova, A. Malan, E. Buriankova, V. Koza, M. Hnatkova, M. Trneny, Z. Sedova, Z. Kubova, P. Koranda, P. Flodr, J. Jarkovsky, L. Dusek, K. Indrak
Jazyk angličtina Země Slovensko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Odkazy
PubMed
21524147
DOI
10.4149/neo_2011_04_291
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 diagnostické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nehodgkinský lymfom patologie MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- pozitronová emisní tomografie MeSH
- radiofarmaka diagnostické užití MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- staging nádorů metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) combined with computed tomography (CT) represents a three-dimensional imaging method suitable for staging in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). The aim of our prospective multicenter study was to assess the value of initial PET/CT as compared with CT and PET alone for determining the stage and extent of the disease. A total of 122 patients with newly diagnosed NHL were examined using PET/CT. Four patients with resected lymphoma lesion and negative PET/CT were therefore excluded from the study. Of the remaining 118 cases, a total of 117 (99%) were described as 18F-FDG-avid. When compared with PET/CT, CT and PET showed very good sensitivity of lymph node imaging (97% and 100%, respectively); the specificity, however, was significantly lower (66.7% and 94.4%, respectively; p=0.0001). When detecting organ lesions, the sensitivity of CT and PET was lower than that of PET/CT (92.5% and 96.3%, respectively; p=0.0001); specificity was significantly decreased in CT and a little lower in PET (59.5% and 91.9%; p=0.0001). When compared with CT alone, PET/CT changed staging of the disease in 11 patients (9%) and was able to detect a total of 82 discrepancies in 67 of the 117 patients (57%). In conclusion, PET/CT is a new standard in imaging the involvement of lymph nodes and extranodal organs in NHL patients regardless of their histopathological types. Both sensitivity and specificity of the examination are higher than those of CT as well as PET alone.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027582
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140730120018.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 xo f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4149/neo_2011_04_291 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21524147
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xo
- 100 1_
- $a Papajík, Tomáš, $d 1967- $7 xx0060566 $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University I.P.Pavlova Olomouc, Czech Republic. tomas.papajik@fnol.cz
- 245 10
- $a Determining the extent and stage of disease in patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using 18F-FDG-PET/CT / $c T. Papajik, M. Myslivecek, M. Skopalova, A. Malan, E. Buriankova, V. Koza, M. Hnatkova, M. Trneny, Z. Sedova, Z. Kubova, P. Koranda, P. Flodr, J. Jarkovsky, L. Dusek, K. Indrak
- 520 9_
- $a Positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) combined with computed tomography (CT) represents a three-dimensional imaging method suitable for staging in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). The aim of our prospective multicenter study was to assess the value of initial PET/CT as compared with CT and PET alone for determining the stage and extent of the disease. A total of 122 patients with newly diagnosed NHL were examined using PET/CT. Four patients with resected lymphoma lesion and negative PET/CT were therefore excluded from the study. Of the remaining 118 cases, a total of 117 (99%) were described as 18F-FDG-avid. When compared with PET/CT, CT and PET showed very good sensitivity of lymph node imaging (97% and 100%, respectively); the specificity, however, was significantly lower (66.7% and 94.4%, respectively; p=0.0001). When detecting organ lesions, the sensitivity of CT and PET was lower than that of PET/CT (92.5% and 96.3%, respectively; p=0.0001); specificity was significantly decreased in CT and a little lower in PET (59.5% and 91.9%; p=0.0001). When compared with CT alone, PET/CT changed staging of the disease in 11 patients (9%) and was able to detect a total of 82 discrepancies in 67 of the 117 patients (57%). In conclusion, PET/CT is a new standard in imaging the involvement of lymph nodes and extranodal organs in NHL patients regardless of their histopathological types. Both sensitivity and specificity of the examination are higher than those of CT as well as PET alone.
- 650 _2
- $a fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 $x diagnostické užití $7 D019788
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a nehodgkinský lymfom $x patologie $x radioizotopová diagnostika $7 D008228
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $x metody $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a radiofarmaka $x diagnostické užití $7 D019275
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mysliveček, Miroslav, $d 1946- $7 jn20000401824
- 700 1_
- $a Skopalova, M
- 700 1_
- $a Malan, A
- 700 1_
- $a Buriankova, E
- 700 1_
- $a Koza, V
- 700 1_
- $a Hnatkova, M
- 700 1_
- $a Trněný, Marek, $d 1960- $7 nlk20000083659
- 700 1#
- $a Šedová, Zuzana. $7 xx0216491
- 700 1#
- $a Kubová, Zuzana. $7 xx0199107
- 700 1_
- $a Koranda, Pavel, $d 1957- $7 ola2003193656
- 700 1_
- $a Flodr, Patrik, $d 1975- $7 nlk20030127444
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovský, Jiří $7 stk2008461294
- 700 1_
- $a Dušek, Ladislav, $d 1967- $7 mzk2003181727
- 700 1_
- $a Indrák, Karel, $d 1947- $7 jn20000401162
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003470 $t Neoplasma $x 0028-2685 $g Roč. 58, č. 4 (2011), s. 291-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21524147 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1194 $c 659 $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140730120336 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949624 $s 784928
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 58 $c 4 $d 291-7 $i 0028-2685 $m Neoplasma $n Neoplasma $x MED00003470
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03