-
Something wrong with this record ?
Reaction time in the agility test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions
E. Zemková, T. Vilman, Z. Kováčiková, D. Hamar,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Competitive Behavior MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Reaction Time * MeSH
- Athletic Performance physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
The study evaluates a reaction time in the Agility Test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions. A group of 16 fit men performed, in random order, 2 versions of the Agility Test: non-competitive Agility Single and Agility Dual in form of simulated competition. In both cases, subjects had to touch, as fast as possible, with either the left or the right foot 1 of 4 mats located in 4 corners outside of an 80 cm square. Mats had to be touched in accordance with the location of the stimulus in one of the corners of the screen. The test consisted of 20 visual stimuli with random generation of their location on the screen and time generation from 500 to 2,500 milliseconds. The result was total reaction time (RT) for all 20 reactions measured by a PC-based system FiTRO Agility Check. Results showed significantly (p < 0.01) better RT in the Agility Dual than in the Agility Single Test (690.6 ± 83.8 milliseconds and 805.8 ± 101.1 milliseconds, respectively). Further comparisons of RT under noncompetitive and simulated competitive conditions for the best 8 subjects proceeded in the second match showed a decrease from 781.3 ± 111.2 milliseconds to 693.6 ± 97.8 milliseconds in the first match and to 637.0 ± 53.0 milliseconds in the second match. It may be concluded that RT is better when the Agility Test is performed in simulated competitive than noncompetitive conditions. The Agility Test in form of competition may be used for children and young athletes to enhance their attention level and motivation.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074751
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141009094517.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182903222 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23524364
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zemková, Erika $u 1Department of Sports Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia; and 2Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Reaction time in the agility test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions / $c E. Zemková, T. Vilman, Z. Kováčiková, D. Hamar,
- 520 9_
- $a The study evaluates a reaction time in the Agility Test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions. A group of 16 fit men performed, in random order, 2 versions of the Agility Test: non-competitive Agility Single and Agility Dual in form of simulated competition. In both cases, subjects had to touch, as fast as possible, with either the left or the right foot 1 of 4 mats located in 4 corners outside of an 80 cm square. Mats had to be touched in accordance with the location of the stimulus in one of the corners of the screen. The test consisted of 20 visual stimuli with random generation of their location on the screen and time generation from 500 to 2,500 milliseconds. The result was total reaction time (RT) for all 20 reactions measured by a PC-based system FiTRO Agility Check. Results showed significantly (p < 0.01) better RT in the Agility Dual than in the Agility Single Test (690.6 ± 83.8 milliseconds and 805.8 ± 101.1 milliseconds, respectively). Further comparisons of RT under noncompetitive and simulated competitive conditions for the best 8 subjects proceeded in the second match showed a decrease from 781.3 ± 111.2 milliseconds to 693.6 ± 97.8 milliseconds in the first match and to 637.0 ± 53.0 milliseconds in the second match. It may be concluded that RT is better when the Agility Test is performed in simulated competitive than noncompetitive conditions. The Agility Test in form of competition may be used for children and young athletes to enhance their attention level and motivation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a sportovní výkon $x fyziologie $7 D054874
- 650 _2
- $a kompetitivní chování $7 D003163
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a reakční čas $7 D011930
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vilman, Tomáš
- 700 1_
- $a Kováčiková, Zuzana
- 700 1_
- $a Hamar, Dušan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008742 $t Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association $x 1533-4287 $g Roč. 27, č. 12 (2013), s. 3445-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23524364 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141009094906 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042634 $s 873663
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 27 $c 12 $d 3445-9 $i 1533-4287 $m Journal of strength and conditioning research $n J Strength Cond Res $x MED00008742
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006