BACKGROUND: The benefit of biventricular pacing (BiV) may be substantially affected by optimal lead placement. AIM: To evaluate the importance of right ventricular (RV) lead positioning on clinical outcome of BiV. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 99 patients with symptomatic heart failure and implantation of BiV system were included. Position of the left-ventricular (LV) lead was selected based on timing of local endocardial signal within the terminal portion of the QRS complex. RV lead was preferably positioned at the midseptum (n=74, RVS group) where the earliest RV endocardial signal was recorded. A subgroup of patients had RV lead placed in the apex (n=25, RVA group). NYHA class, maximum oxygen-uptake (VO(2)max), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, mm) and ejection fraction were assessed every third month. A trend towards greater improvement in NYHA class and significant increase in VO(2)max was present in the RVS group. Moreover, a significant decrease in LVEDD (DeltaLVEDD) was observed in the RVS group only (-3.4+/-6.5 mm versus +1.7+/-6.4 mm in RVA group at 12 months, p=0.004). No significant correlation between the degree of DeltaLVEDD and QRS narrowing induced by BiV was found. LVEDD reduction was predominantly present in dilated cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Midseptal positioning of the RV lead appears to promote reverse LV remodelling during cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org

Literatura