Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Antihistamine response: a dynamically refined function at the host-tick interface

JJ. Valdés,

. 2014 ; 7 (-) : 491. [pub] 20141031

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Ticks counteract host inflammatory responses by secreting proteins from their saliva that compete for histamine binding. Among these tick salivary proteins are lipocalins, antiparallel beta-barrel proteins that sequester small molecules. A tick salivary lipocalin has been structurally resolved and experimentally shown to efficiently compete for histamine with its native receptor (e.g., H1 histamine receptor). To date, molecular dynamics simulations focus on protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions, but there are currently no studies for simultaneous ligand exploration between two competing proteins. METHODS: Aided by state-of-the-art, high-throughput computational methods, the current study simulated and analyzed the dynamics of competitive histamine binding at the tick-host interface using the available crystal structures of both the tick salivary lipocalin histamine-binding protein from Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and the human histamine receptor 1. RESULTS: The attraction towards the tick salivary lipocalin seems to depend on the protonated (adding a hydrogen ion) state of histamine since the current study shows that as histamine becomes more protonated it increases its exploration for the tick salivary lipocalin. This implies that during tick feeding, histamine may need to be protonated for the tick salivary lipocalin to efficiently sequester it in order to counteract inflammation. Additionally, the beta-hairpin loops (at both ends of the tick salivary lipocalin barrel) were reported to have a functional role in sequestering histamine and the results in the current study concur and provide evidence for this hypothesis. These beta-hairpin loops of the tick salivary lipocalin possess more acidic residues than a structurally similar but functionally unrelated lipocalin from the butterfly, Pieris brassicae; comparative results indicate these acidic residues may be responsible for the ability of the tick lipocalin to out-compete the native (H1) receptor for histamine. CONCLUSIONS: Three explanatory types of data can be obtained from the current study: (i) the dynamics of multiple binding sites, (ii) competition between two proteins for a ligand, and (iii) the intrinsic molecular components involved in the competition. These data can provide further insight at the atomic level of the host-tick interface that cannot be experimentally determined. Additionally, the methods used in this study can be applied in rationally designing drugs.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000558
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160127094932.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13071-014-0491-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25358914
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Valdés, James J $u Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. valdjj@gmail.com.
245    10
$a Antihistamine response: a dynamically refined function at the host-tick interface / $c JJ. Valdés,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Ticks counteract host inflammatory responses by secreting proteins from their saliva that compete for histamine binding. Among these tick salivary proteins are lipocalins, antiparallel beta-barrel proteins that sequester small molecules. A tick salivary lipocalin has been structurally resolved and experimentally shown to efficiently compete for histamine with its native receptor (e.g., H1 histamine receptor). To date, molecular dynamics simulations focus on protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions, but there are currently no studies for simultaneous ligand exploration between two competing proteins. METHODS: Aided by state-of-the-art, high-throughput computational methods, the current study simulated and analyzed the dynamics of competitive histamine binding at the tick-host interface using the available crystal structures of both the tick salivary lipocalin histamine-binding protein from Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and the human histamine receptor 1. RESULTS: The attraction towards the tick salivary lipocalin seems to depend on the protonated (adding a hydrogen ion) state of histamine since the current study shows that as histamine becomes more protonated it increases its exploration for the tick salivary lipocalin. This implies that during tick feeding, histamine may need to be protonated for the tick salivary lipocalin to efficiently sequester it in order to counteract inflammation. Additionally, the beta-hairpin loops (at both ends of the tick salivary lipocalin barrel) were reported to have a functional role in sequestering histamine and the results in the current study concur and provide evidence for this hypothesis. These beta-hairpin loops of the tick salivary lipocalin possess more acidic residues than a structurally similar but functionally unrelated lipocalin from the butterfly, Pieris brassicae; comparative results indicate these acidic residues may be responsible for the ability of the tick lipocalin to out-compete the native (H1) receptor for histamine. CONCLUSIONS: Three explanatory types of data can be obtained from the current study: (i) the dynamics of multiple binding sites, (ii) competition between two proteins for a ligand, and (iii) the intrinsic molecular components involved in the competition. These data can provide further insight at the atomic level of the host-tick interface that cannot be experimentally determined. Additionally, the methods used in this study can be applied in rationally designing drugs.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a výpočetní biologie $x metody $7 D019295
650    _2
$a histamin $x metabolismus $7 D006632
650    12
$a interakce hostitele a patogenu $7 D054884
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kinetika $7 D007700
650    _2
$a lipokaliny $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D054834
650    _2
$a molekulární modely $7 D008958
650    _2
$a simulace molekulární dynamiky $7 D056004
650    _2
$a vazba proteinů $7 D011485
650    _2
$a receptory histaminu H1 $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D011969
650    _2
$a Rhipicephalus $x fyziologie $7 D048494
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
773    0_
$w MED00165371 $t Parasites & vectors $x 1756-3305 $g Roč. 7, č. - (2014), s. 491
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25358914 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160127095057 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1102839 $s 924764
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 7 $c - $d 491 $e 20141031 $i 1756-3305 $m Parasites & vectors $n Parasit Vectors $x MED00165371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...