• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: advantage of a genuine three-dimensional approach

Z. Kubínová, J. Janácek, Z. Lhotáková, L. Kubínová, J. Albrechtová,

. 2014 ; 65 (2) : 609-20.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14074413

Chloroplast number per cell is a frequently examined quantitative anatomical parameter, often estimated by counting chloroplast profiles in two-dimensional (2D) sections of mesophyll cells. However, a mesophyll cell is a three-dimensional (3D) structure and this has to be taken into account when quantifying its internal structure. We compared 2D and 3D approaches to chloroplast counting from different points of view: (i) in practical measurements of mesophyll cells of Norway spruce needles, (ii) in a 3D model of a mesophyll cell with chloroplasts, and (iii) using a theoretical analysis. We applied, for the first time, the stereological method of an optical disector based on counting chloroplasts in stacks of spruce needle optical cross-sections acquired by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. This estimate was compared with counting chloroplast profiles in 2D sections from the same stacks of sections. Comparing practical measurements of mesophyll cells, calculations performed in a 3D model of a cell with chloroplasts as well as a theoretical analysis showed that the 2D approach yielded biased results, while the underestimation could be up to 10-fold. We proved that the frequently used method for counting chloroplasts in a mesophyll cell by counting their profiles in 2D sections did not give correct results. We concluded that the present disector method can be efficiently used for unbiased estimation of chloroplast number per mesophyll cell. This should be the method of choice, especially in coniferous needles and leaves with mesophyll cells with lignified cell walls where maceration methods are difficult or impossible to use.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14074413
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20141008101019.0
007      
ta
008      
141006s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/jxb/ert407 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24336344
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kubínová, Zuzana $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Viničná 5, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: advantage of a genuine three-dimensional approach / $c Z. Kubínová, J. Janácek, Z. Lhotáková, L. Kubínová, J. Albrechtová,
520    9_
$a Chloroplast number per cell is a frequently examined quantitative anatomical parameter, often estimated by counting chloroplast profiles in two-dimensional (2D) sections of mesophyll cells. However, a mesophyll cell is a three-dimensional (3D) structure and this has to be taken into account when quantifying its internal structure. We compared 2D and 3D approaches to chloroplast counting from different points of view: (i) in practical measurements of mesophyll cells of Norway spruce needles, (ii) in a 3D model of a mesophyll cell with chloroplasts, and (iii) using a theoretical analysis. We applied, for the first time, the stereological method of an optical disector based on counting chloroplasts in stacks of spruce needle optical cross-sections acquired by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. This estimate was compared with counting chloroplast profiles in 2D sections from the same stacks of sections. Comparing practical measurements of mesophyll cells, calculations performed in a 3D model of a cell with chloroplasts as well as a theoretical analysis showed that the 2D approach yielded biased results, while the underestimation could be up to 10-fold. We proved that the frequently used method for counting chloroplasts in a mesophyll cell by counting their profiles in 2D sections did not give correct results. We concluded that the present disector method can be efficiently used for unbiased estimation of chloroplast number per mesophyll cell. This should be the method of choice, especially in coniferous needles and leaves with mesophyll cells with lignified cell walls where maceration methods are difficult or impossible to use.
650    _2
$a chloroplasty $x metabolismus $7 D002736
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
650    _2
$a mezofylové buňky $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D058503
650    _2
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    _2
$a smrk $7 D028222
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Janácek, Jirí
700    1_
$a Lhotáková, Zuzana
700    1_
$a Kubínová, Lucie
700    1_
$a Albrechtová, Jana $7 nlk20030142283
773    0_
$w MED00006559 $t Journal of experimental botany $x 1460-2431 $g Roč. 65, č. 2 (2014), s. 609-20
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24336344 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20141006 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20141008101407 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1042296 $s 873325
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 65 $c 2 $d 609-20 $i 1460-2431 $m Journal of Experimental Botany $n J Exp Bot $x MED00006559
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20141006

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...