• Something wrong with this record ?

Ist das Alter ein Risikofaktor für laparoskopische kolorektale Operationen? [Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?]

L. Martinek, J. Dostalik, I. Gunka, P. Gunkova, P. Zonca,

. 2011 ; 136 (3) : 264-8.

Language German Country Germany

Document type Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients and compare them with the results of open procedures. METHODS: An analysis of a prospectively collected database of 705 patients who underwent in the period between January 2001 and December 2006 elective laparoscopic (LAC) or open (OC) colorectal surgery was performed. The primary end point was the morbidity rate, which was analysed in relation to the age (≤ 75 years, > 75 years) and operative technique (laparoscopic, open). RESULTS: During the study period, 360 elective laparoscopic and 345 elective open colorectal operations were performed. 140 patients (20%) were older than 75 years (geriatrics), 60 of whom underwent laparoscopic and 80 open surgery. Both groups of patients (laparoscopic vs. open) were comparable in basic parameters. Mean operative time for laparoscopic colorectal resections was not longer (LAC 141 ± 46 min vs. OC 137 ± 57 min, n. s.); even in cases of simple stoma formation it was significantly shorter (LAC 42 ± 19 min vs. OC 78 ± 32 min, p = 0.004). In the group of younger patients (≤ 75 years) the open approach was associated with a statistically significant increase of postoperative morbidity (LAC 26% vs. OC 34%, p = 0.039). In the group of geriatric patients (> 75 years) the open approach was associated with a significantly high incidence of postoperative morbidity (LAC 27% vs. OC 48%, p = 0.012) too. In the laparoscopically operated patients, the morbidity rate did not differ in both age groups (older than 75 years 27% vs. younger than 75 years 26%, n. s.). Conversely, open procedures in elderly patients were associated with a significant increase of postoperative complications (morbidity) compared to younger patients (older than 75 years 48% vs. younger than 75 years 34%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: On account of the lower incidence of post-operative complications, the laparoscopic approach should be indicated in colorectal surgery for geriatric patients.

Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028457
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160209111145.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 gw f 000 0#ger||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0030-1262540 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21184387
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a ger
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Martinek, L $u Universitätskrankenhaus, Chirurgische Klinik, Ostrava, Tschechien. lubomir.martinek@post.cz
245    10
$a Ist das Alter ein Risikofaktor für laparoskopische kolorektale Operationen? / $c L. Martinek, J. Dostalik, I. Gunka, P. Gunkova, P. Zonca,
246    31
$a [Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?]
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients and compare them with the results of open procedures. METHODS: An analysis of a prospectively collected database of 705 patients who underwent in the period between January 2001 and December 2006 elective laparoscopic (LAC) or open (OC) colorectal surgery was performed. The primary end point was the morbidity rate, which was analysed in relation to the age (≤ 75 years, > 75 years) and operative technique (laparoscopic, open). RESULTS: During the study period, 360 elective laparoscopic and 345 elective open colorectal operations were performed. 140 patients (20%) were older than 75 years (geriatrics), 60 of whom underwent laparoscopic and 80 open surgery. Both groups of patients (laparoscopic vs. open) were comparable in basic parameters. Mean operative time for laparoscopic colorectal resections was not longer (LAC 141 ± 46 min vs. OC 137 ± 57 min, n. s.); even in cases of simple stoma formation it was significantly shorter (LAC 42 ± 19 min vs. OC 78 ± 32 min, p = 0.004). In the group of younger patients (≤ 75 years) the open approach was associated with a statistically significant increase of postoperative morbidity (LAC 26% vs. OC 34%, p = 0.039). In the group of geriatric patients (> 75 years) the open approach was associated with a significantly high incidence of postoperative morbidity (LAC 27% vs. OC 48%, p = 0.012) too. In the laparoscopically operated patients, the morbidity rate did not differ in both age groups (older than 75 years 27% vs. younger than 75 years 26%, n. s.). Conversely, open procedures in elderly patients were associated with a significant increase of postoperative complications (morbidity) compared to younger patients (older than 75 years 48% vs. younger than 75 years 34%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: On account of the lower incidence of post-operative complications, the laparoscopic approach should be indicated in colorectal surgery for geriatric patients.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a kolektomie $x škodlivé účinky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003082
650    _2
$a nemoci tlustého střeva $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D003108
650    _2
$a kolorektální nádory $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D015179
650    _2
$a komorbidita $7 D015897
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a ukazatele zdravotního stavu $7 D006305
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x škodlivé účinky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010535
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010043
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a nemoci rekta $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D012002
650    _2
$a rektum $x chirurgie $7 D012007
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a studie pohybu a času $7 D013996
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dostalik, J
700    1_
$a Gunka, I
700    1_
$a Gunkova, P
700    1_
$a Zonca, P
773    0_
$w MED00010838 $t Zentralblatt für Chirurgie $x 1438-9592 $g Roč. 136, č. 3 (2011), s. 264-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21184387 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160209111323 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950499 $s 785803
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 136 $c 3 $d 264-8 $i 1438-9592 $m Zentralblatt für Chirurgie $n Zent.bl. Chir $x MED00010838
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...