-
Something wrong with this record ?
Reclassification of Bifidobacterium stercoris Kim et al. 2010 as a later heterotypic synonym of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
J. Killer, I. Sedláček, V. Rada, J. Havlík, J. Kopečný,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1951 to 2 years ago
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2000 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Aldehyde-Lyases genetics MeSH
- Bifidobacterium classification genetics MeSH
- DNA, Bacterial genetics MeSH
- DNA Gyrase genetics MeSH
- DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases genetics MeSH
- Peptide Elongation Factor G genetics MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Phylogeny * MeSH
- Nucleic Acid Hybridization MeSH
- Molecular Sequence Data MeSH
- Multilocus Sequence Typing MeSH
- Ribosomal Proteins genetics MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Bacterial Typing Techniques MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The taxonomic position of Bifidobacterium stercoris Eg1(T) ( = JCM 15918(T)) based on comparative 16S rRNA gene and hsp60 sequence analyses was found to be controversial, as the strain showed high similarity to the type strain of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, CCUG 18363(T). Therefore, the relationship between the two species was investigated by a taxonomic study that included, in addition to re-evaluation of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, determination of DNA-DNA binding and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of housekeeping genes encoding the DNA-directed RNA polymerase B subunit (rpoC), putative xylulose-5-phosphate/fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase (xfp), elongation factor EF-G (fusA), 50S ribosomal protein L2 (rplB) and DNA gyrase B subunit (gyrB). Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed relatively high similarity (98.9 %) between B. stercoris KCTC 5756(T) and B. adolescentis ATCC 15703(T). MLSA revealed close relatedness between B. stercoris KCTC 5756(T) and B. adolescentis CCUG 18363(T), with 99.3-100 % similarity between the rpoC, xfp, fusA, rplB and gyrB gene sequences. In addition, relatively high dnaJ1 gene sequence similarity of 97.7 % was found between the strains. Similar phenotypes and a high DNA-DNA binding value (78.9 %) confirmed that B. stercoris and B. adolescentis are synonymous. Based on these results, it is proposed that the species Bifidobacterium stercoris Kim et al. 2010 should be reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of Bifidobacterium adolescentis Reuter 1963 (Approved Lists 1980).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14050760
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140410102455.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140401s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1099/ijs.0.054957-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24187022
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Killer, J
- 245 10
- $a Reclassification of Bifidobacterium stercoris Kim et al. 2010 as a later heterotypic synonym of Bifidobacterium adolescentis / $c J. Killer, I. Sedláček, V. Rada, J. Havlík, J. Kopečný,
- 520 9_
- $a The taxonomic position of Bifidobacterium stercoris Eg1(T) ( = JCM 15918(T)) based on comparative 16S rRNA gene and hsp60 sequence analyses was found to be controversial, as the strain showed high similarity to the type strain of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, CCUG 18363(T). Therefore, the relationship between the two species was investigated by a taxonomic study that included, in addition to re-evaluation of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, determination of DNA-DNA binding and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of housekeeping genes encoding the DNA-directed RNA polymerase B subunit (rpoC), putative xylulose-5-phosphate/fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase (xfp), elongation factor EF-G (fusA), 50S ribosomal protein L2 (rplB) and DNA gyrase B subunit (gyrB). Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed relatively high similarity (98.9 %) between B. stercoris KCTC 5756(T) and B. adolescentis ATCC 15703(T). MLSA revealed close relatedness between B. stercoris KCTC 5756(T) and B. adolescentis CCUG 18363(T), with 99.3-100 % similarity between the rpoC, xfp, fusA, rplB and gyrB gene sequences. In addition, relatively high dnaJ1 gene sequence similarity of 97.7 % was found between the strains. Similar phenotypes and a high DNA-DNA binding value (78.9 %) confirmed that B. stercoris and B. adolescentis are synonymous. Based on these results, it is proposed that the species Bifidobacterium stercoris Kim et al. 2010 should be reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of Bifidobacterium adolescentis Reuter 1963 (Approved Lists 1980).
- 650 _2
- $a aldehydlyasy $x genetika $7 D000446
- 650 _2
- $a techniky typizace bakterií $7 D015373
- 650 _2
- $a Bifidobacterium $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D001644
- 650 _2
- $a DNA gyráza $x genetika $7 D027081
- 650 _2
- $a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
- 650 _2
- $a DNA řízené RNA-polymerasy $x genetika $7 D012321
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární sekvence - údaje $7 D008969
- 650 _2
- $a multilokusová sekvenční typizace $7 D058885
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace nukleových kyselin $7 D009693
- 650 _2
- $a elongační faktor G $x genetika $7 D020653
- 650 _2
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 12
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a ribozomální proteiny $x genetika $7 D012269
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sedláček, I $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Rada, V $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Havlík, J $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kopečný, J $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006002 $t International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology $x 1466-5034 $g Roč. 63, č. Pt 11 (2013), s. 4350-3
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24187022 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140401 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140410102544 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1017896 $s 849340
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 63 $c Pt 11 $d 4350-3 $i 1466-5034 $m International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology $n Int. j. syst. evol. microbiol. (Print) $x MED00006002
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140401