-
Something wrong with this record ?
Dental implants and improvement of oral health-related quality of life
Pavel Kriz, M. Seydlova, T. Dostalova, Z. Valenta, K. Chleborad, Z. Jana, J. Feberova, Radek Hippmann
Language English Country Denmark
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Marital Status MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Educational Status MeSH
- Dental Implants MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is a multifaceted field involving many factors. The aim of our study was to assess whether implant therapy improves OHRQoL in dental patients. METHODS: Patients receiving at least one implant completed a health-related questionnaire before and after the implantation (minimum 1.5 months). Questions covered the functional and aesthetic scales (AS). Paired differences in individual scores were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A univariate analysis of covariance was used to relate overall and scale-specific average paired differences to age, gender, marital and educational status. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to assess interactions between the covariates and different scales of outcome. All tests were performed at statistical significance level α = 0.05. RESULTS: All twelve Wilcoxon tests supported an improvement in OHRQoL after implant placement. On the AS, the mean difference in OHRQoL scores was found to be associated with marital status, presence of aesthetic reasons for undergoing the surgery and number of front teeth replaced by implants. On the functional scale (FS), most significant associations were observed with the number of front teeth replaced via implantation, followed by the presence of chewing problems and marital status. The multivariate analysis helped to identify the covariates that varied significantly over the two scales of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of covariates responding significantly differently on different scales should not be summarized using an overall univariate analysis, using paired score differences averaged over all items. Such effect summary would be misleading. In the present study, significant implant-related improvements in OHRQoL were observed on both the aesthetic and FS in patients with at least one implant in the front dental area.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034695
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221005115233.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 dk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00668.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22369711
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a dk
- 100 1_
- $a Kříž, Pavel, $d 1971- $7 xx0118374 $u 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Dental implants and improvement of oral health-related quality of life / $c Pavel Kriz, M. Seydlova, T. Dostalova, Z. Valenta, K. Chleborad, Z. Jana, J. Feberova, Radek Hippmann
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is a multifaceted field involving many factors. The aim of our study was to assess whether implant therapy improves OHRQoL in dental patients. METHODS: Patients receiving at least one implant completed a health-related questionnaire before and after the implantation (minimum 1.5 months). Questions covered the functional and aesthetic scales (AS). Paired differences in individual scores were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A univariate analysis of covariance was used to relate overall and scale-specific average paired differences to age, gender, marital and educational status. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to assess interactions between the covariates and different scales of outcome. All tests were performed at statistical significance level α = 0.05. RESULTS: All twelve Wilcoxon tests supported an improvement in OHRQoL after implant placement. On the AS, the mean difference in OHRQoL scores was found to be associated with marital status, presence of aesthetic reasons for undergoing the surgery and number of front teeth replaced by implants. On the functional scale (FS), most significant associations were observed with the number of front teeth replaced via implantation, followed by the presence of chewing problems and marital status. The multivariate analysis helped to identify the covariates that varied significantly over the two scales of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of covariates responding significantly differently on different scales should not be summarized using an overall univariate analysis, using paired score differences averaged over all items. Such effect summary would be misleading. In the present study, significant implant-related improvements in OHRQoL were observed on both the aesthetic and FS in patients with at least one implant in the front dental area.
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a zubní implantáty $7 D015921
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň vzdělání $7 D004522
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a manželský stav $7 D017533
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Beznosková Seydlová, Michaela, $d 1978- $7 xx0085781
- 700 1_
- $a Dostálová, Taťjana, $d 1955- $7 mzk2004229214
- 700 1_
- $a Valenta, Zdenek
- 700 1#
- $a Chleborád, Karel, $d 1979- $7 _AN037439
- 700 1_
- $a Zvárová, Jana, $d 1943-2017 $7 nlk19990074087
- 700 1#
- $a Feberová, Jitka. $7 nlk20040152207
- 700 1_
- $a Hippmann, Radek $7 xx0136171
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001203 $t Community dentistry and oral epidemiology $x 1600-0528 $g Roč. 40 Suppl 1 (2012), s. 65-70
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221005115228 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956705 $s 792192
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 40 Suppl 1 $d 65-70 $i 1600-0528 $m Community dentistry and oral epidemiology $n Community Dent Oral Epidemiol $x MED00001203
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20121023