-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Detection of pinworm eggs in the dust of laboratory animals breeding facility, in the cages and on the hands of the technicians
A. Lytvynets, I. Langrova, J. Lachout, J. Vadlejch,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1967 do Před 4 lety
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01 do 2015-04-30
PubMed
23230226
DOI
10.1258/la.2012.012060
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bydlení zvířat * MeSH
- chov * MeSH
- enterobióza prevence a kontrola přenos veterinární MeSH
- kontaminace zdravotnického vybavení * MeSH
- krysa rodu rattus parazitologie MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí MeSH
- nemoci hlodavců parazitologie prevence a kontrola přenos MeSH
- ovum MeSH
- Oxyuroidea izolace a purifikace MeSH
- prach MeSH
- pracovníci laboratoře * MeSH
- větrání MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- krysa rodu rattus parazitologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Pinworms (Nematoda: Oxyurida) are common contaminants in most laboratory rodent colonies. The aim of the study was to monitor the transmission of Syphacia muris eggs in laboratory rat breeding facilities. Dust in a breeding room was investigated using special grids (free fallout, or through the help suction chamber). Furthermore, the ventilation system, breeding cages and the hands of the laboratory technical staff were examined. In the case of free fallout, the percentage of positive grids increased slightly over time: from 5.5% (after 24 h) to 8.2% (72 h). Similar values were also found when using the suction chamber (7.6%). Many more pinworm eggs were found in samples collected every second month from suction holes of the ventilation system (28.7%). One-half of the samples taken from the breeding cages (before washing) exhibited pinworm eggs (50.8%). Examination of the hands of technical staff showed positive detection in 37.9% of cases. In this study, certain transmission factors (dust, unclean cages and technicians) were proved to be significant in the distribution of pinworm infection in laboratory rodent facilities.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13031780
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20131008094608.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 131002s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1258/la.2012.012060 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23230226
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Lytvynets, A $u Department of Laboratory Animal Breeding and Hygiene, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague 4-Krc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Detection of pinworm eggs in the dust of laboratory animals breeding facility, in the cages and on the hands of the technicians / $c A. Lytvynets, I. Langrova, J. Lachout, J. Vadlejch,
- 520 9_
- $a Pinworms (Nematoda: Oxyurida) are common contaminants in most laboratory rodent colonies. The aim of the study was to monitor the transmission of Syphacia muris eggs in laboratory rat breeding facilities. Dust in a breeding room was investigated using special grids (free fallout, or through the help suction chamber). Furthermore, the ventilation system, breeding cages and the hands of the laboratory technical staff were examined. In the case of free fallout, the percentage of positive grids increased slightly over time: from 5.5% (after 24 h) to 8.2% (72 h). Similar values were also found when using the suction chamber (7.6%). Many more pinworm eggs were found in samples collected every second month from suction holes of the ventilation system (28.7%). One-half of the samples taken from the breeding cages (before washing) exhibited pinworm eggs (50.8%). Examination of the hands of technical staff showed positive detection in 37.9% of cases. In this study, certain transmission factors (dust, unclean cages and technicians) were proved to be significant in the distribution of pinworm infection in laboratory rodent facilities.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a chov $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a prach $7 D004391
- 650 _2
- $a enterobióza $x prevence a kontrola $x přenos $x veterinární $7 D017229
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
- 650 12
- $a kontaminace zdravotnického vybavení $7 D004866
- 650 12
- $a bydlení zvířat $7 D006799
- 650 12
- $a pracovníci laboratoře $7 D059232
- 650 _2
- $a ovum $7 D010063
- 650 _2
- $a Oxyuroidea $x izolace a purifikace $7 D010124
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $x parazitologie $7 D051381
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci hlodavců $x parazitologie $x prevence a kontrola $x přenos $7 D012376
- 650 _2
- $a větrání $7 D014691
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Langrova, I $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Lachout, J $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Vadlejch, J $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003110 $t Laboratory animals $x 1758-1117 $g Roč. 47, č. 1 (2013), s. 71-3
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23230226 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20131002 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20131008095130 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 995867 $s 830225
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 47 $c 1 $d 71-3 $i 1758-1117 $m Laboratory animals $n Lab Anim $x MED00003110
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20131002