Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Arrangement of nuclear structures is not transmitted through mitosis but is identical in sister cells

DY. Orlova, L. Stixová, S. Kozubek, HJ. Gierman, G. Šustáčková, AV. Chernyshev, RN. Medvedev, S. Legartová, R. Versteeg, P. Matula, R. Stoklasa, E. Bártová,

. 2012 ; 113 (11) : 3313-29.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Although it is well known that chromosomes are non-randomly organized during interphase, it is not completely clear whether higher-order chromatin structure is transmitted from mother to daughter cells. Therefore, we addressed the question of how chromatin is rearranged during interphase and whether heterochromatin pattern is transmitted after mitosis. We additionally tested the similarity of chromatin arrangement in sister interphase nuclei. We noticed a very active cell rotation during interphase, especially when histone hyperacetylation was induced or transcription was inhibited. This natural phenomenon can influence the analysis of nuclear arrangement. Using photoconversion of Dendra2-tagged core histone H4 we showed that the distribution of chromatin in daughter interphase nuclei differed from that in mother cells. Similarly, the nuclear distribution of heterochromatin protein 1β (HP1β) was not completely identical in mother and daughter cells. However, identity between mother and daughter cells was in many cases evidenced by nucleolar composition. Moreover, morphology of nucleoli, HP1β protein, Cajal bodies, chromosome territories, and gene transcripts were identical in sister cell nuclei. We conclude that the arrangement of interphase chromatin is not transmitted through mitosis, but the nuclear pattern is identical in naturally synchronized sister cells. It is also necessary to take into account the possibility that cell rotation and the degree of chromatin condensation during functionally specific cell cycle phases might influence our view of nuclear architecture.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13012663
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130411110518.0
007      
ta
008      
130404s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jcb.24208 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22644811
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Orlova, Darya Yu $u Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, CZ-612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Arrangement of nuclear structures is not transmitted through mitosis but is identical in sister cells / $c DY. Orlova, L. Stixová, S. Kozubek, HJ. Gierman, G. Šustáčková, AV. Chernyshev, RN. Medvedev, S. Legartová, R. Versteeg, P. Matula, R. Stoklasa, E. Bártová,
520    9_
$a Although it is well known that chromosomes are non-randomly organized during interphase, it is not completely clear whether higher-order chromatin structure is transmitted from mother to daughter cells. Therefore, we addressed the question of how chromatin is rearranged during interphase and whether heterochromatin pattern is transmitted after mitosis. We additionally tested the similarity of chromatin arrangement in sister interphase nuclei. We noticed a very active cell rotation during interphase, especially when histone hyperacetylation was induced or transcription was inhibited. This natural phenomenon can influence the analysis of nuclear arrangement. Using photoconversion of Dendra2-tagged core histone H4 we showed that the distribution of chromatin in daughter interphase nuclei differed from that in mother cells. Similarly, the nuclear distribution of heterochromatin protein 1β (HP1β) was not completely identical in mother and daughter cells. However, identity between mother and daughter cells was in many cases evidenced by nucleolar composition. Moreover, morphology of nucleoli, HP1β protein, Cajal bodies, chromosome territories, and gene transcripts were identical in sister cell nuclei. We conclude that the arrangement of interphase chromatin is not transmitted through mitosis, but the nuclear pattern is identical in naturally synchronized sister cells. It is also necessary to take into account the possibility that cell rotation and the degree of chromatin condensation during functionally specific cell cycle phases might influence our view of nuclear architecture.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a buněčné linie $7 D002460
650    _2
$a buněčné jadérko $x účinky léků $x genetika $x ultrastruktura $7 D002466
650    _2
$a chromozomální proteiny, nehistonové $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D002868
650    _2
$a Cajalova tělíska $x účinky léků $x genetika $x ultrastruktura $7 D020541
650    _2
$a daktinomycin $x farmakologie $7 D003609
650    _2
$a fluorescenční barviva $7 D005456
650    _2
$a heterochromatin $x účinky léků $x genetika $x ultrastruktura $7 D006570
650    _2
$a inhibitory histondeacetylas $x farmakologie $7 D056572
650    _2
$a histony $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D006657
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kyseliny hydroxamové $x farmakologie $7 D006877
650    _2
$a interfáze $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D007399
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a fluorescenční mikroskopie $7 D008856
650    _2
$a mitóza $x účinky léků $x genetika $7 D008938
650    _2
$a fotochemické procesy $7 D055668
650    _2
$a inhibitory syntézy proteinů $x farmakologie $7 D011500
650    _2
$a messenger RNA $x biosyntéza $7 D012333
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Stixová, Lenka $u -
700    1_
$a Kozubek, Stanislav $u -
700    1_
$a Gierman, Hinco J $u -
700    1_
$a Šustáčková, Gabriela $u -
700    1_
$a Chernyshev, Andrei V $u -
700    1_
$a Medvedev, Ruslan N $u -
700    1_
$a Legartová, Soňa $u -
700    1_
$a Versteeg, Rogier $u -
700    1_
$a Matula, Pavel $u -
700    1_
$a Stoklasa, Roman $u -
700    1_
$a Bártová, Eva $u -
773    0_
$w MED00002577 $t Journal of cellular biochemistry $x 1097-4644 $g Roč. 113, č. 11 (2012), s. 3313-29
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22644811 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130411110748 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 975861 $s 810944
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 113 $c 11 $d 3313-29 $i 1097-4644 $m Journal of cellular biochemistry $n J Cell Biochem $x MED00002577
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...