• Something wrong with this record ?

The phylogenetic structure of microbial biofilms and free-living bacteria in a small stream

L. Brablcová, I. Buriánková, P. Badurová, M. Rulík

. 2013 ; 58 (3) : 235-243.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

The phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume of both planktonic and biofilm communities were studied in a low-order Bystřice stream near Olomouc City, in the Czech Republic. The aim of the study was to compare the microbial communities colonizing different biofilm substrata (stream aggregates, stream sediment, underwater tree roots, stream stones, and aquatic macrophytes) to those of free-living bacteria. The phylogenetic composition was analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for main phylogenetic groups. All phylogenetic groups studied were detected in all sample types. The stream stone was the substratum where nearly all phylogenetic groups were the most abundant, while the lowest proportion to the DAPI-stained cells was found for free-living bacteria. The probe specific for the domain Bacteria detected 20.6 to 45.8 % of DAPI-stained cells while the probe specific for the domain Archaea detected 4.3 to 17.9 %. The most abundant group of Proteobacteria was Alphaproteobacteria with a mean of 14.2 %, and the least abundant was Betaproteobacteria with a mean of 11.4 %. The average value of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria group was 10.5 %. Total cell numbers and bacterial biomass were highest in sediment and root biofilm. The value of cell biovolume was highest in stone biofilm and lowest in sediment. Overall, this study revealed relevant differences in phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume between different stream biofilms and free-living bacteria.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14046053
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140415095544.0
007      
ta
008      
140212s2013 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-012-0201-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23129136
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Brablcová, Lenka $u Laboratory of Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc $7 ola2015878528
245    14
$a The phylogenetic structure of microbial biofilms and free-living bacteria in a small stream / $c L. Brablcová, I. Buriánková, P. Badurová, M. Rulík
520    9_
$a The phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume of both planktonic and biofilm communities were studied in a low-order Bystřice stream near Olomouc City, in the Czech Republic. The aim of the study was to compare the microbial communities colonizing different biofilm substrata (stream aggregates, stream sediment, underwater tree roots, stream stones, and aquatic macrophytes) to those of free-living bacteria. The phylogenetic composition was analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for main phylogenetic groups. All phylogenetic groups studied were detected in all sample types. The stream stone was the substratum where nearly all phylogenetic groups were the most abundant, while the lowest proportion to the DAPI-stained cells was found for free-living bacteria. The probe specific for the domain Bacteria detected 20.6 to 45.8 % of DAPI-stained cells while the probe specific for the domain Archaea detected 4.3 to 17.9 %. The most abundant group of Proteobacteria was Alphaproteobacteria with a mean of 14.2 %, and the least abundant was Betaproteobacteria with a mean of 11.4 %. The average value of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria group was 10.5 %. Total cell numbers and bacterial biomass were highest in sediment and root biofilm. The value of cell biovolume was highest in stone biofilm and lowest in sediment. Overall, this study revealed relevant differences in phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume between different stream biofilms and free-living bacteria.
650    _2
$a Archaea $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001105
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    12
$a biofilmy $7 D018441
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a geologické sedimenty $x mikrobiologie $7 D019015
650    _2
$a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $7 D017404
650    12
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a chemické jevy $7 D055598
650    _2
$a řeky $x mikrobiologie $7 D045483
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1#
$a Buriánková, Iva $u Laboratory of Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc $7 ola2015878519
700    1#
$a Badurová, Pavlína $u Laboratory of Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc $7 xx0193324
700    1_
$a Rulík, Martin, $u Laboratory of Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Olomouc $d 1968- $7 xx0133875
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 58, č. 3 (2013), s. 235-243
856    41
$u http://link.springer.com/journal/12223/58/3/page/1 $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140212 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140415095641 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1019640 $s 844587
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 58 $c 3 $d 235-243 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20140212

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...