-
Something wrong with this record ?
History of operative treatment of forearm diaphyseal fractures
J. Bartoníček, M. Kozánek, JB. Jupiter,
Language English Country United States
Document type Historical Article, Journal Article
- MeSH
- History, 16th Century MeSH
- History, 17th Century MeSH
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- Fracture Fixation history MeSH
- Ulna Fractures history MeSH
- Radius Fractures history MeSH
- Bone Plates history MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Forearm Injuries history MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 16th Century MeSH
- History, 17th Century MeSH
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- United States MeSH
Diaphyseal fractures of the forearm have accompanied humanity throughout its history. Nonsurgical techniques dominated the treatment for centuries, and complications including nonunion and malunion were common. The 19th century featured the recognition of distinct injury patterns. With the development of anesthesia and antisepsis, the operative treatment became widespread. In 1878, Heine described fixation of the diaphyseal nonunion of the distal ulna using an intramedullary ivory peg. Parkhill reported on the application of external fixation for forearm fractures in 1897-1898. Hansmann published the case of plate osteosynthesis of an acute fracture of the radius in 1886. In 1913, Schöne published the technique of closed intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using a silver wire. During the first 2 decades of the 20th century, plate osteosynthesis quickly spread across Europe and North America owing to the influence of Lambotte and Lane. After the World War II, plate osteosynthesis became the surgical treatment of choice for forearm diaphyseal fractures.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008465
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150401084505.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.020 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24332651
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedic Trauma of the First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA.
- 245 10
- $a History of operative treatment of forearm diaphyseal fractures / $c J. Bartoníček, M. Kozánek, JB. Jupiter,
- 520 9_
- $a Diaphyseal fractures of the forearm have accompanied humanity throughout its history. Nonsurgical techniques dominated the treatment for centuries, and complications including nonunion and malunion were common. The 19th century featured the recognition of distinct injury patterns. With the development of anesthesia and antisepsis, the operative treatment became widespread. In 1878, Heine described fixation of the diaphyseal nonunion of the distal ulna using an intramedullary ivory peg. Parkhill reported on the application of external fixation for forearm fractures in 1897-1898. Hansmann published the case of plate osteosynthesis of an acute fracture of the radius in 1886. In 1913, Schöne published the technique of closed intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using a silver wire. During the first 2 decades of the 20th century, plate osteosynthesis quickly spread across Europe and North America owing to the influence of Lambotte and Lane. After the World War II, plate osteosynthesis became the surgical treatment of choice for forearm diaphyseal fractures.
- 650 _2
- $a kostní destičky $x dějiny $7 D001860
- 650 _2
- $a poranění předloktí $x dějiny $7 D005543
- 650 _2
- $a fixace fraktury $x dějiny $7 D005592
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 16. století $7 D049669
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 17. století $7 D049670
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 18. století $7 D049671
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 20. století $7 D049673
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury vřetenní kosti $x dějiny $7 D011885
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury ulny $x dějiny $7 D014458
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 651 _2
- $a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kozánek, Michal $u Department of Orthopaedic Trauma of the First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA.
- 700 1_
- $a Jupiter, Jesse B $u Department of Orthopaedic Trauma of the First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA. Electronic address: JJUPITER1@PARTNERS.ORG.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002698 $t The Journal of hand surgery $x 1531-6564 $g Roč. 39, č. 2 (2014), s. 335-42
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24332651 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150401084735 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065738 $s 891265
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 39 $c 2 $d 335-42 $i 1531-6564 $m The Journal of hand surgery $n J Hand Surg $x MED00002698
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306