-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection
M. Jansova, V. Kalis, L. Lobovsky, L. Hyncik, J. Karbanova, Z. Rusavy,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perineum zranění MeSH
- počítačová simulace MeSH
- porod MeSH
- prsty ruky * MeSH
- rány a poranění prevence a kontrola MeSH
- vedení porodu metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15032019
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161109073425.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-014-2425-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24842121
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Jansová, Magdalena $u New Technologies-Research Centre, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic. $7 zcu2015884861
- 245 14
- $a The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection / $c M. Jansova, V. Kalis, L. Lobovsky, L. Hyncik, J. Karbanova, Z. Rusavy,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová simulace $7 D003198
- 650 _2
- $a vedení porodu $x metody $7 D036861
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a prsty ruky $7 D005385
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a porod $7 D036801
- 650 _2
- $a perineum $x zranění $7 D010502
- 650 _2
- $a rány a poranění $x prevence a kontrola $7 D014947
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kalis, Vladimir
- 700 1_
- $a Lobovsky, Libor
- 700 1_
- $a Hyncik, Ludek
- 700 1_
- $a Karbanova, Jaroslava
- 700 1_
- $a Rusavy, Zdenek
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 25, č. 11 (2014), s. 1533-40
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24842121 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161109073401 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092895 $s 915145
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 25 $c 11 $d 1533-40 $e 20140520 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005