• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Biochemical and pharmacological effects of mitoxantrone and acetyl-L-carnitine in mice with a solid form of Ehrlich tumour

M. Niang, T. Soukup, P. Zivný, P. Tomšík, J. Bukač, M. Rezáčová, A. Stoklasová, J. Cerman, L. Sišpera,

. 2011 ; 57 (1) : 35-42. [pub] 20110104

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12027888
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1998-01-01 do 2015-11-30
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1998-01-01 do 2015-11-30

BACKGROUND: Dysfunction of the carnitine system in non-tumour tissue following anticancer therapy has been reported. In this setting, supplementation with carnitine derivatives might increase the general metabolic activity of normal cells so that they might better withstand the adverse effects of chemotherapy aimed at tumour cells. Here we investigated the effect of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) alone and in combination with the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone (MX) in an animal cancer model. METHODS: The effects of MX and MX-ALC were assessed based on gain or loss of body weight and on local growth of a solid form of Ehrlich tumour inoculated into mice. We also performed biochemical analyses like serum activities of some enzymes signalling the functioning of the liver, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Total protein, albumin and bilirubin were also determined in serum. Under favourable conditions, the Ehrlich tumour readily forms metastases, and this is the reason why we performed histological studies of samples of both the liver and heart in order to identify changes that may have mediated the observed effect of the treatment. In addition to those studies, the survival time of treated animals against controls was also noted. RESULTS: MX monotherapy was associated with lower body weight gain, fewer metastases, smaller tumour size, and lower dissemination. ALC alone promoted survival, but had no potentiating effect on MX therapy in terms of survival. Serum biochemistry changes associated with MX-ALC treatment consisted of a significant (p < 0.05) increase in AST with MX at 6 or 9 mg·kg(-1) plus ALC 200 mg·kg(-1) and a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in total protein compared to the corresponding MX group; serum albumin and bilirubin remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: ALC in combination with MX, regardless of the dose of MX, led to higher occurrences of metastases with dissemination to the kidneys, lungs, heart, and mediastinum compared to MX treatment alone. These histological findings indicate that ALC is inappropriate to combine with MX in the treatment of a solid cancer. The protective effect of ALC in combination therapy with the cytostatic drug MX was not supported in this study by our findings that the agent did not improve the therapeutic outcomes of MX therapy.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12027888
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180323081919.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 sz f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1159/000321296 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21212670
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Niang, Mohamed, $d 1955-2016 $7 xx0076298 $u Department of Medical Biochemistry, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. niang@lfhk.cuni.cz
245    10
$a Biochemical and pharmacological effects of mitoxantrone and acetyl-L-carnitine in mice with a solid form of Ehrlich tumour / $c M. Niang, T. Soukup, P. Zivný, P. Tomšík, J. Bukač, M. Rezáčová, A. Stoklasová, J. Cerman, L. Sišpera,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Dysfunction of the carnitine system in non-tumour tissue following anticancer therapy has been reported. In this setting, supplementation with carnitine derivatives might increase the general metabolic activity of normal cells so that they might better withstand the adverse effects of chemotherapy aimed at tumour cells. Here we investigated the effect of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) alone and in combination with the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone (MX) in an animal cancer model. METHODS: The effects of MX and MX-ALC were assessed based on gain or loss of body weight and on local growth of a solid form of Ehrlich tumour inoculated into mice. We also performed biochemical analyses like serum activities of some enzymes signalling the functioning of the liver, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Total protein, albumin and bilirubin were also determined in serum. Under favourable conditions, the Ehrlich tumour readily forms metastases, and this is the reason why we performed histological studies of samples of both the liver and heart in order to identify changes that may have mediated the observed effect of the treatment. In addition to those studies, the survival time of treated animals against controls was also noted. RESULTS: MX monotherapy was associated with lower body weight gain, fewer metastases, smaller tumour size, and lower dissemination. ALC alone promoted survival, but had no potentiating effect on MX therapy in terms of survival. Serum biochemistry changes associated with MX-ALC treatment consisted of a significant (p < 0.05) increase in AST with MX at 6 or 9 mg·kg(-1) plus ALC 200 mg·kg(-1) and a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in total protein compared to the corresponding MX group; serum albumin and bilirubin remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: ALC in combination with MX, regardless of the dose of MX, led to higher occurrences of metastases with dissemination to the kidneys, lungs, heart, and mediastinum compared to MX treatment alone. These histological findings indicate that ALC is inappropriate to combine with MX in the treatment of a solid cancer. The protective effect of ALC in combination therapy with the cytostatic drug MX was not supported in this study by our findings that the agent did not improve the therapeutic outcomes of MX therapy.
650    _2
$a acylkarnitin $x terapeutické užití $7 D000108
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a antitumorózní látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
650    _2
$a bilirubin $x krev $7 D001663
650    _2
$a tělesná hmotnost $7 D001835
650    _2
$a Ehrlichův tumor $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D002286
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a experimentální nádory jater $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D008114
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a mitoxantron $x terapeutické užití $7 D008942
650    _2
$a sérový albumin $x analýza $7 D012709
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Soukup, T
700    1_
$a Zivný, P
700    1_
$a Tomšík, P
700    1_
$a Bukač, J
700    1_
$a Rezáčová, M
700    1_
$a Stoklasová, A
700    1_
$a Cerman, J
700    1_
$a Sišpera, L
773    0_
$w MED00002125 $t Chemotherapy $x 1421-9794 $g Roč. 57, č. 1 (2011), s. 35-42
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21212670 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180323081941 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 949930 $s 785234
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 57 $c 1 $d 35-42 $e 20110104 $i 1421-9794 $m Chemotherapy $n Chemotherapy $x MED00002125
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/03

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...