-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Cushions of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) do not facilitate other plants under extreme altitude and dry conditions in the north-west Himalayas
F. de Bello, J. Doležal, M. Dvorský, Z. Chlumská, K. Řeháková, J. Klimešová, L. Klimeš,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
21813564
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcr183
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Caryophyllaceae MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- fyziologický stres MeSH
- nadmořská výška MeSH
- voda MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Asie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Cushion plants are commonly considered as keystone nurse species that ameliorate the harsh conditions they inhabit in alpine ecosystems, thus facilitating other species and increasing alpine plant biodiversity. A literature search resulted in 25 key studies showing overwhelming facilitative effects of different cushion plants and hypothesizing greater facilitation with increased environmental severity (i.e. higher altitude and/or lower rainfall). At the same time, emerging ecological theory alongside the cushion-specific literature suggests that facilitation might not always occur under extreme environmental conditions, and especially under high altitude and dryness. METHODS: To assess these hypotheses, possible nursing effects of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) were examined at extremely high altitude (5900 m a.s.l.) and in dry conditions (precipitation <100 mm year(-1)) in Eastern Ladakh, Trans-Himalaya. This is, by far, the highest site, and the second driest, at which the effects of cushions have been studied so far. KEY RESULTS: In accordance with the theoretical predictions, no nursing effects of T. caespitosum on other alpine plants were detected. The number and abundance of species were greater outside cushions than within and on the edge of cushions. None of the 13 species detected was positively associated with cushions, while nine of them were negatively associated. Plant diversity increased with the size of the area sampled outside cushions, but no species-area relationship was found within cushions. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the emerging theoretical prediction of restricted facilitative effects under extreme combinations of cold and dryness, integrating these ideas in the context of the ecology of cushion plants. This evidence suggests that cases of missing strong facilitation are likely to be found in other extreme alpine conditions.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12028129
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121206111455.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20110803enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcr183 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21813564
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a de Bello, Francesco $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, CZ-379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic. fradebello@ctfc.es
- 245 10
- $a Cushions of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) do not facilitate other plants under extreme altitude and dry conditions in the north-west Himalayas / $c F. de Bello, J. Doležal, M. Dvorský, Z. Chlumská, K. Řeháková, J. Klimešová, L. Klimeš,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Cushion plants are commonly considered as keystone nurse species that ameliorate the harsh conditions they inhabit in alpine ecosystems, thus facilitating other species and increasing alpine plant biodiversity. A literature search resulted in 25 key studies showing overwhelming facilitative effects of different cushion plants and hypothesizing greater facilitation with increased environmental severity (i.e. higher altitude and/or lower rainfall). At the same time, emerging ecological theory alongside the cushion-specific literature suggests that facilitation might not always occur under extreme environmental conditions, and especially under high altitude and dryness. METHODS: To assess these hypotheses, possible nursing effects of Thylacospermum caespitosum (Caryophyllaceae) were examined at extremely high altitude (5900 m a.s.l.) and in dry conditions (precipitation <100 mm year(-1)) in Eastern Ladakh, Trans-Himalaya. This is, by far, the highest site, and the second driest, at which the effects of cushions have been studied so far. KEY RESULTS: In accordance with the theoretical predictions, no nursing effects of T. caespitosum on other alpine plants were detected. The number and abundance of species were greater outside cushions than within and on the edge of cushions. None of the 13 species detected was positively associated with cushions, while nine of them were negatively associated. Plant diversity increased with the size of the area sampled outside cushions, but no species-area relationship was found within cushions. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the emerging theoretical prediction of restricted facilitative effects under extreme combinations of cold and dryness, integrating these ideas in the context of the ecology of cushion plants. This evidence suggests that cases of missing strong facilitation are likely to be found in other extreme alpine conditions.
- 650 _2
- $a nadmořská výška $7 D000531
- 650 _2
- $a Caryophyllaceae $7 D029748
- 650 _2
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
- 650 _2
- $a voda $7 D014867
- 651 _2
- $a Asie $7 D001208
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Doležal, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Dvorský, Miroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Chlumská, Zuzana
- 700 1_
- $a Řeháková, Klára
- 700 1_
- $a Klimešová, Jitka
- 700 1_
- $a Klimeš, Leoš
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 108, č. 3 (20110803), s. 567-73
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21813564 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121206111528 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 950171 $s 785475
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 108 $c 3 $d 567-73 $e 20110803 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/04