Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

DNA barcodes reveal female dimorphism in syringophilid mites (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea): Stibarokris phoeniconaias and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias are conspecific

E. Glowska, A. Dragun-Damian, L. Broda, J. Dabert, M. Dabert

. 2014 ; 61 (3) : 272-276.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Here we present the first evidence of female dimorphism in ectoparasitic quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea). Stibarokris phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 so far have been treated as two distinct species cohabiting inside the quills of feathers of the lesser flamingo Phoeniconaias minor (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) and the American flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber Linnaeus. Although females of these species differ morphologically by the extent of body sclerotisation, presence/absence of lateral hypostomal teeth, and shape of dorsal setae, their important common features are the lack of leg setae vs II, and both stylophore and peritremes shape. Here, we apply the DNA barcode markers to test whether the differences between S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias have a genetic basis, indicating that they really are distinct taxa, or whether they just represent two morphs of a single species. All analysed sequences (616 bp for COI and 1159 bp for 28S rDNA) obtained for specimens representing females of both studied taxa as well as male, tritonymph, protonymph and larva of S. phoeniconaias were identical, which indicates that S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias are conspecific. The formal taxonomic consequence of our results is denial of the genus status of Ciconichenophilus Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and species status of C. phoeniconaias, and recommendation that they should be treated as junior synonyms of Stibarokris Kethley, 1970 and S. phoeniconaias, respectively.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14068978
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140901105614.0
007      
ta
008      
140825s2014 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14411/fp.2014.030 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25065134
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Glowska, Eliza $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
245    10
$a DNA barcodes reveal female dimorphism in syringophilid mites (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea): Stibarokris phoeniconaias and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias are conspecific / $c E. Glowska, A. Dragun-Damian, L. Broda, J. Dabert, M. Dabert
520    9_
$a Here we present the first evidence of female dimorphism in ectoparasitic quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Actinotrichida: Prostigmata: Cheyletoidea). Stibarokris phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and Ciconichenophilus phoeniconaias Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 so far have been treated as two distinct species cohabiting inside the quills of feathers of the lesser flamingo Phoeniconaias minor (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) and the American flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber Linnaeus. Although females of these species differ morphologically by the extent of body sclerotisation, presence/absence of lateral hypostomal teeth, and shape of dorsal setae, their important common features are the lack of leg setae vs II, and both stylophore and peritremes shape. Here, we apply the DNA barcode markers to test whether the differences between S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias have a genetic basis, indicating that they really are distinct taxa, or whether they just represent two morphs of a single species. All analysed sequences (616 bp for COI and 1159 bp for 28S rDNA) obtained for specimens representing females of both studied taxa as well as male, tritonymph, protonymph and larva of S. phoeniconaias were identical, which indicates that S. phoeniconaias and C. phoeniconaias are conspecific. The formal taxonomic consequence of our results is denial of the genus status of Ciconichenophilus Skoracki et OConnor, 2010 and species status of C. phoeniconaias, and recommendation that they should be treated as junior synonyms of Stibarokris Kethley, 1970 and S. phoeniconaias, respectively.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a nemoci ptáků $x parazitologie $7 D001715
650    _2
$a ptáci $7 D001717
650    12
$a taxonomické DNA čárové kódování $7 D058893
650    _2
$a respirační komplex IV $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D003576
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a infestace roztoči $x parazitologie $x veterinární $7 D008924
650    _2
$a roztoči $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D008925
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 28S $x genetika $7 D012339
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dragun-Damian, Anna $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
700    1_
$a Broda, Lukasz $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
700    1_
$a Dabert, Jacek $u Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
700    1_
$a Dabert, Miroslawa $u Molecular Biology Techniques Laboratory, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
773    0_
$w MED00011006 $t Folia parasitologica $x 0015-5683 $g Roč. 61, č. 3 (2014), s. 272-276
856    41
$u https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/2014/03/12.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 2854 $c 558 a $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20140825 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140826123017 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1037316 $s 867821
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 61 $c 3 $d 272-276 $i 0015-5683 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20140825

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...