• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cushions of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) do not facilitate other plants under extreme altitude and dry conditions in the north-west Himalayas

F. de Bello, J. Doležal, M. Dvorský, Z. Chlumská, K. Řeháková, J. Klimešová, L. Klimeš,

. 2011 ; 108 (3) : 567-73. [pub] 20110803

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028129
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Cushion plants are commonly considered as keystone nurse species that ameliorate the harsh conditions they inhabit in alpine ecosystems, thus facilitating other species and increasing alpine plant biodiversity. A literature search resulted in 25 key studies showing overwhelming facilitative effects of different cushion plants and hypothesizing greater facilitation with increased environmental severity (i.e. higher altitude and/or lower rainfall). At the same time, emerging ecological theory alongside the cushion-specific literature suggests that facilitation might not always occur under extreme environmental conditions, and especially under high altitude and dryness. METHODS: To assess these hypotheses, possible nursing effects of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) were examined at extremely high altitude (5900 m a.s.l.) and in dry conditions (precipitation <100 mm year(-1)) in Eastern Ladakh, Trans-Himalaya. This is, by far, the highest site, and the second driest, at which the effects of cushions have been studied so far. KEY RESULTS: In accordance with the theoretical predictions, no nursing effects of T. caespitosum on other alpine plants were detected. The number and abundance of species were greater outside cushions than within and on the edge of cushions. None of the 13 species detected was positively associated with cushions, while nine of them were negatively associated. Plant diversity increased with the size of the area sampled outside cushions, but no species-area relationship was found within cushions. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the emerging theoretical prediction of restricted facilitative effects under extreme combinations of cold and dryness, integrating these ideas in the context of the ecology of cushion plants. This evidence suggests that cases of missing strong facilitation are likely to be found in other extreme alpine conditions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028129
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121206111455.0
007      
ta
008      
120817e20110803enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcr183 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21813564
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a de Bello, Francesco $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, CZ-379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es
245    10
$a Cushions of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) do not facilitate other plants under extreme altitude and dry conditions in the north-west Himalayas / $c F. de Bello, J. Doležal, M. Dvorský, Z. Chlumská, K. Řeháková, J. Klimešová, L. Klimeš,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Cushion plants are commonly considered as keystone nurse species that ameliorate the harsh conditions they inhabit in alpine ecosystems, thus facilitating other species and increasing alpine plant biodiversity. A literature search resulted in 25 key studies showing overwhelming facilitative effects of different cushion plants and hypothesizing greater facilitation with increased environmental severity (i.e. higher altitude and/or lower rainfall). At the same time, emerging ecological theory alongside the cushion-specific literature suggests that facilitation might not always occur under extreme environmental conditions, and especially under high altitude and dryness. METHODS: To assess these hypotheses, possible nursing effects of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) were examined at extremely high altitude (5900 m a.s.l.) and in dry conditions (precipitation <100 mm year(-1)) in Eastern Ladakh, Trans-Himalaya. This is, by far, the highest site, and the second driest, at which the effects of cushions have been studied so far. KEY RESULTS: In accordance with the theoretical predictions, no nursing effects of T. caespitosum on other alpine plants were detected. The number and abundance of species were greater outside cushions than within and on the edge of cushions. None of the 13 species detected was positively associated with cushions, while nine of them were negatively associated. Plant diversity increased with the size of the area sampled outside cushions, but no species-area relationship was found within cushions. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the emerging theoretical prediction of restricted facilitative effects under extreme combinations of cold and dryness, integrating these ideas in the context of the ecology of cushion plants. This evidence suggests that cases of missing strong facilitation are likely to be found in other extreme alpine conditions.
650    _2
$a nadmořská výška $7 D000531
650    _2
$a Caryophyllaceae $7 D029748
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
650    _2
$a voda $7 D014867
651    _2
$a Asie $7 D001208
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Doležal, Jiří
700    1_
$a Dvorský, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Chlumská, Zuzana
700    1_
$a Řeháková, Klára
700    1_
$a Klimešová, Jitka
700    1_
$a Klimeš, Leoš
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 108, č. 3 (20110803), s. 567-73
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21813564 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121206111528 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950171 $s 785475
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 108 $c 3 $d 567-73 $e 20110803 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...