-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Phototoxicity of essential oils intended for cosmetic use
K. Kejlová, D. Jírová, H. Bendová, P. Gajdoš, H. Kolářová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NS9648
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fototoxická dermatitida etiologie MeSH
- kosmetické přípravky toxicita MeSH
- kožní testy MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Litsea toxicita MeSH
- oleje prchavé toxicita MeSH
- oleje rostlin toxicita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The aim of this study, linked-up with a previous study on bergamot oils, was the evaluation of phototoxic potential of essential oils (orange, lemon and Litsea cubeba), used as cosmetic ingredients. The applied tiered testing strategy included chemical analysis of the substances (by means of capillary gas chromatography/mass spectrometry), in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test and EpiDerm™ skin phototoxicity test. In order to clarify the situation in man, the highest non-phototoxic/non-cytotoxic concentrations and concentrations 10 x lower (safety factor 10) were tested xin vivo by means of human skin photopatch test in a limited group of human volunteers. The study revealed, that phototoxicity of the essential oils was dependent on the content of photoactive components and the solvent used. The highest non-phototoxic concentrations obtained by the skin model assay proved to be a useful starting point for subsequent confirmatory human photopatch test aimed to identify safe concentration for human use. However, the highest non-phototoxic concentration obtained in the skin model assay cannot be applied directly for human practice (3 of 8 tested oils evoked a phototoxic reaction). A safety factor of 10 should be applied for extrapolation of experimental data from the skin model assay to man.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14075550
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141015121411.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141014s2010 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.025 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20688147
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kejlová, Kristina $u National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, 100 42 Prague 10, Czech Republic. kejlova@szu.cz
- 245 10
- $a Phototoxicity of essential oils intended for cosmetic use / $c K. Kejlová, D. Jírová, H. Bendová, P. Gajdoš, H. Kolářová,
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this study, linked-up with a previous study on bergamot oils, was the evaluation of phototoxic potential of essential oils (orange, lemon and Litsea cubeba), used as cosmetic ingredients. The applied tiered testing strategy included chemical analysis of the substances (by means of capillary gas chromatography/mass spectrometry), in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test and EpiDerm™ skin phototoxicity test. In order to clarify the situation in man, the highest non-phototoxic/non-cytotoxic concentrations and concentrations 10 x lower (safety factor 10) were tested xin vivo by means of human skin photopatch test in a limited group of human volunteers. The study revealed, that phototoxicity of the essential oils was dependent on the content of photoactive components and the solvent used. The highest non-phototoxic concentrations obtained by the skin model assay proved to be a useful starting point for subsequent confirmatory human photopatch test aimed to identify safe concentration for human use. However, the highest non-phototoxic concentration obtained in the skin model assay cannot be applied directly for human practice (3 of 8 tested oils evoked a phototoxic reaction). A safety factor of 10 should be applied for extrapolation of experimental data from the skin model assay to man.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a kosmetické přípravky $x toxicita $7 D003358
- 650 _2
- $a fototoxická dermatitida $x etiologie $7 D017484
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Litsea $x toxicita $7 D032862
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a oleje prchavé $x toxicita $7 D009822
- 650 _2
- $a oleje rostlin $x toxicita $7 D010938
- 650 _2
- $a kožní testy $7 D012882
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jírová, Dagmar
- 700 1_
- $a Bendová, Hana
- 700 1_
- $a Gajdoš, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Kolářová, Hana
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004536 $t Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA $x 1879-3177 $g Roč. 24, č. 8 (2010), s. 2084-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20688147 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141014 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141015121804 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1043642 $s 874468
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 24 $c 8 $d 2084-9 $i 1879-3177 $m Toxicology in vitro $n Toxicol In Vitro $x MED00004536
- GRA __
- $a NS9648 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141014