-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles
J. Fulneček, A. Kovařík,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2000
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2000
Free Medical Journals
od 2000
PubMed Central
od 2000 do 2020
Europe PubMed Central
od 2000
Open Access Digital Library
od 2000-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2000-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2000-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2000-01-01 do 2020-12-07
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2000 do 2020
PubMed
24393618
DOI
10.1186/1471-2156-15-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- 5-methylcytosin chemie MeSH
- DNA rostlinná genetika MeSH
- epigeneze genetická MeSH
- metylace DNA * MeSH
- obratlovci genetika MeSH
- polymorfismus genetický * MeSH
- restrikční mapování MeSH
- tabák genetika MeSH
- techniky amplifikace nukleových kyselin metody MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation plays a key role in development, contributes to genome stability, and may also respond to external factors supporting adaptation and evolution. To connect different types of stimuli with particular biological processes, identifying genome regions with altered 5-methylcytosine distribution at a genome-wide scale is important. Many researchers are using the simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) method that is particularly useful in studies of epigenetic variation. However, electrophoretic patterns produced by the method are rather difficult to interpret, particularly when MspI and HpaII isoschizomers are used because these enzymes are methylation-sensitive, and any C within the CCGG recognition motif can be methylated in plant DNA. RESULTS: Here, we evaluate MSAP patterns with respect to current knowledge of the enzyme activities and the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in plant and vertebrate genomes. We discuss potential caveats related to complex MSAP patterns and provide clues regarding how to interpret them. We further show that addition of combined HpaII + MspI digestion would assist in the interpretation of the most controversial MSAP pattern represented by the signal in the HpaII but not in the MspI profile. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modification of the MSAP protocol that definitely discerns between putative hemimethylated mCCGG and internal CmCGG sites. We believe that our view and the simple improvement will assist in correct MSAP data interpretation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14063773
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140707130440.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/1471-2156-15-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24393618
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fulneček, Jaroslav $u Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v,v,i,, Královopolská 135, Brno CZ-612 65, Czech Republic. fulnecek@ibp.cz.
- 245 10
- $a How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles / $c J. Fulneček, A. Kovařík,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: DNA methylation plays a key role in development, contributes to genome stability, and may also respond to external factors supporting adaptation and evolution. To connect different types of stimuli with particular biological processes, identifying genome regions with altered 5-methylcytosine distribution at a genome-wide scale is important. Many researchers are using the simple, reliable, and relatively inexpensive Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) method that is particularly useful in studies of epigenetic variation. However, electrophoretic patterns produced by the method are rather difficult to interpret, particularly when MspI and HpaII isoschizomers are used because these enzymes are methylation-sensitive, and any C within the CCGG recognition motif can be methylated in plant DNA. RESULTS: Here, we evaluate MSAP patterns with respect to current knowledge of the enzyme activities and the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in plant and vertebrate genomes. We discuss potential caveats related to complex MSAP patterns and provide clues regarding how to interpret them. We further show that addition of combined HpaII + MspI digestion would assist in the interpretation of the most controversial MSAP pattern represented by the signal in the HpaII but not in the MspI profile. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend modification of the MSAP protocol that definitely discerns between putative hemimethylated mCCGG and internal CmCGG sites. We believe that our view and the simple improvement will assist in correct MSAP data interpretation.
- 650 _2
- $a 5-methylcytosin $x chemie $7 D044503
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a metylace DNA $7 D019175
- 650 _2
- $a DNA rostlinná $x genetika $7 D018744
- 650 _2
- $a epigeneze genetická $7 D044127
- 650 _2
- $a techniky amplifikace nukleových kyselin $x metody $7 D021141
- 650 12
- $a polymorfismus genetický $7 D011110
- 650 _2
- $a restrikční mapování $7 D015183
- 650 _2
- $a tabák $x genetika $7 D014026
- 650 _2
- $a obratlovci $x genetika $7 D014714
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kovařík, Aleš
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008180 $t BMC genetics $x 1471-2156 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2014), s. 2
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24393618 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140707130729 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1031257 $s 862505
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 15 $c - $d 2 $i 1471-2156 $m BMC genetics $n BMC Genet $x MED00008180
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704