-
Something wrong with this record ?
Elastic three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells
M. Rampichová, J. Chvojka, M. Buzgo, E. Prosecká, P. Mikeš, L. Vysloužilová, D. Tvrdík, P. Kochová, T. Gregor, D. Lukáš, E. Amler,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NT12156
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Source
NLK
PubMed Central
from 1997
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1998-02-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1991
PubMed
23216517
DOI
10.1111/cpr.12001
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cell Differentiation * MeSH
- Cell Culture Techniques instrumentation methods MeSH
- Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells cytology metabolism MeSH
- Nanofibers chemistry ultrastructure MeSH
- Osteogenesis MeSH
- Osteocalcin metabolism MeSH
- Cell Movement MeSH
- Polyesters chemistry MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Cell Proliferation MeSH
- Elasticity MeSH
- Regenerative Medicine MeSH
- Integrin-Binding Sialoprotein metabolism MeSH
- Tissue Engineering MeSH
- Tissue Scaffolds * MeSH
- Cell Survival MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We prepared 3D poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibre scaffolds and tested their use for seeding, proliferation, differentiation and migration of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D nanofibres were prepared using a special collector for common electrospinning; simultaneously, a 2D PCL nanofibre layer was prepared using a classic plain collector. Both scaffolds were seeded with MSCs and biologically tested. MSC adhesion, migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation were investigated. RESULTS: The 3D PCL scaffold was characterized by having better biomechanical properties, namely greater elasticity and resistance against stress and strain, thus this scaffold will be able to find broad applications in tissue engineering. Clearly, while nanofibre layers of the 2D scaffold prevented MSCs from migrating through the conformation, cells infiltrated freely through the 3D scaffold. MSC adhesion to the 3D nanofibre PCL layer was also statistically more common than to the 2D scaffold (P < 0.05), and proliferation and viability of MSCs 2 or 3 weeks post-seeding, were also greater on the 3D scaffold. In addition, the 3D PCL scaffold was also characterized by displaying enhanced MSC osteogenic differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: We draw the conclusion that all positive effects observed using the 3D PCL nanofibre scaffold are related to the larger fibre surface area available to the cells. Thus, the proposed 3D structure of the nanofibre layer will find a wide array of applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13012347
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191021094201.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130404s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/cpr.12001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23216517
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rampichová, Michala $u Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 142 40, Prague, Czech Republic. m.rampichova@biomed.cas.cz $7 xx0171325
- 245 10
- $a Elastic three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells / $c M. Rampichová, J. Chvojka, M. Buzgo, E. Prosecká, P. Mikeš, L. Vysloužilová, D. Tvrdík, P. Kochová, T. Gregor, D. Lukáš, E. Amler,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: We prepared 3D poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibre scaffolds and tested their use for seeding, proliferation, differentiation and migration of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D nanofibres were prepared using a special collector for common electrospinning; simultaneously, a 2D PCL nanofibre layer was prepared using a classic plain collector. Both scaffolds were seeded with MSCs and biologically tested. MSC adhesion, migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation were investigated. RESULTS: The 3D PCL scaffold was characterized by having better biomechanical properties, namely greater elasticity and resistance against stress and strain, thus this scaffold will be able to find broad applications in tissue engineering. Clearly, while nanofibre layers of the 2D scaffold prevented MSCs from migrating through the conformation, cells infiltrated freely through the 3D scaffold. MSC adhesion to the 3D nanofibre PCL layer was also statistically more common than to the 2D scaffold (P < 0.05), and proliferation and viability of MSCs 2 or 3 weeks post-seeding, were also greater on the 3D scaffold. In addition, the 3D PCL scaffold was also characterized by displaying enhanced MSC osteogenic differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: We draw the conclusion that all positive effects observed using the 3D PCL nanofibre scaffold are related to the larger fibre surface area available to the cells. Thus, the proposed 3D structure of the nanofibre layer will find a wide array of applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné kultury $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D018929
- 650 12
- $a buněčná diferenciace $7 D002454
- 650 _2
- $a pohyb buněk $7 D002465
- 650 _2
- $a proliferace buněk $7 D049109
- 650 _2
- $a viabilita buněk $7 D002470
- 650 _2
- $a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
- 650 _2
- $a pružnost $7 D004548
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a sialoprotein vázající integrin $x metabolismus $7 D058574
- 650 _2
- $a mezenchymální kmenové buňky $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D059630
- 650 _2
- $a nanovlákna $x chemie $x ultrastruktura $7 D057139
- 650 _2
- $a osteokalcin $x metabolismus $7 D015675
- 650 _2
- $a osteogeneze $7 D010012
- 650 _2
- $a polyestery $x chemie $7 D011091
- 650 _2
- $a regenerativní lékařství $7 D044968
- 650 _2
- $a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
- 650 _2
- $a tkáňové inženýrství $7 D023822
- 650 12
- $a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $7 D054457
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Chvojka, Jiří $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Buzgo, Matej $u - $7 xx0255533
- 700 1_
- $a Prosecká, Eva $u - $7 xx0171465
- 700 1_
- $a Mikeš, Petr $u - $7 _AN080739
- 700 1_
- $a Vysloužilová, Lucie $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Tvrdík, D $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kochová, Petra $u - $7 _AN047718
- 700 1_
- $a Gregor, T $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Lukáš, David, $u - $d 1958- $7 xx0000188
- 700 1_
- $a Amler, Evžen, $u - $d 1958- $7 xx0014074
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001074 $t Cell proliferation $x 1365-2184 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2013), s. 23-37
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23216517 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191021094634 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 975545 $s 810628
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 46 $c 1 $d 23-37 $i 1365-2184 $m Cell proliferation $n Cell Prolif $x MED00001074
- GRA __
- $a NT12156 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130404