• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model

J. Jerabek, T. Novotny, K. Vesely, J. Cagas, V. Jedlicka, P. Vlcek, I. Capov,

. 2014 ; 18 (6) : 855-64. [pub] 20140718

Jazyk angličtina Země Francie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15031954
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the pore size of a polypropylene mesh on the shrinkage and elasticity of the mesh-tissue complex and the inflammatory reaction to the implant in an open onlay hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one 10 × 10 cm samples of polypropylene meshes of a different pore size (3.0 × 2.8 mm-PP3, 1.0 × 0.8 mm-PP1 and 0.6 × 0.5 mm-PP.5) were implanted in an onlay position in 21 New Zealand white rabbits. After 90 days of implantation the shrinkage, elasticity and foreign body reaction (FBR) were assessed. RESULTS: The shrinkage of PP3 was 30.6 ± 4.3 %, PP1 49.3 ± 2.9 % and PP.5 49.5 ± 2.6 %. The shrinkage of PP3 was significantly lower (PP3 × PP1 p = 0.007, PP3 × PP.5 p = 0.005), PP1 and PP.5 were similar. The elasticity was similar. The strength of FBR in mesh pores was similar. The width of foreign body granuloma layers at the mesh-tissue interface was significantly reduced with increasing pore size (inner: PP3 10.1 ± 1.2; PP1 12.5 ± 2.9; PP.5 17.4 ± 5.2 and outer: PP3 21.2 ± 2.5; PP1 30.6 ± 6.3; PP.5 60.4 ± 14.9). All differences between the widths of granuloma layers were statistically significant (p < 0.010). One animal (PP1) was excluded because of a mesh infection. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of polypropylene mesh of a pore size of 3 mm in an onlay position is associated with a significant reduction of shrinkage in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh. A pore size increase to 3 mm is not sufficient for an improvement of mesh-tissue complex elasticity in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm heavyweight mesh. Polypropylene mesh with enlarged pores to 3 mm is associated with a similar strength of FBR in mesh pores and a reduced foreign body granuloma in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15031954
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151012110847.0
007      
ta
008      
151005s2014 fr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10029-014-1278-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25033941
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a fr
100    1_
$a Jerabek, J $u 1st Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekarska 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic, jiri.jerabek@fnusa.cz.
245    10
$a Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model / $c J. Jerabek, T. Novotny, K. Vesely, J. Cagas, V. Jedlicka, P. Vlcek, I. Capov,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the pore size of a polypropylene mesh on the shrinkage and elasticity of the mesh-tissue complex and the inflammatory reaction to the implant in an open onlay hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one 10 × 10 cm samples of polypropylene meshes of a different pore size (3.0 × 2.8 mm-PP3, 1.0 × 0.8 mm-PP1 and 0.6 × 0.5 mm-PP.5) were implanted in an onlay position in 21 New Zealand white rabbits. After 90 days of implantation the shrinkage, elasticity and foreign body reaction (FBR) were assessed. RESULTS: The shrinkage of PP3 was 30.6 ± 4.3 %, PP1 49.3 ± 2.9 % and PP.5 49.5 ± 2.6 %. The shrinkage of PP3 was significantly lower (PP3 × PP1 p = 0.007, PP3 × PP.5 p = 0.005), PP1 and PP.5 were similar. The elasticity was similar. The strength of FBR in mesh pores was similar. The width of foreign body granuloma layers at the mesh-tissue interface was significantly reduced with increasing pore size (inner: PP3 10.1 ± 1.2; PP1 12.5 ± 2.9; PP.5 17.4 ± 5.2 and outer: PP3 21.2 ± 2.5; PP1 30.6 ± 6.3; PP.5 60.4 ± 14.9). All differences between the widths of granuloma layers were statistically significant (p < 0.010). One animal (PP1) was excluded because of a mesh infection. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of polypropylene mesh of a pore size of 3 mm in an onlay position is associated with a significant reduction of shrinkage in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh. A pore size increase to 3 mm is not sufficient for an improvement of mesh-tissue complex elasticity in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm heavyweight mesh. Polypropylene mesh with enlarged pores to 3 mm is associated with a similar strength of FBR in mesh pores and a reduced foreign body granuloma in comparison to a 1 mm pore lightweight and 0.5 mm pore heavyweight mesh.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biokompatibilní materiály $7 D001672
650    _2
$a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
650    _2
$a pružnost $7 D004548
650    _2
$a granulom z cizího tělesa $x etiologie $x patologie $7 D015745
650    12
$a operace kýly $7 D059685
650    _2
$a zánět $7 D007249
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $7 D008422
650    _2
$a polypropyleny $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011126
650    _2
$a králíci $7 D011817
650    12
$a chirurgické síťky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013526
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Novotny, T
700    1_
$a Vesely, K
700    1_
$a Cagas, J
700    1_
$a Jedlicka, V
700    1_
$a Vlcek, P
700    1_
$a Capov, I
773    0_
$w MED00005723 $t Hernia the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery $x 1248-9204 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2014), s. 855-64
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25033941 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20151005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151012111036 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1092830 $s 915080
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 18 $c 6 $d 855-64 $e 20140718 $i 1248-9204 $m Hernia $n Hernia $x MED00005723
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20151005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace