Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

External validation of extended prostate biopsy nomogram

J. Hrbáček, I. Minárik, T. Sieger, M. Babjuk,

. 2015 ; 68 (2) : 148-52. [pub] 20150518

Language English Country Poland

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Historical nomograms for the prediction of cancer on prostate biopsy, developed in the sextant biopsy era are no more accurate today. The aim of this study was an independent external validation of a 10-core biopsy nomogram by Chun et al. (2007). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 322 patients who presented for their initial biopsy in a tertiary care center and had all the necessary data available were included in the retrospective analysis. To validate the nomogram, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were constructed. RESULTS: Area under the ROC curve calculated for our data using the nomogram was 0.773, similar to that reported originally. However, the nomogram systematically overestimated prostate cancer risk, which, for our data, could be resolved by subtracting 24 points from the total number of points of the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram yielded overall good predictive accuracy as measured by the area under the ROC curve, but it systematically overestimated PC probability in individual patients. However, we showed how the nomogram could easily be adapted to our patient sample, resolving the bias issue.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15031253
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151007120520.0
007      
ta
008      
151005s2015 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5173/ceju.2015.610 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26251732
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Hrbáček, Jan $u Department of Urology, 2 Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University Praha, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a External validation of extended prostate biopsy nomogram / $c J. Hrbáček, I. Minárik, T. Sieger, M. Babjuk,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Historical nomograms for the prediction of cancer on prostate biopsy, developed in the sextant biopsy era are no more accurate today. The aim of this study was an independent external validation of a 10-core biopsy nomogram by Chun et al. (2007). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 322 patients who presented for their initial biopsy in a tertiary care center and had all the necessary data available were included in the retrospective analysis. To validate the nomogram, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were constructed. RESULTS: Area under the ROC curve calculated for our data using the nomogram was 0.773, similar to that reported originally. However, the nomogram systematically overestimated prostate cancer risk, which, for our data, could be resolved by subtracting 24 points from the total number of points of the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram yielded overall good predictive accuracy as measured by the area under the ROC curve, but it systematically overestimated PC probability in individual patients. However, we showed how the nomogram could easily be adapted to our patient sample, resolving the bias issue.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Minárik, Ivo $u Department of Urology, 2 Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University Praha, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sieger, Tomáš $u Centre of Bioinformatics, 2 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Czech Republic ; Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Praha, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Babjuk, Marek $u Department of Urology, 2 Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University Praha, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00183832 $t Central European journal of urology $x 2080-4806 $g Roč. 68, č. 2 (2015), s. 148-52
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26251732 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20151005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151007120706 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1092134 $s 914377
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 68 $c 2 $d 148-52 $e 20150518 $i 2080-4806 $m Central European journal of urology $n Cent European J Urol $x MED00183832
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20151005

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...