-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: advantage of a genuine three-dimensional approach
Z. Kubínová, J. Janácek, Z. Lhotáková, L. Kubínová, J. Albrechtová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1996-01-01
PubMed
24336344
DOI
10.1093/jxb/ert407
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- chloroplasty metabolismus MeSH
- mezofylové buňky cytologie metabolismus MeSH
- smrk MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Chloroplast number per cell is a frequently examined quantitative anatomical parameter, often estimated by counting chloroplast profiles in two-dimensional (2D) sections of mesophyll cells. However, a mesophyll cell is a three-dimensional (3D) structure and this has to be taken into account when quantifying its internal structure. We compared 2D and 3D approaches to chloroplast counting from different points of view: (i) in practical measurements of mesophyll cells of Norway spruce needles, (ii) in a 3D model of a mesophyll cell with chloroplasts, and (iii) using a theoretical analysis. We applied, for the first time, the stereological method of an optical disector based on counting chloroplasts in stacks of spruce needle optical cross-sections acquired by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. This estimate was compared with counting chloroplast profiles in 2D sections from the same stacks of sections. Comparing practical measurements of mesophyll cells, calculations performed in a 3D model of a cell with chloroplasts as well as a theoretical analysis showed that the 2D approach yielded biased results, while the underestimation could be up to 10-fold. We proved that the frequently used method for counting chloroplasts in a mesophyll cell by counting their profiles in 2D sections did not give correct results. We concluded that the present disector method can be efficiently used for unbiased estimation of chloroplast number per mesophyll cell. This should be the method of choice, especially in coniferous needles and leaves with mesophyll cells with lignified cell walls where maceration methods are difficult or impossible to use.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074413
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141008101019.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/jxb/ert407 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24336344
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kubínová, Zuzana $u Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Viničná 5, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: advantage of a genuine three-dimensional approach / $c Z. Kubínová, J. Janácek, Z. Lhotáková, L. Kubínová, J. Albrechtová,
- 520 9_
- $a Chloroplast number per cell is a frequently examined quantitative anatomical parameter, often estimated by counting chloroplast profiles in two-dimensional (2D) sections of mesophyll cells. However, a mesophyll cell is a three-dimensional (3D) structure and this has to be taken into account when quantifying its internal structure. We compared 2D and 3D approaches to chloroplast counting from different points of view: (i) in practical measurements of mesophyll cells of Norway spruce needles, (ii) in a 3D model of a mesophyll cell with chloroplasts, and (iii) using a theoretical analysis. We applied, for the first time, the stereological method of an optical disector based on counting chloroplasts in stacks of spruce needle optical cross-sections acquired by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. This estimate was compared with counting chloroplast profiles in 2D sections from the same stacks of sections. Comparing practical measurements of mesophyll cells, calculations performed in a 3D model of a cell with chloroplasts as well as a theoretical analysis showed that the 2D approach yielded biased results, while the underestimation could be up to 10-fold. We proved that the frequently used method for counting chloroplasts in a mesophyll cell by counting their profiles in 2D sections did not give correct results. We concluded that the present disector method can be efficiently used for unbiased estimation of chloroplast number per mesophyll cell. This should be the method of choice, especially in coniferous needles and leaves with mesophyll cells with lignified cell walls where maceration methods are difficult or impossible to use.
- 650 _2
- $a chloroplasty $x metabolismus $7 D002736
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a mezofylové buňky $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D058503
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a smrk $7 D028222
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Janácek, Jirí
- 700 1_
- $a Lhotáková, Zuzana
- 700 1_
- $a Kubínová, Lucie
- 700 1_
- $a Albrechtová, Jana $7 nlk20030142283
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006559 $t Journal of experimental botany $x 1460-2431 $g Roč. 65, č. 2 (2014), s. 609-20
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24336344 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141008101407 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042296 $s 873325
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 65 $c 2 $d 609-20 $i 1460-2431 $m Journal of Experimental Botany $n J Exp Bot $x MED00006559
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006