-
Something wrong with this record ?
DNA barcodes reveal female dimorphism in syringophilid mites (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea): Stibarokris phoeniconaias and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias are conspecific
E. Glowska, A. Dragun-Damian, L. Broda, J. Dabert, M. Dabert
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1966
ProQuest Central
from 2004-01-01 to 3 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2004-01-01 to 3 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2004-01-01 to 3 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1982
- MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Mite Infestations parasitology veterinary MeSH
- Bird Diseases parasitology MeSH
- Birds MeSH
- Electron Transport Complex IV genetics metabolism MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 28S genetics MeSH
- Mites classification genetics MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Here we present the first evidence of female dimorphism in ectoparasitic quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea). Stibarokris phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 so far have been treated as two distinct species cohabiting inside the quills of feathers of the lesser flamingo Phoeniconaias minor (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) and the American flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber Linnaeus. Although females of these species differ morphologically by the extent of body sclerotisation, presence/absence of lateral hypostomal teeth, and shape of dorsal setae, their important common features are the lack of leg setae vs II, and both stylophore and peritremes shape. Here, we apply the DNA barcode markers to test whether the differences between S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias have a genetic basis, indicating that they really are distinct taxa, or whether they just represent two morphs of a single species. All analysed sequences (616 bp for COI and 1159 bp for 28S rDNA) obtained for specimens representing females of both studied taxa as well as male, tritonymph, protonymph and larva of S. phoeniconaias were identical, which indicates that S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias are conspecific. The formal taxonomic consequence of our results is denial of the genus status of Ciconichenophilus Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and species status of C. phoeniconaias, and recommendation that they should be treated as junior synonyms of Stibarokris Kethley, 1970 and S. phoeniconaias, respectively.
Department of Animal Morphology Faculty of Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań Poland
Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory Faculty of Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14068978
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140901105614.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140825s2014 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.14411/fp.2014.030 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25065134
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Glowska, Eliza $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
- 245 10
- $a DNA barcodes reveal female dimorphism in syringophilid mites (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea): Stibarokris phoeniconaias and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias are conspecific / $c E. Glowska, A. Dragun-Damian, L. Broda, J. Dabert, M. Dabert
- 520 9_
- $a Here we present the first evidence of female dimorphism in ectoparasitic quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea). Stibarokris phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 so far have been treated as two distinct species cohabiting inside the quills of feathers of the lesser flamingo Phoeniconaias minor (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) and the American flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber Linnaeus. Although females of these species differ morphologically by the extent of body sclerotisation, presence/absence of lateral hypostomal teeth, and shape of dorsal setae, their important common features are the lack of leg setae vs II, and both stylophore and peritremes shape. Here, we apply the DNA barcode markers to test whether the differences between S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias have a genetic basis, indicating that they really are distinct taxa, or whether they just represent two morphs of a single species. All analysed sequences (616 bp for COI and 1159 bp for 28S rDNA) obtained for specimens representing females of both studied taxa as well as male, tritonymph, protonymph and larva of S. phoeniconaias were identical, which indicates that S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias are conspecific. The formal taxonomic consequence of our results is denial of the genus status of Ciconichenophilus Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and species status of C. phoeniconaias, and recommendation that they should be treated as junior synonyms of Stibarokris Kethley, 1970 and S. phoeniconaias, respectively.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci ptáků $x parazitologie $7 D001715
- 650 _2
- $a ptáci $7 D001717
- 650 12
- $a taxonomické DNA čárové kódování $7 D058893
- 650 _2
- $a respirační komplex IV $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D003576
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a infestace roztoči $x parazitologie $x veterinární $7 D008924
- 650 _2
- $a roztoči $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D008925
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 28S $x genetika $7 D012339
- 650 _2
- $a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Dragun-Damian, Anna $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Broda, Lukasz $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Dabert, Jacek $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Dabert, Miroslawa $u Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011006 $t Folia parasitologica $x 0015-5683 $g Roč. 61, č. 3 (2014), s. 272-276
- 856 41
- $u https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/2014/03/12.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 2854 $c 558 a $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140825 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140826123017 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1037316 $s 867821
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 61 $c 3 $d 272-276 $i 0015-5683 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20140825