-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model
J. Jerabek, T. Novotny, K. Vesely, J. Cagas, V. Jedlicka, P. Vlcek, I. Capov,
Language English Country France
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1999-06-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-03-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1999-06-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials MeSH
- Surgical Mesh * adverse effects MeSH
- Granuloma, Foreign-Body etiology pathology MeSH
- Rabbits MeSH
- Disease Models, Animal MeSH
- Herniorrhaphy * MeSH
- Polypropylenes adverse effects MeSH
- Elasticity MeSH
- Materials Testing MeSH
- Inflammation MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rabbits MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the pore size of a polypropylene mesh on the shrinkage and elasticity of the mesh-tissue complex and the inflammatory reaction to the implant in an open onlay hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one 10 × 10 cm samples of polypropylene meshes of a different pore size (3.0 × 2.8 mm-PP3, 1.0 × 0.8 mm-PP1 and 0.6 × 0.5 mm-PP.5) were implanted in an onlay position in 21 New Zealand white rabbits. After 90 days of implantation the shrinkage, elasticity and foreign body reaction (FBR) were assessed. RESULTS: The shrinkage of PP3 was 30.6 ± 4.3 %, PP1 49.3 ± 2.9 % and PP.5 49.5 ± 2.6 %. The shrinkage of PP3 was significantly lower (PP3 × PP1 p = 0.007, PP3 × PP.5 p = 0.005), PP1 and PP.5 were similar. The elasticity was similar. The strength of FBR in mesh pores was similar. The width of foreign body granuloma layers at the mesh-tissue interface was significantly reduced with increasing pore size (inner: PP3 10.1 ± 1.2; PP1 12.5 ± 2.9; PP.5 17.4 ± 5.2 and outer: PP3 21.2 ± 2.5; PP1 30.6 ± 6.3; PP.5 60.4 ± 14.9). All differences between the widths of granuloma layers were statistically significant (p < 0.010). One animal (PP1) was excluded because of a mesh infection. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of polypropylene mesh of a pore size of 3 mm in an onlay position is associated with a significant reduction of shrinkage in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh. A pore size increase to 3 mm is not sufficient for an improvement of mesh-tissue complex elasticity in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm heavyweight mesh. Polypropylene mesh with enlarged pores to 3 mm is associated with a similar strength of FBR in mesh pores and a reduced foreign body granuloma in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031954
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151012110847.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 fr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10029-014-1278-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25033941
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a fr
- 100 1_
- $a Jerabek, J $u 1st Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekarska 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic, jiri.jerabek@fnusa.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model / $c J. Jerabek, T. Novotny, K. Vesely, J. Cagas, V. Jedlicka, P. Vlcek, I. Capov,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the pore size of a polypropylene mesh on the shrinkage and elasticity of the mesh-tissue complex and the inflammatory reaction to the implant in an open onlay hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one 10 × 10 cm samples of polypropylene meshes of a different pore size (3.0 × 2.8 mm-PP3, 1.0 × 0.8 mm-PP1 and 0.6 × 0.5 mm-PP.5) were implanted in an onlay position in 21 New Zealand white rabbits. After 90 days of implantation the shrinkage, elasticity and foreign body reaction (FBR) were assessed. RESULTS: The shrinkage of PP3 was 30.6 ± 4.3 %, PP1 49.3 ± 2.9 % and PP.5 49.5 ± 2.6 %. The shrinkage of PP3 was significantly lower (PP3 × PP1 p = 0.007, PP3 × PP.5 p = 0.005), PP1 and PP.5 were similar. The elasticity was similar. The strength of FBR in mesh pores was similar. The width of foreign body granuloma layers at the mesh-tissue interface was significantly reduced with increasing pore size (inner: PP3 10.1 ± 1.2; PP1 12.5 ± 2.9; PP.5 17.4 ± 5.2 and outer: PP3 21.2 ± 2.5; PP1 30.6 ± 6.3; PP.5 60.4 ± 14.9). All differences between the widths of granuloma layers were statistically significant (p < 0.010). One animal (PP1) was excluded because of a mesh infection. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of polypropylene mesh of a pore size of 3 mm in an onlay position is associated with a significant reduction of shrinkage in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh. A pore size increase to 3 mm is not sufficient for an improvement of mesh-tissue complex elasticity in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm heavyweight mesh. Polypropylene mesh with enlarged pores to 3 mm is associated with a similar strength of FBR in mesh pores and a reduced foreign body granuloma in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biokompatibilní materiály $7 D001672
- 650 _2
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 _2
- $a pružnost $7 D004548
- 650 _2
- $a granulom z cizího tělesa $x etiologie $x patologie $7 D015745
- 650 12
- $a operace kýly $7 D059685
- 650 _2
- $a zánět $7 D007249
- 650 _2
- $a testování materiálů $7 D008422
- 650 _2
- $a polypropyleny $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011126
- 650 _2
- $a králíci $7 D011817
- 650 12
- $a chirurgické síťky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013526
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Novotny, T
- 700 1_
- $a Vesely, K
- 700 1_
- $a Cagas, J
- 700 1_
- $a Jedlicka, V
- 700 1_
- $a Vlcek, P
- 700 1_
- $a Capov, I
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005723 $t Hernia the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery $x 1248-9204 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2014), s. 855-64
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25033941 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151012111036 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092830 $s 915080
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 18 $c 6 $d 855-64 $e 20140718 $i 1248-9204 $m Hernia $n Hernia $x MED00005723
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005