-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?
P. Klimes, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai, TM. Fayle, M. Janda, GD. Weiblen, V. Novotny,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1998 do Před 2 roky
Wiley Online Library (archiv)
od 1998-01-01 do 2012-12-31
Wiley Free Content
od 1998 do Před 2 roky
- MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- chování zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- Formicidae fyziologie MeSH
- stromy klasifikace fyziologie MeSH
- tropické klima MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
1. Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. 2. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. 3. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. 4. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. 5. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000773
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130111101804.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22642689
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Klimes, Petr $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovska 31, CZ-370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. peta.klimes@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests? / $c P. Klimes, C. Idigel, M. Rimandai, TM. Fayle, M. Janda, GD. Weiblen, V. Novotny,
- 520 9_
- $a 1. Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. 2. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. 3. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. 4. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. 5. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Formicidae $x fyziologie $7 D001000
- 650 _2
- $a chování zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D001522
- 650 _2
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
- 650 _2
- $a stromy $x klasifikace $x fyziologie $7 D014197
- 650 _2
- $a tropické klima $7 D014329
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Idigel, Cliffson
- 700 1_
- $a Rimandai, Maling
- 700 1_
- $a Fayle, Tom M
- 700 1_
- $a Janda, Milan
- 700 1_
- $a Weiblen, George D
- 700 1_
- $a Novotny, Vojtech
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007675 $t The Journal of animal ecology $x 1365-2656 $g Roč. 81, č. 5 (2012), s. 1103-12
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22642689 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130111101911 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963555 $s 798937
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 81 $c 5 $d 1103-12 $i 1365-2656 $m Journal of animal ecology $n J Anim Ecol $x MED00007675
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108