-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization - an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
J. Benes, J. Zatloukal, A. Simanova, I. Chytra, E. Kasal,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
PubMed
24891837
DOI
10.1186/1471-2253-14-40
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the "Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients" trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14064302
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210121102048.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/1471-2253-14-40 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24891837
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Benes, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Alej svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization - an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results / $c J. Benes, J. Zatloukal, A. Simanova, I. Chytra, E. Kasal,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the "Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients" trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zatloukal, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Alej svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Simanova, Alena $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Alej svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Chytra, Ivan $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Alej svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kasal, Eduard $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Alej svobody 80, 304 60 Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006769 $t BMC anesthesiology $x 1471-2253 $g Roč. 14, č. - (2014), s. 40
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24891837 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210121102047 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1031786 $s 863034
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 14 $c - $d 40 $i 1471-2253 $m BMC anesthesiology $n BMC Anesthesiol $x MED00006769
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704