• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Teaching critical appraisal of articles on psychopharmacology

P. Mohr, C. Höschl, J. Volavka

. 2012 ; 36 (2) : 114-117.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12034556
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 1997-03-01 do Před 1 rokem

Odkazy

PubMed 22532200
DOI 10.1176/appi.ap.10070100
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatrists and other physicians sometimes read publications superficially, relying excessively on abstracts. The authors addressed this problem by teaching critical appraisal of individual articles. METHOD: The authors developed a 23-item appraisal instrument to assess articles in the area of psychopharmacology. The results were collected with an electronic voting system. A discussion of each of the item followed; tutors shared their views and provided key ratings. RESULTS: Six publications were evaluated in the course of three workshops by a total of 58 trainees. Evaluation of the papers yielded varying results, reflecting variations of the participants' theoretical background as well as varied quality of the publications. The authors present detailed analysis of one paper as an illustrative example. CONCLUSION: The discussion format and voting stimulated active participation of the trainees. Active involvement, facilitated by the structured assessment tool, followed by feedback with discussion, may enhance the learning process.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034556
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160818062158.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1176/appi.ap.10070100 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22532200
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mohr, Pavel, $d 1965- $7 xx0054512 $u Clinical Division, Prague Psychiatric Center, Praha, Czech Republic. mohr@pcp.lf3.cuni.cz
245    10
$a Teaching critical appraisal of articles on psychopharmacology / $c P. Mohr, C. Höschl, J. Volavka
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Psychiatrists and other physicians sometimes read publications superficially, relying excessively on abstracts. The authors addressed this problem by teaching critical appraisal of individual articles. METHOD: The authors developed a 23-item appraisal instrument to assess articles in the area of psychopharmacology. The results were collected with an electronic voting system. A discussion of each of the item followed; tutors shared their views and provided key ratings. RESULTS: Six publications were evaluated in the course of three workshops by a total of 58 trainees. Evaluation of the papers yielded varying results, reflecting variations of the participants' theoretical background as well as varied quality of the publications. The authors present detailed analysis of one paper as an illustrative example. CONCLUSION: The discussion format and voting stimulated active participation of the trainees. Active involvement, facilitated by the structured assessment tool, followed by feedback with discussion, may enhance the learning process.
650    _2
$a zpětná vazba $7 D005246
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a učení $7 D007858
650    _2
$a periodika jako téma $7 D010506
650    _2
$a psychofarmakologie $x výchova $7 D011600
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Höschl, Cyril, $d 1949- $7 jn20000401149 $u Prague Psychiatric Centre, Ustavni 91, 181 03 Praha 8, Czech Republic. mail@hoschl.cz
700    1_
$a Volavka, Jan, $d 1934- $7 nlk20030145289 $u Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962
773    0_
$w MED00008714 $t Academic psychiatry the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry $x 1545-7230 $g Roč. 36, č. 2 (2012), s. 114-117
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22532200 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160818062452 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956566 $s 792053
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 36 $c 2 $d 114-117 $i 1545-7230 $m Academic psychiatry $n Acad Psychiatry $x MED00008714
LZP    __
$b NLK122 $a Pubmed-20121023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace