Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?

P. Klimes, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai, TM. Fayle, M. Janda, GD. Weiblen, V. Novotny,

. 2012 ; 81 (5) : 1103-12.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000773

1. Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. 2. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. 3. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. 4. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. 5. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000773
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130111101804.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22642689
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Klimes, Petr $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, CZ-370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. peta.klimes@gmail.com
245    10
$a Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? / $c P. Klimes, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai, TM. Fayle, M. Janda, GD. Weiblen, V. Novotny,
520    9_
$a 1. Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. 2. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. 3. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. 4. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. 5. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Formicidae $x fyziologie $7 D001000
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D001522
650    _2
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a stromy $x klasifikace $x fyziologie $7 D014197
650    _2
$a tropické klima $7 D014329
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Idigel, Cliffson
700    1_
$a Rimandai, Maling
700    1_
$a Fayle, Tom M
700    1_
$a Janda, Milan
700    1_
$a Weiblen, George D
700    1_
$a Novotny, Vojtech
773    0_
$w MED00007675 $t The Journal of animal ecology $x 1365-2656 $g Roč. 81, č. 5 (2012), s. 1103-12
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22642689 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130111101911 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963555 $s 798937
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 81 $c 5 $d 1103-12 $i 1365-2656 $m Journal of animal ecology $n J Anim Ecol $x MED00007675
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...