-
Something wrong with this record ?
Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation
J. Kremláček, M. Hulan, M. Kuba, Z. Kubová, J. Langrová, F. Vít, J. Szanyi,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adaptation, Ocular physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pattern Recognition, Visual physiology MeSH
- Motion Perception physiology MeSH
- Evoked Potentials, Visual physiology MeSH
- Visual Cortex physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Visual evoked potentials to motion-onset stimulation (M-VEPs) gradually attenuate in amplitude during examination. The observed decline in averaged responses can be caused by decreases in single response magnitudes and/or increased variability in a response delays, that is, latency jittering. To illuminate the origins of the suppression of M-VEPs during stimuli repetition, we used correlation technique to estimate an upper bound of possible latency jittering of single sweeps and we evaluated the effect of its correction on the amplitudes of three M-VEP dominant peaks P1, N2 and P3. During prolonged visual motion stimulation, the variability of corrective latency shifts in the occipital region increased (r = 0.35: 0.44) and the number of single responses corresponding to the average curve declined in occipital and parietal derivations (r = -0.48: -0.62). While the P1 peak amplitude did not exhibit any time-specific behaviour, the N2 amplitude exhibited a significant decay of 29.4% that was partially reduced to 16.6% in the central occipital derivation by the latency jitter and non-correspondence corrections. The strongest attenuation (32.7%) was observed in the P3 amplitude and was less sensitive to the corrections, dropping only to 27.9%. The main part of the response suppression to repeated motion stimulation was caused by amplitude drop and represents non-stationary process that likely correspond to a fatigue model. The rise of variability in latency jitter correction and the reduction in single responses correlated with the M-VEP were significant factors associated with prolonged motion stimulation. The relation of these parameters to a hypothetical veridical response is ambiguous and can be caused by a time shift of the response or by a change of signal-to-noise ratio. Using selective averaging and latency jitter correction, the effect of response suppression was partially removed.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034654
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207094914.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10633-012-9321-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22431242
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kremláček, J $u Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.kremlacek@lfhk.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation / $c J. Kremláček, M. Hulan, M. Kuba, Z. Kubová, J. Langrová, F. Vít, J. Szanyi,
- 520 9_
- $a Visual evoked potentials to motion-onset stimulation (M-VEPs) gradually attenuate in amplitude during examination. The observed decline in averaged responses can be caused by decreases in single response magnitudes and/or increased variability in a response delays, that is, latency jittering. To illuminate the origins of the suppression of M-VEPs during stimuli repetition, we used correlation technique to estimate an upper bound of possible latency jittering of single sweeps and we evaluated the effect of its correction on the amplitudes of three M-VEP dominant peaks P1, N2 and P3. During prolonged visual motion stimulation, the variability of corrective latency shifts in the occipital region increased (r = 0.35: 0.44) and the number of single responses corresponding to the average curve declined in occipital and parietal derivations (r = -0.48: -0.62). While the P1 peak amplitude did not exhibit any time-specific behaviour, the N2 amplitude exhibited a significant decay of 29.4% that was partially reduced to 16.6% in the central occipital derivation by the latency jitter and non-correspondence corrections. The strongest attenuation (32.7%) was observed in the P3 amplitude and was less sensitive to the corrections, dropping only to 27.9%. The main part of the response suppression to repeated motion stimulation was caused by amplitude drop and represents non-stationary process that likely correspond to a fatigue model. The rise of variability in latency jitter correction and the reduction in single responses correlated with the M-VEP were significant factors associated with prolonged motion stimulation. The relation of these parameters to a hypothetical veridical response is ambiguous and can be caused by a time shift of the response or by a change of signal-to-noise ratio. Using selective averaging and latency jitter correction, the effect of response suppression was partially removed.
- 650 _2
- $a adaptace oční $x fyziologie $7 D000221
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové evokované potenciály $x fyziologie $7 D005074
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a vnímání pohybu $x fyziologie $7 D009039
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznávání obrazu $x fyziologie $7 D010364
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové korové centrum $x fyziologie $7 D014793
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hulan, M
- 700 1_
- $a Kuba, M
- 700 1_
- $a Kubová, Z
- 700 1_
- $a Langrová, J
- 700 1_
- $a Vít, F
- 700 1_
- $a Szanyi, J
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 124, č. 3 (2012), s. 211-23
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22431242 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207094949 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956664 $s 792151
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 124 $c 3 $d 211-23 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20121023