-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of microplate and macrodilution methods in time-kill study of new antimicrobial drugs
Y. Zhou, Z. Hou, C. Fang, X. Xue, F. Da, Y. Wang, H. Bai, X. Luo
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Anti-Infective Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Escherichia coli drug effects MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods MeSH
- Staphylococcus aureus drug effects MeSH
- Staphylococcus epidermidis drug effects MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
In consideration of high production costs of new antimicrobial drugs, a more convenient and economical method for time-kill study is urgently required. In the present experiment, we attempted to demonstrate the feasibility of microplate method as an alternative measure of macrodilution method for time-kill study. Three conventional antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and levofloxacin) and two antimicrobial peptides [A-thanatin and K(4)-S4(1-16)a] were used to determine time-kill curves against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990. Meanwhile, both methods were also performed with three antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNA3, PNA4, and PNA5) targeting ropD gene of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and MRSA WHO-2. In order to study the correlation between the two methods, the growth inhibition rate of PNAs, antimicrobial peptides, and antibiotics for the tested strains were evaluated. A strong agreement between the results obtained from the two methods has been demonstrated. Although microplate method required longer incubation time for a significant result than macrodilution method, the former provides a more convenient, economical, and stable way to perform time-kill test for these agents. Thus, we concluded that microplate method was an available measure for time-kill study of new antimicrobial drugs.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13033242
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20131112094404.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 131014s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-012-0168-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22684972
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Zhou, Ying $u Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of microplate and macrodilution methods in time-kill study of new antimicrobial drugs / $c Y. Zhou, Z. Hou, C. Fang, X. Xue, F. Da, Y. Wang, H. Bai, X. Luo
- 520 9_
- $a In consideration of high production costs of new antimicrobial drugs, a more convenient and economical method for time-kill study is urgently required. In the present experiment, we attempted to demonstrate the feasibility of microplate method as an alternative measure of macrodilution method for time-kill study. Three conventional antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and levofloxacin) and two antimicrobial peptides [A-thanatin and K(4)-S4(1-16)a] were used to determine time-kill curves against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990. Meanwhile, both methods were also performed with three antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNA3, PNA4, and PNA5) targeting ropD gene of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and MRSA WHO-2. In order to study the correlation between the two methods, the growth inhibition rate of PNAs, antimicrobial peptides, and antibiotics for the tested strains were evaluated. A strong agreement between the results obtained from the two methods has been demonstrated. Although microplate method required longer incubation time for a significant result than macrodilution method, the former provides a more convenient, economical, and stable way to perform time-kill test for these agents. Thus, we concluded that microplate method was an available measure for time-kill study of new antimicrobial drugs.
- 650 _2
- $a antiinfekční látky $x farmakologie $7 D000890
- 650 _2
- $a Escherichia coli $x účinky léků $7 D004926
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $x metody $7 D008826
- 650 _2
- $a Staphylococcus aureus $x účinky léků $7 D013211
- 650 _2
- $a Staphylococcus epidermidis $x účinky léků $7 D013212
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hou, Zheng $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Fang, Chao $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Xue, Xiaoyan $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Da, Fei $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Wang, Yukun $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Bai, Hui $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Luo, Xiaoxing $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 58, č. 1 (2013), s. 9-16
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22684972 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20131014 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20131112093955 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1000246 $s 831695
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 58 $c 1 $d 9-16 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $b NLK138 $a Pubmed-20131014