• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Are histocompatibility antigens in neonatal skin grafts truly tolerogenic

M. Polácková, M. Svec, V. Viklický,

. 1979 ; 25 (2) : 95-100.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15033149

Neonatal skin grafts across a weak histocompatibility barrier (MSA-incompatible) were used only for sensitization of the recipients whose responsiveness was then tested in two different assays. On the basis of 1. functional inactivation of PEC in a PEC transfer system and 2. inhibition of macrophage migration. The difference between neonatal and adult skin grafts turned out to be quantitative rather than qualitative, i.e., both induced sensitization whose demonstration with the neonatal grafts required more sensitive techniques and/or more favourable timing because it was weaker. The possible nature of the difference, which was occasionally interpreted as being due to a tolerogenic rather than immunogenic activity of neonatal grafts, is discussed.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15033149
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151015143451.0
007      
ta
008      
151015s1979 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)378720
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Poláčková, Marta $7 _AN073708
245    10
$a Are histocompatibility antigens in neonatal skin grafts truly tolerogenic / $c M. Polácková, M. Svec, V. Viklický,
520    9_
$a Neonatal skin grafts across a weak histocompatibility barrier (MSA-incompatible) were used only for sensitization of the recipients whose responsiveness was then tested in two different assays. On the basis of 1. functional inactivation of PEC in a PEC transfer system and 2. inhibition of macrophage migration. The difference between neonatal and adult skin grafts turned out to be quantitative rather than qualitative, i.e., both induced sensitization whose demonstration with the neonatal grafts required more sensitive techniques and/or more favourable timing because it was weaker. The possible nature of the difference, which was occasionally interpreted as being due to a tolerogenic rather than immunogenic activity of neonatal grafts, is discussed.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a novorozená zvířata $x imunologie $7 D000831
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a rejekce štěpu $7 D006084
650    _2
$a histokompatibilní antigeny $x imunologie $7 D006649
650    12
$a imunologická tolerance $7 D007108
650    _2
$a isoantigeny $x imunologie $7 D007519
650    _2
$a lymfocyty $x imunologie $7 D008214
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a myši inbrední C57BL $7 D008810
650    _2
$a kůže $x imunologie $7 D012867
650    12
$a transplantace kůže $7 D016038
650    _2
$a homologní transplantace $7 D014184
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Svec, M
700    1_
$a Viklický, Vladimír, $d 1938- $7 mzk2005269832
773    0_
$w MED00011004 $t Folia biologica $x 0015-5500 $g Roč. 25, č. 2 (1979), s. 95-100
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/378720 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 970 $c sign $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20151015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151015143642 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1094112 $s 916280
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 1979 $b 25 $c 2 $d 95-100 $i 0015-5500 $m Folia biologica (Praha) $n Folia biol. (Praha) $x MED00011004
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20151015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...