Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Assessment of optimal right ventricular pacing site using invasive measurement of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function

V. Vancura, D. Wichterle, V. Melenovsky, J. Kautzner,

. 2013 ; 15 (10) : 1482-90.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

AIMS: Right ventricular apical pacing has a detrimental effect on left ventricular (LV) function. More optimal pacing site may be found by invasive measurement of LV mechanical performance during pacing from different RV pacing sites. We aimed to investigate the effect of RV pacing lead location on invasive indices of LV mechanical performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled. Single-site endocardial pacing from the lateral LV region was periodically switched to pacing from the mapping catheter navigated to different RV sites within the three-dimensional electroanatomical RV map. SystIndex, DiastIndex, and PPIndex were defined as the ratio of LV dP/dtmax, LV dP/dtmin, and arterial pulse pressure during RV pacing to corresponding values from adjacent periods of LV pacing. Haemodynamic data were analysed in 18 RV segments created by dividing RV horizontally (basal, mid, and apical portion), vertically (inferior, mid, and superior portion) and frontally (septum and free wall). Eight patients (58 ± 7 years; 2 females; 26 ± 4 RV pacing sites per patient) were enrolled into the study. Compared with LV pacing, the best RV pacing values of SystIndex and DiastIndex were achieved in basal-mid-septal segment (+6.9%, P = 0.02 and +3.4%, P = 0.36, respectively) while the best PPIndex was obtained in superior-mid-septal segment of RV (+4.5%, P = 0.02). All indices were fairly concordant showing significant improvement of haemodynamics during RV pacing in the direction from free wall to septum, from apex to base, and from inferior to superior segments. CONCLUSION: The best LV mechanical performance was achieved by RV septal pacing in the non-apical mid-to-superior segments.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14064200
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140709115701.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/europace/eut068 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23585254
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Vancura, Vlastimil $u Department of Cardiology, Complex Cardiovascular Centre, University Hospital Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Assessment of optimal right ventricular pacing site using invasive measurement of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function / $c V. Vancura, D. Wichterle, V. Melenovsky, J. Kautzner,
520    9_
$a AIMS: Right ventricular apical pacing has a detrimental effect on left ventricular (LV) function. More optimal pacing site may be found by invasive measurement of LV mechanical performance during pacing from different RV pacing sites. We aimed to investigate the effect of RV pacing lead location on invasive indices of LV mechanical performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled. Single-site endocardial pacing from the lateral LV region was periodically switched to pacing from the mapping catheter navigated to different RV sites within the three-dimensional electroanatomical RV map. SystIndex, DiastIndex, and PPIndex were defined as the ratio of LV dP/dtmax, LV dP/dtmin, and arterial pulse pressure during RV pacing to corresponding values from adjacent periods of LV pacing. Haemodynamic data were analysed in 18 RV segments created by dividing RV horizontally (basal, mid, and apical portion), vertically (inferior, mid, and superior portion) and frontally (septum and free wall). Eight patients (58 ± 7 years; 2 females; 26 ± 4 RV pacing sites per patient) were enrolled into the study. Compared with LV pacing, the best RV pacing values of SystIndex and DiastIndex were achieved in basal-mid-septal segment (+6.9%, P = 0.02 and +3.4%, P = 0.36, respectively) while the best PPIndex was obtained in superior-mid-septal segment of RV (+4.5%, P = 0.02). All indices were fairly concordant showing significant improvement of haemodynamics during RV pacing in the direction from free wall to septum, from apex to base, and from inferior to superior segments. CONCLUSION: The best LV mechanical performance was achieved by RV septal pacing in the non-apical mid-to-superior segments.
650    _2
$a fibrilace síní $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a krevní tlak $7 D001794
650    _2
$a kardiostimulace umělá $x metody $7 D002304
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
650    12
$a diastola $7 D003971
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické $7 D022062
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční komory $x patofyziologie $7 D006352
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    12
$a systola $7 D013599
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    12
$a funkce levé komory srdeční $7 D016277
650    12
$a funkce pravé komory srdeční $7 D016278
650    _2
$a mezikomorová přepážka $x patofyziologie $7 D054088
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan
700    1_
$a Melenovsky, Vojtech
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef
773    0_
$w MED00149837 $t Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 15, č. 10 (2013), s. 1482-90
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23585254 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140709115953 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031684 $s 862932
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 15 $c 10 $d 1482-90 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...